与机械通气的 COVID-19 患者俯卧位相关的并发症:一项多中心回顾性观察研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Thomas C Rollinson, Luke A McDonald, Joleen Rose, Glenn Eastwood, Rahul Costa-Pinto, Lucy Modra, Maeda Akinori, Zoe Bacolas, James Anstey, Samantha Bates, Scott Bradley, Jodi Dumbrell, Craig French, Angaj Ghosh, Kimberley Haines, Tim Haydon, Carol L Hodgson, Jennifer Holmes, Nina Leggett, Forbes McGain, Cara Moore, Kathleen Nelson, Jeffrey Presneill, Hannah Rotherham, Simone Said, Meredith Young, Peinan Zhao, Andrew Udy, Ary Serpa Neto, Anis Chaba, Rinaldo Bellomo
{"title":"与机械通气的 COVID-19 患者俯卧位相关的并发症:一项多中心回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Thomas C Rollinson, Luke A McDonald, Joleen Rose, Glenn Eastwood, Rahul Costa-Pinto, Lucy Modra, Maeda Akinori, Zoe Bacolas, James Anstey, Samantha Bates, Scott Bradley, Jodi Dumbrell, Craig French, Angaj Ghosh, Kimberley Haines, Tim Haydon, Carol L Hodgson, Jennifer Holmes, Nina Leggett, Forbes McGain, Cara Moore, Kathleen Nelson, Jeffrey Presneill, Hannah Rotherham, Simone Said, Meredith Young, Peinan Zhao, Andrew Udy, Ary Serpa Neto, Anis Chaba, Rinaldo Bellomo","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Prone positioning is commonly applied to improve gas exchange in mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Whilst prone positioning is effective, specific complications may arise. We aimed to assess the prevalence of specific complications related to prone positioning in patients mechanically ventilated for COVID-19-related ARDS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicentre, retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-centre observational study of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-related ARDS admitted to intensive care units in Melbourne, Australia, from August to November 2021. Data on baseline characteristics, prone positioning, complications, and patient outcomes were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed 553 prone episodes in 220 patients across seven sites (mean ± standard deviation age: 54 ± 13 years, 61% male). Overall, 58% (127/220) of patients experienced at least one prone-positioning-related complication. Pressure injury was the most prevalent (n = 92/220, 42%) complication reported. Factors associated with increased risk of pressure injury were male sex (adjusted odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: [1.02-1.31]) and the total number of prone episodes (adjusted odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval: [1.07-1.15]). Device dislodgement was the next most common complication, occurring in 28 of 220 (13%) patients. There were no nerve or retinal injuries reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pressure injuries and line dislodgement were the most prevalent complications associated with prone positioning of patients mechanically ventilated for COVID-19. The risk of pressure injuries was associated with male sex and the number of prone positioning episodes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"101117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complications associated with prone positioning in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients: A multicentre, retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas C Rollinson, Luke A McDonald, Joleen Rose, Glenn Eastwood, Rahul Costa-Pinto, Lucy Modra, Maeda Akinori, Zoe Bacolas, James Anstey, Samantha Bates, Scott Bradley, Jodi Dumbrell, Craig French, Angaj Ghosh, Kimberley Haines, Tim Haydon, Carol L Hodgson, Jennifer Holmes, Nina Leggett, Forbes McGain, Cara Moore, Kathleen Nelson, Jeffrey Presneill, Hannah Rotherham, Simone Said, Meredith Young, Peinan Zhao, Andrew Udy, Ary Serpa Neto, Anis Chaba, Rinaldo Bellomo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Prone positioning is commonly applied to improve gas exchange in mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Whilst prone positioning is effective, specific complications may arise. We aimed to assess the prevalence of specific complications related to prone positioning in patients mechanically ventilated for COVID-19-related ARDS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicentre, retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-centre observational study of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-related ARDS admitted to intensive care units in Melbourne, Australia, from August to November 2021. Data on baseline characteristics, prone positioning, complications, and patient outcomes were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed 553 prone episodes in 220 patients across seven sites (mean ± standard deviation age: 54 ± 13 years, 61% male). Overall, 58% (127/220) of patients experienced at least one prone-positioning-related complication. Pressure injury was the most prevalent (n = 92/220, 42%) complication reported. Factors associated with increased risk of pressure injury were male sex (adjusted odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: [1.02-1.31]) and the total number of prone episodes (adjusted odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval: [1.07-1.15]). Device dislodgement was the next most common complication, occurring in 28 of 220 (13%) patients. There were no nerve or retinal injuries reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pressure injuries and line dislodgement were the most prevalent complications associated with prone positioning of patients mechanically ventilated for COVID-19. The risk of pressure injuries was associated with male sex and the number of prone positioning episodes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:俯卧位通常用于改善 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)机械通气患者的气体交换。俯卧位虽然有效,但也可能出现特殊并发症。我们旨在评估因 COVID-19 相关 ARDS 而接受机械通气的患者中与俯卧位相关的特殊并发症的发生率:多中心、回顾性观察研究:对2021年8月至11月期间澳大利亚墨尔本重症监护病房收治的COVID-19相关ARDS机械通气患者进行多中心观察研究。研究收集了有关基线特征、俯卧位、并发症和患者预后的数据:我们评估了7个地点220名患者的553次俯卧位(平均±标准差年龄:54±13岁,61%为男性)。总体而言,58%(127/220)的患者至少经历过一次俯卧位相关并发症。压伤是最常见的并发症(n = 92/220,42%)。与压力损伤风险增加相关的因素是男性(调整后的几率比=1.15,95% 置信区间:[1.02-1.31])和俯卧位次数(调整后的几率比=1.11,95% 置信区间:[1.07-1.15])。装置脱落是其次最常见的并发症,220 例患者中有 28 例(13%)发生了装置脱落。没有神经或视网膜损伤的报告:结论:压伤和管路脱落是因 COVID-19 而接受机械通气的患者俯卧位时最常见的并发症。压力损伤的风险与男性和俯卧位的次数有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complications associated with prone positioning in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients: A multicentre, retrospective observational study.

Background and aims: Prone positioning is commonly applied to improve gas exchange in mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Whilst prone positioning is effective, specific complications may arise. We aimed to assess the prevalence of specific complications related to prone positioning in patients mechanically ventilated for COVID-19-related ARDS.

Design: Multicentre, retrospective observational study.

Methods: Multi-centre observational study of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-related ARDS admitted to intensive care units in Melbourne, Australia, from August to November 2021. Data on baseline characteristics, prone positioning, complications, and patient outcomes were collected.

Results: We assessed 553 prone episodes in 220 patients across seven sites (mean ± standard deviation age: 54 ± 13 years, 61% male). Overall, 58% (127/220) of patients experienced at least one prone-positioning-related complication. Pressure injury was the most prevalent (n = 92/220, 42%) complication reported. Factors associated with increased risk of pressure injury were male sex (adjusted odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: [1.02-1.31]) and the total number of prone episodes (adjusted odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval: [1.07-1.15]). Device dislodgement was the next most common complication, occurring in 28 of 220 (13%) patients. There were no nerve or retinal injuries reported.

Conclusions: Pressure injuries and line dislodgement were the most prevalent complications associated with prone positioning of patients mechanically ventilated for COVID-19. The risk of pressure injuries was associated with male sex and the number of prone positioning episodes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信