对巴西单基因糖尿病研究小组(BRASMOD)和巴西 1 型糖尿病研究小组(BrazDiab1SG)的 2,989 名患者进行 GCK-MODY 临床筛查。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-07-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0314
Renata Peixoto-Barbosa, Luis Eduardo Calliari, Felipe Crispim, Regina S Moisés, Sergio A Dib, André F Reis, Fernando M A Giuffrida
{"title":"对巴西单基因糖尿病研究小组(BRASMOD)和巴西 1 型糖尿病研究小组(BrazDiab1SG)的 2,989 名患者进行 GCK-MODY 临床筛查。","authors":"Renata Peixoto-Barbosa, Luis Eduardo Calliari, Felipe Crispim, Regina S Moisés, Sergio A Dib, André F Reis, Fernando M A Giuffrida","doi":"10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of routinely available parameters in screening for GCK maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), leveraging data from two large cohorts - one of patients with GCK-MODY and the other of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 2,687 patients with T1D, 202 patients with clinical features of MODY but without associated genetic variants (NoVar), and 100 patients with GCK-MODY (GCK). Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) analyses were used to assess the performance of each parameter - both alone and incorporated into regression models - in discriminating between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best parameter discriminating between GCK-MODY and T1D was a multivariable model comprising glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, age at diagnosis, hypertension, microvascular complications, previous diabetic ketoacidosis, and family history of diabetes. This model had a ROC-AUC value of 0.980 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.974-0.985) and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of 43.74% and 100%, respectively. The best model discriminating between GCK and NoVar included HbA1c, age at diagnosis, hypertension, and triglycerides and had a ROC-AUC value of 0.850 (95% CI 0.783-0.916), PPV of 88.36%, and NPV of 97.7%; however, this model was not significantly different from the others. A novel GCK variant was also described in one individual with MODY (7-44192948-T-C, p.Ser54Gly), which showed evidence of pathogenicity on in silico prediction tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified a highly accurate (98%) composite model for differentiating GCK-MODY and T1D. This model may help clinicians select patients for genetic evaluation of monogenic diabetes, enabling them to implement correct treatment without overusing limited resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":54303,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism","volume":"68 ","pages":"e230314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11326741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical screening for GCK-MODY in 2,989 patients from the Brazilian Monogenic Diabetes Study Group (BRASMOD) and the Brazilian Type 1 Diabetes Study Group (BrazDiab1SG).\",\"authors\":\"Renata Peixoto-Barbosa, Luis Eduardo Calliari, Felipe Crispim, Regina S Moisés, Sergio A Dib, André F Reis, Fernando M A Giuffrida\",\"doi\":\"10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of routinely available parameters in screening for GCK maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), leveraging data from two large cohorts - one of patients with GCK-MODY and the other of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 2,687 patients with T1D, 202 patients with clinical features of MODY but without associated genetic variants (NoVar), and 100 patients with GCK-MODY (GCK). Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) analyses were used to assess the performance of each parameter - both alone and incorporated into regression models - in discriminating between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best parameter discriminating between GCK-MODY and T1D was a multivariable model comprising glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, age at diagnosis, hypertension, microvascular complications, previous diabetic ketoacidosis, and family history of diabetes. This model had a ROC-AUC value of 0.980 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.974-0.985) and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of 43.74% and 100%, respectively. The best model discriminating between GCK and NoVar included HbA1c, age at diagnosis, hypertension, and triglycerides and had a ROC-AUC value of 0.850 (95% CI 0.783-0.916), PPV of 88.36%, and NPV of 97.7%; however, this model was not significantly different from the others. A novel GCK variant was also described in one individual with MODY (7-44192948-T-C, p.Ser54Gly), which showed evidence of pathogenicity on in silico prediction tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified a highly accurate (98%) composite model for differentiating GCK-MODY and T1D. This model may help clinicians select patients for genetic evaluation of monogenic diabetes, enabling them to implement correct treatment without overusing limited resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"e230314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11326741/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0314\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的利用两个大型队列--一个是 GCK-MODY 患者队列,另一个是 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者队列--的数据,评估常规可用参数在筛查 GCK 成熟-发病型青年糖尿病(MODY)方面的准确性:研究对象包括 2,687 名 T1D 患者、202 名具有 MODY 临床特征但无相关基因变异的患者(NoVar)和 100 名 GCK-MODY 患者(GCK)。接受者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)分析用于评估各参数(单独或纳入回归模型)在区分组别方面的性能:结果:区分 GCK-MODY 和 T1D 的最佳参数是由糖化血红蛋白 (HbA1c)、空腹血浆葡萄糖、诊断年龄、高血压、微血管并发症、既往糖尿病酮症酸中毒和糖尿病家族史组成的多变量模型。该模型的 ROC-AUC 值为 0.980(95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.974-0.985),阳性(PPV)和阴性(NPV)预测值分别为 43.74% 和 100%。区分 GCK 和 NoVar 的最佳模型包括 HbA1c、诊断年龄、高血压和甘油三酯,其 ROC-AUC 值为 0.850(95% CI 0.783-0.916),PPV 为 88.36%,NPV 为 97.7%;但是,该模型与其他模型没有显著差异。在一名 MODY 患者身上还发现了一个新的 GCK 变体(7-44192948-T-C,p.Ser54Gly),该变体在硅预测工具中显示出致病性:结论:这项研究发现了一个区分 GCK-MODY 和 T1D 的高准确率(98%)复合模型。该模型可帮助临床医生选择患者进行单基因糖尿病遗传评估,使他们能够在不过度使用有限资源的情况下实施正确的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical screening for GCK-MODY in 2,989 patients from the Brazilian Monogenic Diabetes Study Group (BRASMOD) and the Brazilian Type 1 Diabetes Study Group (BrazDiab1SG).

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of routinely available parameters in screening for GCK maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), leveraging data from two large cohorts - one of patients with GCK-MODY and the other of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Materials and methods: The study included 2,687 patients with T1D, 202 patients with clinical features of MODY but without associated genetic variants (NoVar), and 100 patients with GCK-MODY (GCK). Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) analyses were used to assess the performance of each parameter - both alone and incorporated into regression models - in discriminating between groups.

Results: The best parameter discriminating between GCK-MODY and T1D was a multivariable model comprising glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, age at diagnosis, hypertension, microvascular complications, previous diabetic ketoacidosis, and family history of diabetes. This model had a ROC-AUC value of 0.980 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.974-0.985) and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of 43.74% and 100%, respectively. The best model discriminating between GCK and NoVar included HbA1c, age at diagnosis, hypertension, and triglycerides and had a ROC-AUC value of 0.850 (95% CI 0.783-0.916), PPV of 88.36%, and NPV of 97.7%; however, this model was not significantly different from the others. A novel GCK variant was also described in one individual with MODY (7-44192948-T-C, p.Ser54Gly), which showed evidence of pathogenicity on in silico prediction tools.

Conclusions: This study identified a highly accurate (98%) composite model for differentiating GCK-MODY and T1D. This model may help clinicians select patients for genetic evaluation of monogenic diabetes, enabling them to implement correct treatment without overusing limited resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism
Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
107
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism - AE&M – is the official journal of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism - SBEM, which is affiliated with the Brazilian Medical Association. Edited since 1951, the AE&M aims at publishing articles on scientific themes in the basic translational and clinical area of Endocrinology and Metabolism. The printed version AE&M is published in 6 issues/year. The full electronic issue is open access in the SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online e at the AE&M site: www.aem-sbem.com. From volume 59 on, the name was changed to Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, and it became mandatory for manuscripts to be submitted in English for the online issue. However, for the printed issue it is still optional for the articles to be sent in English or Portuguese. The journal is published six times a year, with one issue every two months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信