了解初级保健提供者对糖尿病自我管理教育和支持的了解和看法。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Christina J. Dietz , Emily Doherty , John Emerson , Karen Kemper , Lior Rennert , Windsor Westbrook Sherrill
{"title":"了解初级保健提供者对糖尿病自我管理教育和支持的了解和看法。","authors":"Christina J. Dietz ,&nbsp;Emily Doherty ,&nbsp;John Emerson ,&nbsp;Karen Kemper ,&nbsp;Lior Rennert ,&nbsp;Windsor Westbrook Sherrill","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The American Diabetes Association Standards of Care recommends that individuals with diabetes receive self-management education, but the utilization of these services remains low. This study explores primary care providers’ knowledge and perceptions of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES).</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A convergent mixed methods study design grounded in the Theoretical Domains Framework was conducted with an initial provider survey, followed by semi-structured interview of a purposeful sub-sample of providers. The survey was distributed via REDCap and interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 140 PCP’s responded to the survey (response rate 37.63 %) and 17 participated in interviews. The average knowledge score of the correct selection of DSMES referral time points was 70.35 %. Five themes emerged in provider interviews: procedural knowledge, ability, beliefs, reinforcement, and cultural norms. Providers wanted bidirectional communication with the DSMES program and were more likely to refer if they had a cultural norm of referring.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Providers have limited knowledge of the appropriate time to refer to DSMES but expressed a willingness to refer. They emphasized the importance of providing their patients with appropriate self-management education and support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48997,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Diabetes","volume":"18 6","pages":"Pages 637-643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding primary care provider’s knowledge and perceptions of diabetes self-management education and support\",\"authors\":\"Christina J. Dietz ,&nbsp;Emily Doherty ,&nbsp;John Emerson ,&nbsp;Karen Kemper ,&nbsp;Lior Rennert ,&nbsp;Windsor Westbrook Sherrill\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pcd.2024.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The American Diabetes Association Standards of Care recommends that individuals with diabetes receive self-management education, but the utilization of these services remains low. This study explores primary care providers’ knowledge and perceptions of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES).</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A convergent mixed methods study design grounded in the Theoretical Domains Framework was conducted with an initial provider survey, followed by semi-structured interview of a purposeful sub-sample of providers. The survey was distributed via REDCap and interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 140 PCP’s responded to the survey (response rate 37.63 %) and 17 participated in interviews. The average knowledge score of the correct selection of DSMES referral time points was 70.35 %. Five themes emerged in provider interviews: procedural knowledge, ability, beliefs, reinforcement, and cultural norms. Providers wanted bidirectional communication with the DSMES program and were more likely to refer if they had a cultural norm of referring.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Providers have limited knowledge of the appropriate time to refer to DSMES but expressed a willingness to refer. They emphasized the importance of providing their patients with appropriate self-management education and support.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary Care Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 637-643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary Care Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751991824002031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751991824002031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:美国糖尿病协会护理标准》建议糖尿病患者接受自我管理教育,但这些服务的利用率仍然很低。本研究探讨了初级保健提供者对糖尿病自我管理教育和支持(DSMES)的认识和看法:研究设计:本研究以理论领域框架为基础,采用聚合混合方法进行研究设计,首先对医疗服务提供者进行调查,然后对特定的医疗服务提供者子样本进行半结构化访谈。调查表通过 REDCap 发布,访谈内容逐字记录和转录:共有 140 名初级保健医生回复了调查(回复率为 37.63%),17 人参加了访谈。正确选择 DSMES 转诊时间点的平均知识得分率为 70.35%。在与医疗服务提供者的访谈中出现了五个主题:程序性知识、能力、信念、强化和文化规范。医疗服务提供者希望与 DSMES 项目进行双向交流,如果他们有转介的文化规范,则更有可能进行转介:医疗服务提供者对转介到 DSMES 的适当时间了解有限,但表示愿意转介。他们强调了为患者提供适当的自我管理教育和支持的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding primary care provider’s knowledge and perceptions of diabetes self-management education and support

Objective

The American Diabetes Association Standards of Care recommends that individuals with diabetes receive self-management education, but the utilization of these services remains low. This study explores primary care providers’ knowledge and perceptions of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES).

Study design

A convergent mixed methods study design grounded in the Theoretical Domains Framework was conducted with an initial provider survey, followed by semi-structured interview of a purposeful sub-sample of providers. The survey was distributed via REDCap and interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim.

Results

A total of 140 PCP’s responded to the survey (response rate 37.63 %) and 17 participated in interviews. The average knowledge score of the correct selection of DSMES referral time points was 70.35 %. Five themes emerged in provider interviews: procedural knowledge, ability, beliefs, reinforcement, and cultural norms. Providers wanted bidirectional communication with the DSMES program and were more likely to refer if they had a cultural norm of referring.

Conclusion

Providers have limited knowledge of the appropriate time to refer to DSMES but expressed a willingness to refer. They emphasized the importance of providing their patients with appropriate self-management education and support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Primary Care Diabetes
Primary Care Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
134
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research articles and high quality reviews in the fields of clinical care, diabetes education, nutrition, health services, psychosocial research and epidemiology and other areas as far as is relevant for diabetology in a primary-care setting. The purpose of the journal is to encourage interdisciplinary research and discussion between all those who are involved in primary diabetes care on an international level. The Journal also publishes news and articles concerning the policies and activities of Primary Care Diabetes Europe and reflects the society''s aim of improving the care for people with diabetes mellitus within the primary-care setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信