Lucio Vilar, Clarice Freitas Vilar, Ruy Lyra, Luciano Albuquerque, Ana Carolina Thé Garrido, Patrícia Sampaio Gadelha, Erik Trovão Diniz, Marcos Almeida, Lucia Helena Cordeiro, Erico Higino de Carvalho, Ana Teresa Bezerra de Melo, Karoline Matias Medeiros, Gabriel Rodrigues de Assis Ferreira, José Coelho Mororó, Daniela Zago Ximenes, Camila Ribeiro Coutinho Madruga, Rosália de Oliveira Nunes, Yanna Queiroz Pereira de Sá, Luciana Ansaneli Naves
{"title":"在一组 770 名患者中,催乳素水平在预测高催乳素血症病因方面的作用。","authors":"Lucio Vilar, Clarice Freitas Vilar, Ruy Lyra, Luciano Albuquerque, Ana Carolina Thé Garrido, Patrícia Sampaio Gadelha, Erik Trovão Diniz, Marcos Almeida, Lucia Helena Cordeiro, Erico Higino de Carvalho, Ana Teresa Bezerra de Melo, Karoline Matias Medeiros, Gabriel Rodrigues de Assis Ferreira, José Coelho Mororó, Daniela Zago Ximenes, Camila Ribeiro Coutinho Madruga, Rosália de Oliveira Nunes, Yanna Queiroz Pereira de Sá, Luciana Ansaneli Naves","doi":"10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determining the etiology of hyperprolactinemia is fundamental for selecting the most appropriate treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness and accuracy of prolactin levels in predicting the etiology of nonphysiological hyperprolactinemia.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we reviewed medical records of patients with nonphysiological hyperprolactinemia seen at two neuroendocrine reference centers located in Recife, Brazil, from January 2000 to December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 770 patients aged 12-73 years (65% female). The three most frequent etiologies of hyperprolactinemia were prolactinomas (n = 263; 34.2%), drug-induced hyperprolactinemia (n = 160; 20.8%), and macroprolactinemia (n = 120; 15.6%). The highest mean prolactin levels were observed in cases of prolactinomas and idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Most patients with hyperprolactinemia due to other etiologies had prolactin levels < 100 ng/mL, but these levels were also found in 16.5% of patients with microproplactinomas and in 20% of those with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Likewise, prolactin levels largely overlapped among patients with microprolactinomas, macroprolactinemia, and drug-induced hyperprolactinemia. Notably, prolactin levels > 250 ng/mL enabled a clear distinction between the etiologies of macroprolactinoma and nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. Moreover, prolactin levels > 500 ng/mL were highly suggestive of macroprolactinomas, although they were also found in very few patients (<2%) with microprolactinomas or drug-induced hyperprolactinemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite considerable overlap in prolactin levels among the different etiologies of hyperprolactinemia, values > 250 ng/mL allowed a clear distinction between macroprolactinomas and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Furthermore, prolactin levels > 500 ng/mL were almost exclusively found in patients with prolactinomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":54303,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism","volume":"68 ","pages":"e230391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of prolactin levels in predicting the etiology of hyperprolactinemia in a cohort of 770 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Lucio Vilar, Clarice Freitas Vilar, Ruy Lyra, Luciano Albuquerque, Ana Carolina Thé Garrido, Patrícia Sampaio Gadelha, Erik Trovão Diniz, Marcos Almeida, Lucia Helena Cordeiro, Erico Higino de Carvalho, Ana Teresa Bezerra de Melo, Karoline Matias Medeiros, Gabriel Rodrigues de Assis Ferreira, José Coelho Mororó, Daniela Zago Ximenes, Camila Ribeiro Coutinho Madruga, Rosália de Oliveira Nunes, Yanna Queiroz Pereira de Sá, Luciana Ansaneli Naves\",\"doi\":\"10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determining the etiology of hyperprolactinemia is fundamental for selecting the most appropriate treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness and accuracy of prolactin levels in predicting the etiology of nonphysiological hyperprolactinemia.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we reviewed medical records of patients with nonphysiological hyperprolactinemia seen at two neuroendocrine reference centers located in Recife, Brazil, from January 2000 to December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 770 patients aged 12-73 years (65% female). The three most frequent etiologies of hyperprolactinemia were prolactinomas (n = 263; 34.2%), drug-induced hyperprolactinemia (n = 160; 20.8%), and macroprolactinemia (n = 120; 15.6%). The highest mean prolactin levels were observed in cases of prolactinomas and idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Most patients with hyperprolactinemia due to other etiologies had prolactin levels < 100 ng/mL, but these levels were also found in 16.5% of patients with microproplactinomas and in 20% of those with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Likewise, prolactin levels largely overlapped among patients with microprolactinomas, macroprolactinemia, and drug-induced hyperprolactinemia. Notably, prolactin levels > 250 ng/mL enabled a clear distinction between the etiologies of macroprolactinoma and nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. Moreover, prolactin levels > 500 ng/mL were highly suggestive of macroprolactinomas, although they were also found in very few patients (<2%) with microprolactinomas or drug-induced hyperprolactinemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite considerable overlap in prolactin levels among the different etiologies of hyperprolactinemia, values > 250 ng/mL allowed a clear distinction between macroprolactinomas and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Furthermore, prolactin levels > 500 ng/mL were almost exclusively found in patients with prolactinomas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"e230391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460971/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0391\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Endocrinology Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Usefulness of prolactin levels in predicting the etiology of hyperprolactinemia in a cohort of 770 patients.
Objective: Determining the etiology of hyperprolactinemia is fundamental for selecting the most appropriate treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness and accuracy of prolactin levels in predicting the etiology of nonphysiological hyperprolactinemia.
Subjects and methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed medical records of patients with nonphysiological hyperprolactinemia seen at two neuroendocrine reference centers located in Recife, Brazil, from January 2000 to December 2019.
Results: The study included 770 patients aged 12-73 years (65% female). The three most frequent etiologies of hyperprolactinemia were prolactinomas (n = 263; 34.2%), drug-induced hyperprolactinemia (n = 160; 20.8%), and macroprolactinemia (n = 120; 15.6%). The highest mean prolactin levels were observed in cases of prolactinomas and idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Most patients with hyperprolactinemia due to other etiologies had prolactin levels < 100 ng/mL, but these levels were also found in 16.5% of patients with microproplactinomas and in 20% of those with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Likewise, prolactin levels largely overlapped among patients with microprolactinomas, macroprolactinemia, and drug-induced hyperprolactinemia. Notably, prolactin levels > 250 ng/mL enabled a clear distinction between the etiologies of macroprolactinoma and nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. Moreover, prolactin levels > 500 ng/mL were highly suggestive of macroprolactinomas, although they were also found in very few patients (<2%) with microprolactinomas or drug-induced hyperprolactinemia.
Conclusion: Despite considerable overlap in prolactin levels among the different etiologies of hyperprolactinemia, values > 250 ng/mL allowed a clear distinction between macroprolactinomas and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Furthermore, prolactin levels > 500 ng/mL were almost exclusively found in patients with prolactinomas.
期刊介绍:
The Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism - AE&M – is the official journal of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism - SBEM, which is affiliated with the Brazilian Medical Association.
Edited since 1951, the AE&M aims at publishing articles on scientific themes in the basic translational and clinical area of Endocrinology and Metabolism. The printed version AE&M is published in 6 issues/year. The full electronic issue is open access in the SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online e at the AE&M site: www.aem-sbem.com.
From volume 59 on, the name was changed to Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, and it became mandatory for manuscripts to be submitted in English for the online issue. However, for the printed issue it is still optional for the articles to be sent in English or Portuguese.
The journal is published six times a year, with one issue every two months.