Renata Peixoto-Barbosa, Luis Eduardo Calliari, Felipe Crispim, Regina S Moisés, Sergio A Dib, André F Reis, Fernando M A Giuffrida
{"title":"对巴西单基因糖尿病研究小组(BRASMOD)和巴西 1 型糖尿病研究小组(BrazDiab1SG)的 2,989 名患者进行 GCK-MODY 临床筛查。","authors":"Renata Peixoto-Barbosa, Luis Eduardo Calliari, Felipe Crispim, Regina S Moisés, Sergio A Dib, André F Reis, Fernando M A Giuffrida","doi":"10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of routinely available parameters in screening for GCK maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), leveraging data from two large cohorts - one of patients with GCK-MODY and the other of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 2,687 patients with T1D, 202 patients with clinical features of MODY but without associated genetic variants (NoVar), and 100 patients with GCK-MODY (GCK). Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) analyses were used to assess the performance of each parameter - both alone and incorporated into regression models - in discriminating between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best parameter discriminating between GCK-MODY and T1D was a multivariable model comprising glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, age at diagnosis, hypertension, microvascular complications, previous diabetic ketoacidosis, and family history of diabetes. This model had a ROC-AUC value of 0.980 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.974-0.985) and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of 43.74% and 100%, respectively. The best model discriminating between GCK and NoVar included HbA1c, age at diagnosis, hypertension, and triglycerides and had a ROC-AUC value of 0.850 (95% CI 0.783-0.916), PPV of 88.36%, and NPV of 97.7%; however, this model was not significantly different from the others. A novel GCK variant was also described in one individual with MODY (7-44192948-T-C, p.Ser54Gly), which showed evidence of pathogenicity on in silico prediction tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified a highly accurate (98%) composite model for differentiating GCK-MODY and T1D. This model may help clinicians select patients for genetic evaluation of monogenic diabetes, enabling them to implement correct treatment without overusing limited resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":54303,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism","volume":"68 ","pages":"e230314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11326741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical screening for GCK-MODY in 2,989 patients from the Brazilian Monogenic Diabetes Study Group (BRASMOD) and the Brazilian Type 1 Diabetes Study Group (BrazDiab1SG).\",\"authors\":\"Renata Peixoto-Barbosa, Luis Eduardo Calliari, Felipe Crispim, Regina S Moisés, Sergio A Dib, André F Reis, Fernando M A Giuffrida\",\"doi\":\"10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of routinely available parameters in screening for GCK maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), leveraging data from two large cohorts - one of patients with GCK-MODY and the other of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 2,687 patients with T1D, 202 patients with clinical features of MODY but without associated genetic variants (NoVar), and 100 patients with GCK-MODY (GCK). Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) analyses were used to assess the performance of each parameter - both alone and incorporated into regression models - in discriminating between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best parameter discriminating between GCK-MODY and T1D was a multivariable model comprising glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, age at diagnosis, hypertension, microvascular complications, previous diabetic ketoacidosis, and family history of diabetes. This model had a ROC-AUC value of 0.980 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.974-0.985) and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of 43.74% and 100%, respectively. The best model discriminating between GCK and NoVar included HbA1c, age at diagnosis, hypertension, and triglycerides and had a ROC-AUC value of 0.850 (95% CI 0.783-0.916), PPV of 88.36%, and NPV of 97.7%; however, this model was not significantly different from the others. A novel GCK variant was also described in one individual with MODY (7-44192948-T-C, p.Ser54Gly), which showed evidence of pathogenicity on in silico prediction tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified a highly accurate (98%) composite model for differentiating GCK-MODY and T1D. This model may help clinicians select patients for genetic evaluation of monogenic diabetes, enabling them to implement correct treatment without overusing limited resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"e230314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11326741/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0314\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical screening for GCK-MODY in 2,989 patients from the Brazilian Monogenic Diabetes Study Group (BRASMOD) and the Brazilian Type 1 Diabetes Study Group (BrazDiab1SG).
Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of routinely available parameters in screening for GCK maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), leveraging data from two large cohorts - one of patients with GCK-MODY and the other of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
Materials and methods: The study included 2,687 patients with T1D, 202 patients with clinical features of MODY but without associated genetic variants (NoVar), and 100 patients with GCK-MODY (GCK). Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) analyses were used to assess the performance of each parameter - both alone and incorporated into regression models - in discriminating between groups.
Results: The best parameter discriminating between GCK-MODY and T1D was a multivariable model comprising glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, age at diagnosis, hypertension, microvascular complications, previous diabetic ketoacidosis, and family history of diabetes. This model had a ROC-AUC value of 0.980 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.974-0.985) and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of 43.74% and 100%, respectively. The best model discriminating between GCK and NoVar included HbA1c, age at diagnosis, hypertension, and triglycerides and had a ROC-AUC value of 0.850 (95% CI 0.783-0.916), PPV of 88.36%, and NPV of 97.7%; however, this model was not significantly different from the others. A novel GCK variant was also described in one individual with MODY (7-44192948-T-C, p.Ser54Gly), which showed evidence of pathogenicity on in silico prediction tools.
Conclusions: This study identified a highly accurate (98%) composite model for differentiating GCK-MODY and T1D. This model may help clinicians select patients for genetic evaluation of monogenic diabetes, enabling them to implement correct treatment without overusing limited resources.
期刊介绍:
The Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism - AE&M – is the official journal of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism - SBEM, which is affiliated with the Brazilian Medical Association.
Edited since 1951, the AE&M aims at publishing articles on scientific themes in the basic translational and clinical area of Endocrinology and Metabolism. The printed version AE&M is published in 6 issues/year. The full electronic issue is open access in the SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online e at the AE&M site: www.aem-sbem.com.
From volume 59 on, the name was changed to Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, and it became mandatory for manuscripts to be submitted in English for the online issue. However, for the printed issue it is still optional for the articles to be sent in English or Portuguese.
The journal is published six times a year, with one issue every two months.