{"title":"超声弹性成像和孕酮受体蛋白在子宫肌瘤诊断和预后评估中的价值。","authors":"Jia Zhao, Yuanyuan Li, Lingxue Cui","doi":"10.5603/gpl.99642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to study the values of ultrasound elastography (UE) and progesterone receptor (PR) proteins for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of uterine fibroid (UF).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 200 UF patients treated from January 2020 to June 2023 were selected as a UF group, and another 100 healthy women as a healthy group. Routine ultrasound parameters uterine artery pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), and UE parameter strain ratio (SR) were obtained. The relative protein expressions of PRA and PRB in the peripheral blood were detected by Western blotting. The differences in these parameters and relative protein expressions of PRA and PRB were compared. The UF patients were divided into a cure group (n = 159) and a recurrence group (n = 41) according to their prognosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The protein expressions of PRA and PRB in the UF group were higher than those in the healthy group (p < 0.05). In the recurrence group, PI and RI were lower, while SR and the protein expressions of PRA and PRB were higher than those in the cure group (p < 0.05). Age at menarche < 13 years old, intramural fibroid, PI, RI, SR, PRA, and PRB were risk factors for recurrence in UF patients (p < 0.05). The efficiency of combination of ultrasound and UE parameters, PRA and PRB for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of UF was significantly higher than that of any single indicator ( p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound and UE parameters combined with PR proteins have high efficiency for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of UF.</p>","PeriodicalId":94021,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Values of ultrasound elastography and progesterone receptor proteins for diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of uterine fibroid.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Zhao, Yuanyuan Li, Lingxue Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/gpl.99642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to study the values of ultrasound elastography (UE) and progesterone receptor (PR) proteins for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of uterine fibroid (UF).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 200 UF patients treated from January 2020 to June 2023 were selected as a UF group, and another 100 healthy women as a healthy group. Routine ultrasound parameters uterine artery pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), and UE parameter strain ratio (SR) were obtained. The relative protein expressions of PRA and PRB in the peripheral blood were detected by Western blotting. The differences in these parameters and relative protein expressions of PRA and PRB were compared. The UF patients were divided into a cure group (n = 159) and a recurrence group (n = 41) according to their prognosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The protein expressions of PRA and PRB in the UF group were higher than those in the healthy group (p < 0.05). In the recurrence group, PI and RI were lower, while SR and the protein expressions of PRA and PRB were higher than those in the cure group (p < 0.05). Age at menarche < 13 years old, intramural fibroid, PI, RI, SR, PRA, and PRB were risk factors for recurrence in UF patients (p < 0.05). The efficiency of combination of ultrasound and UE parameters, PRA and PRB for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of UF was significantly higher than that of any single indicator ( p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound and UE parameters combined with PR proteins have high efficiency for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of UF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.99642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.99642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的我们旨在研究超声弹性成像(UE)和孕酮受体(PR)蛋白在子宫肌瘤(UF)诊断和预后评估中的价值:选取2020年1月至2023年6月期间接受治疗的200例子宫肌瘤患者作为子宫肌瘤组,另外100例健康女性作为健康组。获得常规超声参数子宫动脉搏动指数(PI)、阻力指数(RI)和 UE 参数应变比(SR)。用 Western 印迹法检测外周血中 PRA 和 PRB 的相对蛋白表达。比较了这些参数的差异以及 PRA 和 PRB 的相对蛋白表达。根据预后将 UF 患者分为治愈组(n = 159)和复发组(n = 41):尿毒症组 PRA 和 PRB 蛋白表达高于健康组(P < 0.05)。复发组的 PI 和 RI 较低,而 SR 以及 PRA 和 PRB 的蛋白表达量高于治愈组(P < 0.05)。月经初潮年龄小于 13 岁、肌壁内肌瘤、PI、RI、SR、PRA 和 PRB 是 UF 患者复发的危险因素(P < 0.05)。超声和 UE 参数、PRA 和 PRB 联合用于 UF 诊断和预后评估的效率明显高于任何单一指标(P < 0.05):结论:超声和超音波参数结合 PR 蛋白对尿毒症的诊断和预后评估具有较高的效率。
Values of ultrasound elastography and progesterone receptor proteins for diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of uterine fibroid.
Objectives: We aimed to study the values of ultrasound elastography (UE) and progesterone receptor (PR) proteins for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of uterine fibroid (UF).
Material and methods: A total of 200 UF patients treated from January 2020 to June 2023 were selected as a UF group, and another 100 healthy women as a healthy group. Routine ultrasound parameters uterine artery pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), and UE parameter strain ratio (SR) were obtained. The relative protein expressions of PRA and PRB in the peripheral blood were detected by Western blotting. The differences in these parameters and relative protein expressions of PRA and PRB were compared. The UF patients were divided into a cure group (n = 159) and a recurrence group (n = 41) according to their prognosis.
Results: The protein expressions of PRA and PRB in the UF group were higher than those in the healthy group (p < 0.05). In the recurrence group, PI and RI were lower, while SR and the protein expressions of PRA and PRB were higher than those in the cure group (p < 0.05). Age at menarche < 13 years old, intramural fibroid, PI, RI, SR, PRA, and PRB were risk factors for recurrence in UF patients (p < 0.05). The efficiency of combination of ultrasound and UE parameters, PRA and PRB for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of UF was significantly higher than that of any single indicator ( p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Ultrasound and UE parameters combined with PR proteins have high efficiency for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of UF.