中国浙江癌症和非癌症人群全血 Epstein-Barr 病毒水平的差异。

Qing Jun Jia, Meichun Zeng, Qi Chen
{"title":"中国浙江癌症和非癌症人群全血 Epstein-Barr 病毒水平的差异。","authors":"Qing Jun Jia, Meichun Zeng, Qi Chen","doi":"10.3967/bes2024.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in patients with and without cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 26,648 participants who underwent whole-blood EBV DNA (WBEBV) assays between January 1, 2020, and August 31, 2023, were included. The chi-square test was used for categorical data analysis, and R software was used to analyze the differences in EBV DNA load levels and the diagnostic capabilities of WBEBV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive rates were 10.2% and 25.4% for healthy controls (HC) and patients, respectively. The positivity rate for EBV-associated neoplasms (EN) was the highest at 7.53%, followed by leukemia (Le) at 5.49%. The subgroup analysis showed that the positivity rate for abnormal proliferation or hyperplasia (APH) was 31.9%, followed by 30.5% for Le. The WBEBV of patients with transplants (TP), especially living-related transplants (LT), was the highest among all subgroups. WBEBV at diagnosis was used to differentiate between infectious mononucleosis (IM) and chronic active Epstein-Barr virus (CAEBV), with a sensitivity of 67.4% (95% confidence interval [ <i>CI</i>]: 57.6-75.8) and specificity of 72% (95% <i>CI</i>: 63.3-79.3). We conclude that the prevalence of EBV infection is low in the healthy population in this region and that a high EBV load at baseline is more common in LT, IM, and Lymphocyte Leukemia (LL).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study used a large-sample survey to characterize the prevalence of whole-blood EBV levels in various diseases, including the stages and subtypes. The EBV detection rate was higher in patients with malignant disease than in those with benign disease. Our study provides clinicians with baseline information regarding EBV-associated diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":93903,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in the Levels of Whole-Blood Epstein-Barr Virus between the Cancer and Non-Cancer Populations in Zhejiang, China.\",\"authors\":\"Qing Jun Jia, Meichun Zeng, Qi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.3967/bes2024.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in patients with and without cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 26,648 participants who underwent whole-blood EBV DNA (WBEBV) assays between January 1, 2020, and August 31, 2023, were included. The chi-square test was used for categorical data analysis, and R software was used to analyze the differences in EBV DNA load levels and the diagnostic capabilities of WBEBV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive rates were 10.2% and 25.4% for healthy controls (HC) and patients, respectively. The positivity rate for EBV-associated neoplasms (EN) was the highest at 7.53%, followed by leukemia (Le) at 5.49%. The subgroup analysis showed that the positivity rate for abnormal proliferation or hyperplasia (APH) was 31.9%, followed by 30.5% for Le. The WBEBV of patients with transplants (TP), especially living-related transplants (LT), was the highest among all subgroups. WBEBV at diagnosis was used to differentiate between infectious mononucleosis (IM) and chronic active Epstein-Barr virus (CAEBV), with a sensitivity of 67.4% (95% confidence interval [ <i>CI</i>]: 57.6-75.8) and specificity of 72% (95% <i>CI</i>: 63.3-79.3). We conclude that the prevalence of EBV infection is low in the healthy population in this region and that a high EBV load at baseline is more common in LT, IM, and Lymphocyte Leukemia (LL).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study used a large-sample survey to characterize the prevalence of whole-blood EBV levels in various diseases, including the stages and subtypes. The EBV detection rate was higher in patients with malignant disease than in those with benign disease. Our study provides clinicians with baseline information regarding EBV-associated diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2024.101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2024.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在调查癌症患者和非癌症患者的爱泼斯坦-巴氏病毒(EBV)感染率:共纳入了在 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 8 月 31 日期间接受过全血 EBV DNA(WBEBV)检测的 26648 名参与者。采用卡方检验进行分类数据分析,并使用 R 软件分析 EBV DNA 负载水平的差异和 WBEBV 的诊断能力:健康对照组(HC)和患者的阳性率分别为 10.2% 和 25.4%。EBV相关肿瘤(EN)的阳性率最高,为7.53%,其次是白血病(Le),为5.49%。亚组分析显示,异常增殖或增生(APH)的阳性率为 31.9%,其次是白血病(Le),阳性率为 30.5%。在所有亚组中,移植(TP)患者,尤其是活体相关移植(LT)患者的 WBEBV 值最高。诊断时的 WBEBV 可用于区分传染性单核细胞增多症(IM)和慢性活动性爱泼斯坦-巴氏病毒(CAEBV),敏感性为 67.4%(95% 置信区间[CI]:57.6-75.8),特异性为 72%(95% 置信区间:63.3-79.3)。我们的结论是,该地区健康人群的 EBV 感染率较低,基线 EBV 高载量在 LT、IM 和淋巴细胞白血病(LL)中更为常见:本研究采用大样本调查的方法,描述了各种疾病(包括分期和亚型)的全血 EBV 感染率。恶性疾病患者的 EBV 检出率高于良性疾病患者。我们的研究为临床医生提供了有关 EBV 相关疾病的基础信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in the Levels of Whole-Blood Epstein-Barr Virus between the Cancer and Non-Cancer Populations in Zhejiang, China.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in patients with and without cancer.

Methods: A total of 26,648 participants who underwent whole-blood EBV DNA (WBEBV) assays between January 1, 2020, and August 31, 2023, were included. The chi-square test was used for categorical data analysis, and R software was used to analyze the differences in EBV DNA load levels and the diagnostic capabilities of WBEBV.

Results: Positive rates were 10.2% and 25.4% for healthy controls (HC) and patients, respectively. The positivity rate for EBV-associated neoplasms (EN) was the highest at 7.53%, followed by leukemia (Le) at 5.49%. The subgroup analysis showed that the positivity rate for abnormal proliferation or hyperplasia (APH) was 31.9%, followed by 30.5% for Le. The WBEBV of patients with transplants (TP), especially living-related transplants (LT), was the highest among all subgroups. WBEBV at diagnosis was used to differentiate between infectious mononucleosis (IM) and chronic active Epstein-Barr virus (CAEBV), with a sensitivity of 67.4% (95% confidence interval [ CI]: 57.6-75.8) and specificity of 72% (95% CI: 63.3-79.3). We conclude that the prevalence of EBV infection is low in the healthy population in this region and that a high EBV load at baseline is more common in LT, IM, and Lymphocyte Leukemia (LL).

Conclusion: This study used a large-sample survey to characterize the prevalence of whole-blood EBV levels in various diseases, including the stages and subtypes. The EBV detection rate was higher in patients with malignant disease than in those with benign disease. Our study provides clinicians with baseline information regarding EBV-associated diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信