基层医疗中心远程皮肤科与医院面对面皮肤科咨询的成本效用分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Public Health Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1111/phn.13438
Antonio Lopez-Villegas, Rafael Jesus Bautista-Mesa, Remedios Lopez-Liria, Mercedes Perez-Heredia, Carlos Javier Hernandez-Montoya, Maria Gador Gutierrez-Maldonado, Cesar Leal-Costa, Salvador Peiro
{"title":"基层医疗中心远程皮肤科与医院面对面皮肤科咨询的成本效用分析。","authors":"Antonio Lopez-Villegas, Rafael Jesus Bautista-Mesa, Remedios Lopez-Liria, Mercedes Perez-Heredia, Carlos Javier Hernandez-Montoya, Maria Gador Gutierrez-Maldonado, Cesar Leal-Costa, Salvador Peiro","doi":"10.1111/phn.13438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform an economic evaluation to determine whether or not teledermatology (TD) units in primary care (PC) centers offer an alternative in terms of cost-utility and cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to conventional dermatology consultations (face-to-face dermatology [F-F/D]) at the hospital from the perspective of the Public Health System (PHS) and the patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a randomized, controlled, nonblinded, and multicenter study. During 6 months, data from 450 patients (TD: 225 vs. F-F/D: 225) were collected. From both perspectives, costs, quality of life, and costs per QALYs were analyzed. The QALY scores were estimated from the EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ5D-5L) questionnaire responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the perspective of the PHS, the cost per patient was 53.04% lower in the TD group (p < 0.001). Hospital visits decreased by 72.43% in the TD group (p < 0.001). From the patients' perspective, TD reduced costs per patient by 77.59% (p < 0.001). The cost per QALY was 63.34% higher in the F-F/D group (p < 0.001). The TD group's total costs were 56.34% lower (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients in the TD group gained 0.05 QALYs more than those in the F-F/D group (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that TD units in PC represent a significant cost-effective alternative to conventional hospital follow-up. To enhance TD in PC, it is important to introduce remote consultation platforms incorporating artificial intelligence for prediagnosis. This will enable general practitioners and nurses to make more accurate initial assessments. It is also crucial to provide thorough training to healthcare personnel using these technologies to ensure more efficient and personalized care. Public health nurses will benefit from gaining new skills in managing digital tools, which will help in the early identification of dermatological diseases and reduce unnecessary referrals to specialists. This will optimize resources and improve response times for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54533,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"419-434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Utility Analysis of Teledermatology Units in Primary Care Centers Versus Face-to-Face Dermatology Consultations in the Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Lopez-Villegas, Rafael Jesus Bautista-Mesa, Remedios Lopez-Liria, Mercedes Perez-Heredia, Carlos Javier Hernandez-Montoya, Maria Gador Gutierrez-Maldonado, Cesar Leal-Costa, Salvador Peiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/phn.13438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform an economic evaluation to determine whether or not teledermatology (TD) units in primary care (PC) centers offer an alternative in terms of cost-utility and cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to conventional dermatology consultations (face-to-face dermatology [F-F/D]) at the hospital from the perspective of the Public Health System (PHS) and the patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a randomized, controlled, nonblinded, and multicenter study. During 6 months, data from 450 patients (TD: 225 vs. F-F/D: 225) were collected. From both perspectives, costs, quality of life, and costs per QALYs were analyzed. The QALY scores were estimated from the EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ5D-5L) questionnaire responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the perspective of the PHS, the cost per patient was 53.04% lower in the TD group (p < 0.001). Hospital visits decreased by 72.43% in the TD group (p < 0.001). From the patients' perspective, TD reduced costs per patient by 77.59% (p < 0.001). The cost per QALY was 63.34% higher in the F-F/D group (p < 0.001). The TD group's total costs were 56.34% lower (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients in the TD group gained 0.05 QALYs more than those in the F-F/D group (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that TD units in PC represent a significant cost-effective alternative to conventional hospital follow-up. To enhance TD in PC, it is important to introduce remote consultation platforms incorporating artificial intelligence for prediagnosis. This will enable general practitioners and nurses to make more accurate initial assessments. It is also crucial to provide thorough training to healthcare personnel using these technologies to ensure more efficient and personalized care. Public health nurses will benefit from gaining new skills in managing digital tools, which will help in the early identification of dermatological diseases and reduce unnecessary referrals to specialists. This will optimize resources and improve response times for patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"419-434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13438\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的从公共卫生系统(PHS)和患者的角度出发,进行一项经济评估,以确定初级保健(PC)中心的远程皮肤科(TD)是否能在成本效用和单位质量调整生命年(QALYs)成本方面替代医院的传统皮肤科会诊(面对面皮肤科[F-F/D]):这是一项随机、对照、非盲多中心研究。在 6 个月的时间里,收集了 450 名患者(TD:225 对 F-F/D:225)的数据。从两个角度分析了成本、生活质量和每 QALYs 成本。QALY评分是根据EuroQol-5D-5L(EQ5D-5L)问卷调查结果估算得出的:结果:从公共卫生服务的角度来看,TD 组患者的人均成本降低了 53.04%(P < 0.001)。治疗组的住院人次减少了 72.43%(p < 0.001)。从患者的角度来看,运输署使每位患者的成本降低了 77.59% (p < 0.001)。F-F/D组的每QALY成本高出63.34%(p < 0.001)。TD 组的总成本降低了 56.34%(p < 0.001)。此外,TD 组患者比 F-F/D 组患者多获得 0.05 QALYs(p = 0.004):这项研究表明,PC 中的 TD 单元是替代传统医院随访的一种极具成本效益的方法。为加强 PC 中的 TD,必须引入结合人工智能的远程会诊平台进行预诊。这将使全科医生和护士能够做出更准确的初步评估。同样重要的是,要为使用这些技术的医护人员提供全面培训,以确保提供更高效和个性化的护理。公共卫生护士将受益于获得管理数字工具的新技能,这将有助于及早发现皮肤病,减少不必要的专家转诊。这将优化资源,缩短对病人的响应时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-Utility Analysis of Teledermatology Units in Primary Care Centers Versus Face-to-Face Dermatology Consultations in the Hospital.

Objective: To perform an economic evaluation to determine whether or not teledermatology (TD) units in primary care (PC) centers offer an alternative in terms of cost-utility and cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to conventional dermatology consultations (face-to-face dermatology [F-F/D]) at the hospital from the perspective of the Public Health System (PHS) and the patients.

Methods: This is a randomized, controlled, nonblinded, and multicenter study. During 6 months, data from 450 patients (TD: 225 vs. F-F/D: 225) were collected. From both perspectives, costs, quality of life, and costs per QALYs were analyzed. The QALY scores were estimated from the EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ5D-5L) questionnaire responses.

Results: From the perspective of the PHS, the cost per patient was 53.04% lower in the TD group (p < 0.001). Hospital visits decreased by 72.43% in the TD group (p < 0.001). From the patients' perspective, TD reduced costs per patient by 77.59% (p < 0.001). The cost per QALY was 63.34% higher in the F-F/D group (p < 0.001). The TD group's total costs were 56.34% lower (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients in the TD group gained 0.05 QALYs more than those in the F-F/D group (p = 0.004).

Conclusions: This study shows that TD units in PC represent a significant cost-effective alternative to conventional hospital follow-up. To enhance TD in PC, it is important to introduce remote consultation platforms incorporating artificial intelligence for prediagnosis. This will enable general practitioners and nurses to make more accurate initial assessments. It is also crucial to provide thorough training to healthcare personnel using these technologies to ensure more efficient and personalized care. Public health nurses will benefit from gaining new skills in managing digital tools, which will help in the early identification of dermatological diseases and reduce unnecessary referrals to specialists. This will optimize resources and improve response times for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nursing
Public Health Nursing 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Nursing publishes empirical research reports, program evaluations, and case reports focused on populations at risk across the lifespan. The journal also prints articles related to developments in practice, education of public health nurses, theory development, methodological innovations, legal, ethical, and public policy issues in public health, and the history of public health nursing throughout the world. While the primary readership of the Journal is North American, the journal is expanding its mission to address global public health concerns of interest to nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信