W. Cary Mobley , Marc W. Harrold , Julianne M. Hall , Marcos A. Oliveira , Timothy J. Bloom
{"title":"生物医学和制药科学在药学教育和实践中的作用。","authors":"W. Cary Mobley , Marc W. Harrold , Julianne M. Hall , Marcos A. Oliveira , Timothy J. Bloom","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A current major topic of conversation in academic pharmacy is “curricular hoarding,” the overloading of the curriculum due to the steady addition of required knowledge and skills without a concomitant subtraction of existing content. It can be tempting to consider addressing hoarding by just reducing content in the foundational biomedical and pharmaceutical sciences or by shifting some foundational content into prerequisites for admission into the Doctor of Pharmacy program. The health care education literature suggests that this approach would negatively impact the development of the critical and clinical thinking skills needed by a modern pharmacist. This commentary is intended to inform conversations on curricular hoarding by affirming and demonstrating the reliance of pharmacists’ clinical and critical thinking on the scientific concepts of the biomedical and pharmaceutical science disciplines and reiterating the importance to the practicing pharmacist of a deep understanding of these concepts, conferred through a careful and intentional educational integration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"88 12","pages":"Article 101312"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences in Pharmacy Education and Practice\",\"authors\":\"W. Cary Mobley , Marc W. Harrold , Julianne M. Hall , Marcos A. Oliveira , Timothy J. Bloom\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A current major topic of conversation in academic pharmacy is “curricular hoarding,” the overloading of the curriculum due to the steady addition of required knowledge and skills without a concomitant subtraction of existing content. It can be tempting to consider addressing hoarding by just reducing content in the foundational biomedical and pharmaceutical sciences or by shifting some foundational content into prerequisites for admission into the Doctor of Pharmacy program. The health care education literature suggests that this approach would negatively impact the development of the critical and clinical thinking skills needed by a modern pharmacist. This commentary is intended to inform conversations on curricular hoarding by affirming and demonstrating the reliance of pharmacists’ clinical and critical thinking on the scientific concepts of the biomedical and pharmaceutical science disciplines and reiterating the importance to the practicing pharmacist of a deep understanding of these concepts, conferred through a careful and intentional educational integration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"88 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 101312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110315\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Role of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences in Pharmacy Education and Practice
A current major topic of conversation in academic pharmacy is “curricular hoarding,” the overloading of the curriculum due to the steady addition of required knowledge and skills without a concomitant subtraction of existing content. It can be tempting to consider addressing hoarding by just reducing content in the foundational biomedical and pharmaceutical sciences or by shifting some foundational content into prerequisites for admission into the Doctor of Pharmacy program. The health care education literature suggests that this approach would negatively impact the development of the critical and clinical thinking skills needed by a modern pharmacist. This commentary is intended to inform conversations on curricular hoarding by affirming and demonstrating the reliance of pharmacists’ clinical and critical thinking on the scientific concepts of the biomedical and pharmaceutical science disciplines and reiterating the importance to the practicing pharmacist of a deep understanding of these concepts, conferred through a careful and intentional educational integration.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.