生物医学和制药科学在药学教育和实践中的作用。

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
W. Cary Mobley , Marc W. Harrold , Julianne M. Hall , Marcos A. Oliveira , Timothy J. Bloom
{"title":"生物医学和制药科学在药学教育和实践中的作用。","authors":"W. Cary Mobley ,&nbsp;Marc W. Harrold ,&nbsp;Julianne M. Hall ,&nbsp;Marcos A. Oliveira ,&nbsp;Timothy J. Bloom","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A current major topic of conversation in academic pharmacy is “curricular hoarding,” the overloading of the curriculum due to the steady addition of required knowledge and skills without a concomitant subtraction of existing content. It can be tempting to consider addressing hoarding by just reducing content in the foundational biomedical and pharmaceutical sciences or by shifting some foundational content into prerequisites for admission into the Doctor of Pharmacy program. The health care education literature suggests that this approach would negatively impact the development of the critical and clinical thinking skills needed by a modern pharmacist. This commentary is intended to inform conversations on curricular hoarding by affirming and demonstrating the reliance of pharmacists’ clinical and critical thinking on the scientific concepts of the biomedical and pharmaceutical science disciplines and reiterating the importance to the practicing pharmacist of a deep understanding of these concepts, conferred through a careful and intentional educational integration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"88 12","pages":"Article 101312"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences in Pharmacy Education and Practice\",\"authors\":\"W. Cary Mobley ,&nbsp;Marc W. Harrold ,&nbsp;Julianne M. Hall ,&nbsp;Marcos A. Oliveira ,&nbsp;Timothy J. Bloom\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A current major topic of conversation in academic pharmacy is “curricular hoarding,” the overloading of the curriculum due to the steady addition of required knowledge and skills without a concomitant subtraction of existing content. It can be tempting to consider addressing hoarding by just reducing content in the foundational biomedical and pharmaceutical sciences or by shifting some foundational content into prerequisites for admission into the Doctor of Pharmacy program. The health care education literature suggests that this approach would negatively impact the development of the critical and clinical thinking skills needed by a modern pharmacist. This commentary is intended to inform conversations on curricular hoarding by affirming and demonstrating the reliance of pharmacists’ clinical and critical thinking on the scientific concepts of the biomedical and pharmaceutical science disciplines and reiterating the importance to the practicing pharmacist of a deep understanding of these concepts, conferred through a careful and intentional educational integration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"88 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 101312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110315\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,药学学术界的一个主要话题是 "课程囤积",即由于不断增加所需的知识和技能,而没有同时减少现有的内容,导致课程负担过重。人们很容易考虑通过减少基础生物医学和制药科学的内容,或将一些基础内容转为药学博士课程的入学先修课程来解决囤积问题。医疗保健教育文献表明,这种方法会对现代药剂师所需的批判性思维和临床思维能力的培养产生负面影响。本评论旨在通过肯定和证明药剂师的临床和批判性思维依赖于生物医学和制药科学学科的科学概念,并重申通过精心和有意的教育整合而获得的对这些概念的深刻理解对执业药剂师的重要性,从而为有关课程囤积的对话提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences in Pharmacy Education and Practice
A current major topic of conversation in academic pharmacy is “curricular hoarding,” the overloading of the curriculum due to the steady addition of required knowledge and skills without a concomitant subtraction of existing content. It can be tempting to consider addressing hoarding by just reducing content in the foundational biomedical and pharmaceutical sciences or by shifting some foundational content into prerequisites for admission into the Doctor of Pharmacy program. The health care education literature suggests that this approach would negatively impact the development of the critical and clinical thinking skills needed by a modern pharmacist. This commentary is intended to inform conversations on curricular hoarding by affirming and demonstrating the reliance of pharmacists’ clinical and critical thinking on the scientific concepts of the biomedical and pharmaceutical science disciplines and reiterating the importance to the practicing pharmacist of a deep understanding of these concepts, conferred through a careful and intentional educational integration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信