Alexandra P Walchhuetter, Richard C Dowell, Gary Rance, Jaime Leigh
{"title":"早期人工耳蜗植入:探索电生理阈值及其在行为前建议中的作用。","authors":"Alexandra P Walchhuetter, Richard C Dowell, Gary Rance, Jaime Leigh","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2416338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Studies investigating the relationship between initial electrophysiological thresholds and subsequent behavioural hearing thresholds have demonstrated uncertainty as to whether initial results can provide an accurate estimation of an infant's functional hearing. This estimation must be accurate if a cochlear implant (CI) is to be considered before behavioural audiometry.This study aims to explore the variance between initial electrophysiological thresholds and subsequent behavioural hearing thresholds in infants to determine under which conditions electrophysiological results can be used to support a CI recommendation before behavioural audiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective cohort study of 63 infants with suspected severe to profound hearing loss, referred to the Cochlear Implant Clinic, Melbourne, before 12 months of age. The assessment protocol includes auditory brainstem response, auditory steady state response, tympanometry, and behavioural audiometry.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For most infants undergoing CI candidacy evaluation, initial electrophysiological thresholds are an accurate reflection of their subsequent behavioural thresholds. An alternative CI candidacy pathway is recommended for infants who show profound sensorineural hearing loss on initial electrophysiological testing, in the absence of middle ear effusion, prematurity, or auditory neuropathy features, to provide CI recommendations before behavioural thresholds are obtained. This would lead to reduced delay to implantation and improved oral language outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"275-284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early cochlear implantation: exploring electrophysiological thresholds and their role in pre-behavioural recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra P Walchhuetter, Richard C Dowell, Gary Rance, Jaime Leigh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14670100.2024.2416338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Studies investigating the relationship between initial electrophysiological thresholds and subsequent behavioural hearing thresholds have demonstrated uncertainty as to whether initial results can provide an accurate estimation of an infant's functional hearing. This estimation must be accurate if a cochlear implant (CI) is to be considered before behavioural audiometry.This study aims to explore the variance between initial electrophysiological thresholds and subsequent behavioural hearing thresholds in infants to determine under which conditions electrophysiological results can be used to support a CI recommendation before behavioural audiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective cohort study of 63 infants with suspected severe to profound hearing loss, referred to the Cochlear Implant Clinic, Melbourne, before 12 months of age. The assessment protocol includes auditory brainstem response, auditory steady state response, tympanometry, and behavioural audiometry.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For most infants undergoing CI candidacy evaluation, initial electrophysiological thresholds are an accurate reflection of their subsequent behavioural thresholds. An alternative CI candidacy pathway is recommended for infants who show profound sensorineural hearing loss on initial electrophysiological testing, in the absence of middle ear effusion, prematurity, or auditory neuropathy features, to provide CI recommendations before behavioural thresholds are obtained. This would lead to reduced delay to implantation and improved oral language outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"275-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2024.2416338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2024.2416338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:对初始电生理阈值与后续行为听力阈值之间关系的研究表明,初始结果是否能准确估计婴儿的功能听力还存在不确定性。本研究旨在探讨婴儿的初始电生理阈值与随后的行为听力阈值之间的差异,以确定在何种条件下,电生理结果可用于支持在行为听力检查前推荐植入人工耳蜗(CI):这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是 63 名 12 个月前被转诊到墨尔本人工耳蜗诊所的疑似重度至极重度听力损失婴儿。评估方案包括听觉脑干反应、听觉稳态反应、鼓室测听和行为测听:结论:对于大多数接受 CI 候选评估的婴儿来说,最初的电生理阈值能准确反映其随后的行为阈值。对于在初始电生理测试中表现为深度感音神经性听力损失的婴儿,在没有中耳积液、早产或听神经病变特征的情况下,建议采用另一种 CI 候选途径,在获得行为阈值之前提供 CI 建议。这将缩短植入时间,改善口语效果。
Early cochlear implantation: exploring electrophysiological thresholds and their role in pre-behavioural recommendations.
Background and aims: Studies investigating the relationship between initial electrophysiological thresholds and subsequent behavioural hearing thresholds have demonstrated uncertainty as to whether initial results can provide an accurate estimation of an infant's functional hearing. This estimation must be accurate if a cochlear implant (CI) is to be considered before behavioural audiometry.This study aims to explore the variance between initial electrophysiological thresholds and subsequent behavioural hearing thresholds in infants to determine under which conditions electrophysiological results can be used to support a CI recommendation before behavioural audiology.
Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of 63 infants with suspected severe to profound hearing loss, referred to the Cochlear Implant Clinic, Melbourne, before 12 months of age. The assessment protocol includes auditory brainstem response, auditory steady state response, tympanometry, and behavioural audiometry.
Conclusion: For most infants undergoing CI candidacy evaluation, initial electrophysiological thresholds are an accurate reflection of their subsequent behavioural thresholds. An alternative CI candidacy pathway is recommended for infants who show profound sensorineural hearing loss on initial electrophysiological testing, in the absence of middle ear effusion, prematurity, or auditory neuropathy features, to provide CI recommendations before behavioural thresholds are obtained. This would lead to reduced delay to implantation and improved oral language outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.