在原发性开角型青光眼中比较 STREAMLINE 光道成形术和小梁微型旁路支架植入术的随机对照试验。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-10-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S481945
Damien F Goldberg, Claudio Orlich, Brian E Flowers, Inder P Singh, Sydney Tyson, Leonard K Seibold, Mohammed K ElMallah, Elysia M Ison, Med Harbin, Heather Reynolds, Malik Y Kahook
{"title":"在原发性开角型青光眼中比较 STREAMLINE 光道成形术和小梁微型旁路支架植入术的随机对照试验。","authors":"Damien F Goldberg, Claudio Orlich, Brian E Flowers, Inder P Singh, Sydney Tyson, Leonard K Seibold, Mohammed K ElMallah, Elysia M Ison, Med Harbin, Heather Reynolds, Malik Y Kahook","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S481945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report interim results of the VENICE study, a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) comparing STREAMLINE Surgical System (STREAMLINE) canaloplasty with iStent inject W (iStent W) implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) undergoing phacoemulsification.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Safety and efficacy analyses involving the first 72 randomized eyes are included in this report. Following pre- (Screening) and post-medication washout (Eligibility) visits, one eye per subject was randomized 1:1 to STREAMLINE or iStent W after undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Subjects were evaluated postoperatively at Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, 3, and 6. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, number of IOP-lowering medications, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two eyes were randomized; 35 underwent STREAMLINE canaloplasty and 37 were implanted with the iStent W. Seventy eyes completed their 6-month follow-up. Both the mean morning post-washout Baseline IOP between STREAMLINE 24.86±3.05 mmHg and iStent W 25.16±3.41 mmHg and the mean IOP at 6 months between STREAMLINE eyes 16.52±3.63 mmHg and iStent W eyes 16.08±3.19 mmHg were not statistically significantly different (p=0.691 and 0.596, respectively). At 6 months, more eyes were on zero glaucoma medications in the STREAMLINE group (81.8%) compared to the iStent W group (78.4%). In medication-free eyes, the mean IOP was reduced from 24.80±2.79 mmHg to 16.00±3.40 mmHg and 24.60±3.18 mmHg to 15.80±2.21 mmHg in the STREAMLINE and iStent W groups, respectively (p=0.752). Both groups showed reduction in IOP-lowering medications at every visit, compared to pre-washout (Screening), with STREAMLINE resulting in numerically fewer medications 0.20±0.48 compared to iStent W 0.40±0.79 at 6 months (P=0.384). AEs were mild and self-limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, the VENICE trial is the first RCT involving canaloplasty. These interim findings demonstrated comparable IOP and medication reduction between STREAMLINE canaloplasty and iStent W implantation, when combined with phacoemulsification.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing STREAMLINE Canaloplasty to Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent Implantation in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.\",\"authors\":\"Damien F Goldberg, Claudio Orlich, Brian E Flowers, Inder P Singh, Sydney Tyson, Leonard K Seibold, Mohammed K ElMallah, Elysia M Ison, Med Harbin, Heather Reynolds, Malik Y Kahook\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S481945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report interim results of the VENICE study, a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) comparing STREAMLINE Surgical System (STREAMLINE) canaloplasty with iStent inject W (iStent W) implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) undergoing phacoemulsification.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Safety and efficacy analyses involving the first 72 randomized eyes are included in this report. Following pre- (Screening) and post-medication washout (Eligibility) visits, one eye per subject was randomized 1:1 to STREAMLINE or iStent W after undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Subjects were evaluated postoperatively at Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, 3, and 6. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, number of IOP-lowering medications, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two eyes were randomized; 35 underwent STREAMLINE canaloplasty and 37 were implanted with the iStent W. Seventy eyes completed their 6-month follow-up. Both the mean morning post-washout Baseline IOP between STREAMLINE 24.86±3.05 mmHg and iStent W 25.16±3.41 mmHg and the mean IOP at 6 months between STREAMLINE eyes 16.52±3.63 mmHg and iStent W eyes 16.08±3.19 mmHg were not statistically significantly different (p=0.691 and 0.596, respectively). At 6 months, more eyes were on zero glaucoma medications in the STREAMLINE group (81.8%) compared to the iStent W group (78.4%). In medication-free eyes, the mean IOP was reduced from 24.80±2.79 mmHg to 16.00±3.40 mmHg and 24.60±3.18 mmHg to 15.80±2.21 mmHg in the STREAMLINE and iStent W groups, respectively (p=0.752). Both groups showed reduction in IOP-lowering medications at every visit, compared to pre-washout (Screening), with STREAMLINE resulting in numerically fewer medications 0.20±0.48 compared to iStent W 0.40±0.79 at 6 months (P=0.384). AEs were mild and self-limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, the VENICE trial is the first RCT involving canaloplasty. These interim findings demonstrated comparable IOP and medication reduction between STREAMLINE canaloplasty and iStent W implantation, when combined with phacoemulsification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491083/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S481945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S481945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:报告 VENICE 研究的中期结果,该研究是一项多中心随机对照试验 (RCT),在接受超声乳化术的轻度至中度原发性开角型青光眼 (POAG) 患者中比较了 STREAMLINE 手术系统 (STREAMLINE) 导管成形术和 iStent inject W (iStent W) 植入术:本报告包括对首批 72 只随机眼进行的安全性和有效性分析。在进行术前(筛查)和术后药物冲洗(资格)检查后,每名受试者的一只眼在接受无并发症的超声乳化术后按 1:1 随机分配到 STREAMLINE 或 iStent W。受试者在术后第 1 天、第 1 周、第 1 个月、第 3 个月和第 6 个月接受评估。在每次随访时对眼压(IOP)测量值、降眼压药物的使用次数以及不良事件(AEs)进行评估:72只眼睛被随机选中,其中35只接受了STREAMLINE晶体管成形术,37只植入了iStent W。STREAMLINE 24.86±3.05 mmHg 和 iStent W 25.16±3.41 mmHg 之间的早晨冲洗后平均基线眼压以及 STREAMLINE 16.52±3.63 mmHg 和 iStent W 16.08±3.19 mmHg 之间的 6 个月平均眼压在统计学上没有显著差异(分别为 p=0.691 和 0.596)。6 个月时,STREAMLINE 组(81.8%)与 iStent W 组(78.4%)相比,有更多的眼睛没有使用青光眼药物。在无药物治疗的眼睛中,STREAMLINE 组和 iStent W 组的平均眼压分别从 24.80±2.79 mmHg 降至 16.00±3.40 mmHg 和 24.60±3.18 mmHg 降至 15.80±2.21 mmHg(P=0.752)。与冲洗前(筛查)相比,两组患者每次就诊时的降眼压药物用量都有所减少,6个月时,STREAMLINE组的药物用量为0.20±0.48,而iStent W组为0.40±0.79(P=0.384)。AEs轻微且有自限性:据我们所知,VENICE 试验是首个涉及管成形术的 RCT。这些中期研究结果表明,在结合超声乳化术的情况下,STREAMLINE 管成形术和 iStent W 植入术在降低眼压和减少用药量方面具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing STREAMLINE Canaloplasty to Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent Implantation in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Purpose: To report interim results of the VENICE study, a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) comparing STREAMLINE Surgical System (STREAMLINE) canaloplasty with iStent inject W (iStent W) implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) undergoing phacoemulsification.

Patients and methods: Safety and efficacy analyses involving the first 72 randomized eyes are included in this report. Following pre- (Screening) and post-medication washout (Eligibility) visits, one eye per subject was randomized 1:1 to STREAMLINE or iStent W after undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Subjects were evaluated postoperatively at Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, 3, and 6. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, number of IOP-lowering medications, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each follow-up visit.

Results: Seventy-two eyes were randomized; 35 underwent STREAMLINE canaloplasty and 37 were implanted with the iStent W. Seventy eyes completed their 6-month follow-up. Both the mean morning post-washout Baseline IOP between STREAMLINE 24.86±3.05 mmHg and iStent W 25.16±3.41 mmHg and the mean IOP at 6 months between STREAMLINE eyes 16.52±3.63 mmHg and iStent W eyes 16.08±3.19 mmHg were not statistically significantly different (p=0.691 and 0.596, respectively). At 6 months, more eyes were on zero glaucoma medications in the STREAMLINE group (81.8%) compared to the iStent W group (78.4%). In medication-free eyes, the mean IOP was reduced from 24.80±2.79 mmHg to 16.00±3.40 mmHg and 24.60±3.18 mmHg to 15.80±2.21 mmHg in the STREAMLINE and iStent W groups, respectively (p=0.752). Both groups showed reduction in IOP-lowering medications at every visit, compared to pre-washout (Screening), with STREAMLINE resulting in numerically fewer medications 0.20±0.48 compared to iStent W 0.40±0.79 at 6 months (P=0.384). AEs were mild and self-limited.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, the VENICE trial is the first RCT involving canaloplasty. These interim findings demonstrated comparable IOP and medication reduction between STREAMLINE canaloplasty and iStent W implantation, when combined with phacoemulsification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信