与工作有关的哮喘筛查问卷(长版)(WRASQ-L)TM 的评估和应用。

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Madison A MacKinnon, Taylar Wall, Alison Morra, Teresa To, Catherine Lemiere, M Diane Lougheed
{"title":"与工作有关的哮喘筛查问卷(长版)(WRASQ-L)TM 的评估和应用。","authors":"Madison A MacKinnon, Taylar Wall, Alison Morra, Teresa To, Catherine Lemiere, M Diane Lougheed","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Work-related Asthma (WRA) Screening Questionnaire (Long-Version)(WRASQ-L)<sup>TM</sup> is a screening questionnaire that could improve recognition of WRA.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a definitive evaluation of the WRASQ-L<sup>TM</sup> to justify its implementation in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employed adults aged 18-75 years with asthma confirmed by objective measures and the ability to take time off work were eligible. Participants completed the WRASQ-L<sup>TM</sup> then monitored their peak expiratory flow at and away from work or completed a specific inhalation challenge test. Data were classified as WRA or non-WRA by two asthma specialists, blinded to WRASQ-L<sup>TM</sup> answers. Sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) and Youden's index were calculated for cut-offs of a positive screen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 106 participants (47.1±7.1 years (mean ± SD); 60 (57%) female), 14 (17%) were classified as WRA and were significantly younger in age than non-WRA participants (p=0.043). The questionnaire has high SN and NPV (90.9% and 93.1%, respectively), but low PPV and SP (32.1% and 26.0%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WRASQ-L<sup>TM</sup> has high SN and NPV. High SN is of primary interest to ensure that few false negative screens are missed and those with potential WRA are identified and continue to specialist care. The SN indicates utility of the questionnaire in clinical settings. Further benefits of the tool include its potential to prompt for education on the symptom-workplace relationship, workplace exposures, personal protective equipment use, and collect exposure and occupational history.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and Application of the Work-related Asthma Screening Questionnaire (Long-version) (WRASQ-L)<sup>TM</sup>.\",\"authors\":\"Madison A MacKinnon, Taylar Wall, Alison Morra, Teresa To, Catherine Lemiere, M Diane Lougheed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.10.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Work-related Asthma (WRA) Screening Questionnaire (Long-Version)(WRASQ-L)<sup>TM</sup> is a screening questionnaire that could improve recognition of WRA.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a definitive evaluation of the WRASQ-L<sup>TM</sup> to justify its implementation in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employed adults aged 18-75 years with asthma confirmed by objective measures and the ability to take time off work were eligible. Participants completed the WRASQ-L<sup>TM</sup> then monitored their peak expiratory flow at and away from work or completed a specific inhalation challenge test. Data were classified as WRA or non-WRA by two asthma specialists, blinded to WRASQ-L<sup>TM</sup> answers. Sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) and Youden's index were calculated for cut-offs of a positive screen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 106 participants (47.1±7.1 years (mean ± SD); 60 (57%) female), 14 (17%) were classified as WRA and were significantly younger in age than non-WRA participants (p=0.043). The questionnaire has high SN and NPV (90.9% and 93.1%, respectively), but low PPV and SP (32.1% and 26.0%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WRASQ-L<sup>TM</sup> has high SN and NPV. High SN is of primary interest to ensure that few false negative screens are missed and those with potential WRA are identified and continue to specialist care. The SN indicates utility of the questionnaire in clinical settings. Further benefits of the tool include its potential to prompt for education on the symptom-workplace relationship, workplace exposures, personal protective equipment use, and collect exposure and occupational history.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.10.012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.10.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:工作相关哮喘(WRA)筛查问卷(长版)(WRASQ-L)TM是一种筛查问卷,可提高对WRA的识别率:目的:对 WRASQ-LTM 进行最终评估,以证明其在临床环境中的应用合理性:方法:年龄在 18-75 岁之间、通过客观测量确认患有哮喘且能够请假的就业成人均符合条件。参与者填写 WRASQ-LTM,然后监测上班和下班时的呼气流量峰值,或完成特定的吸入挑战测试。数据由两名哮喘专家分类为WRA或非WRA,他们对WRASQ-LTM的答案视而不见。计算了阳性筛查的敏感性(SN)、特异性(SP)、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)以及尤登指数:在 106 名参与者(47.1±7.1 岁(平均值±标度);60 名(57%)女性)中,14 名(17%)被归类为 WRA,其年龄明显小于非 WRA 参与者(P=0.043)。问卷的SN和NPV较高(分别为90.9%和93.1%),但PPV和SP较低(分别为32.1%和26.0%):结论:WRASQ-LTM 具有较高的 SN 和 NPV。结论:WRASQ-LTM 具有较高的信噪比(SN)和净信噪比(NPV)。SN表明了问卷在临床环境中的实用性。该工具的其他益处还包括:它有可能促进有关症状与工作场所的关系、工作场所接触、个人防护设备使用的教育,并收集接触史和职业史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation and Application of the Work-related Asthma Screening Questionnaire (Long-version) (WRASQ-L)TM.

Background: The Work-related Asthma (WRA) Screening Questionnaire (Long-Version)(WRASQ-L)TM is a screening questionnaire that could improve recognition of WRA.

Objective: To conduct a definitive evaluation of the WRASQ-LTM to justify its implementation in clinical settings.

Methods: Employed adults aged 18-75 years with asthma confirmed by objective measures and the ability to take time off work were eligible. Participants completed the WRASQ-LTM then monitored their peak expiratory flow at and away from work or completed a specific inhalation challenge test. Data were classified as WRA or non-WRA by two asthma specialists, blinded to WRASQ-LTM answers. Sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) and Youden's index were calculated for cut-offs of a positive screen.

Results: Of 106 participants (47.1±7.1 years (mean ± SD); 60 (57%) female), 14 (17%) were classified as WRA and were significantly younger in age than non-WRA participants (p=0.043). The questionnaire has high SN and NPV (90.9% and 93.1%, respectively), but low PPV and SP (32.1% and 26.0%, respectively).

Conclusions: The WRASQ-LTM has high SN and NPV. High SN is of primary interest to ensure that few false negative screens are missed and those with potential WRA are identified and continue to specialist care. The SN indicates utility of the questionnaire in clinical settings. Further benefits of the tool include its potential to prompt for education on the symptom-workplace relationship, workplace exposures, personal protective equipment use, and collect exposure and occupational history.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
9.60%
发文量
683
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases. This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders. The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信