透过表面看本质:治疗 mIDH1 急性髓性白血病的 Olutasidenib 和 Ivosidenib。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1007/s11864-024-01264-7
Justin M Watts, Simon J Shaw, Brian A Jonas
{"title":"透过表面看本质:治疗 mIDH1 急性髓性白血病的 Olutasidenib 和 Ivosidenib。","authors":"Justin M Watts, Simon J Shaw, Brian A Jonas","doi":"10.1007/s11864-024-01264-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) are recurrent in several malignancies and prevalent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Olutasidenib and ivosidenib are inhibitors that target mutant IDH1 (mIDH1) and are FDA approved for the treatment of patients with mIDH1 AML. Olutasidenib and ivosidenib were identified through unique molecular screens and thus are structurally very different molecules. A difference in clinical outcomes has been observed with olutasidenib, which has a longer duration of response than ivosidenib, despite similar rates of response being achieved with the two drugs, such as complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CR/CRh). In the absence of a head-to-head trial, this review examines both the extent of differences in clinical outcomes with the two drugs and provides the first comparison of the unique molecular and mechanistic features of each drug, such as molecular structure and binding kinetics, that may contribute to the observed clinical difference in outcomes. Olutasidenib is structurally smaller with a lower molecular weight than ivosidenib (FW 355 vs FW 583) and thus occupies less space in the binding pocket of IDH1 dimers, making it resistant to displacement by IDH1 second-site mutations. In biochemical studies, olutasidenib selectively inhibits mutant but not wild-type IDH1, whereas ivosidenib appears to potently block both mutant and wild-type IDH1. Although they have the same target, olutasidenib and ivosidenib have unique molecular features, which may translate to selectivity differences in their inhibitory activity against IDH1.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1345-1353"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Looking Beyond the Surface: Olutasidenib and Ivosidenib for Treatment of mIDH1 Acute Myeloid Leukemia.\",\"authors\":\"Justin M Watts, Simon J Shaw, Brian A Jonas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11864-024-01264-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) are recurrent in several malignancies and prevalent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Olutasidenib and ivosidenib are inhibitors that target mutant IDH1 (mIDH1) and are FDA approved for the treatment of patients with mIDH1 AML. Olutasidenib and ivosidenib were identified through unique molecular screens and thus are structurally very different molecules. A difference in clinical outcomes has been observed with olutasidenib, which has a longer duration of response than ivosidenib, despite similar rates of response being achieved with the two drugs, such as complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CR/CRh). In the absence of a head-to-head trial, this review examines both the extent of differences in clinical outcomes with the two drugs and provides the first comparison of the unique molecular and mechanistic features of each drug, such as molecular structure and binding kinetics, that may contribute to the observed clinical difference in outcomes. Olutasidenib is structurally smaller with a lower molecular weight than ivosidenib (FW 355 vs FW 583) and thus occupies less space in the binding pocket of IDH1 dimers, making it resistant to displacement by IDH1 second-site mutations. In biochemical studies, olutasidenib selectively inhibits mutant but not wild-type IDH1, whereas ivosidenib appears to potently block both mutant and wild-type IDH1. Although they have the same target, olutasidenib and ivosidenib have unique molecular features, which may translate to selectivity differences in their inhibitory activity against IDH1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Treatment Options in Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1345-1353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541360/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Treatment Options in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-024-01264-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-024-01264-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意见陈述:异柠檬酸脱氢酶-1(IDH1)突变在多种恶性肿瘤中反复出现,在急性髓性白血病(AML)中很常见。Olutasidenib和ivosidenib是针对突变型IDH1(mIDH1)的抑制剂,已获FDA批准用于治疗mIDH1 AML患者。Olutasidenib 和 ivosidenib 是通过独特的分子筛选确定的,因此在结构上是截然不同的分子。尽管两种药物的应答率相似,如完全缓解(CR)或CR伴部分血液学恢复(CR/CRh),但观察到奥卢他尼的临床疗效不同,其应答持续时间长于伊沃西地尼。由于缺乏头对头试验,本综述既探讨了两种药物临床疗效的差异程度,也首次比较了每种药物独特的分子和机理特征,如分子结构和结合动力学,这些特征可能是造成临床疗效差异的原因。奥卢他尼在结构上比伊沃西地尼更小,分子量更低(FW 355 vs FW 583),因此在IDH1二聚体的结合口袋中占据的空间更少,使其能够抵抗IDH1第二位突变的置换。在生化研究中,olutasidenib 能选择性地抑制突变型而非野生型 IDH1,而 ivosidenib 似乎能有效地阻断突变型和野生型 IDH1。虽然它们的靶点相同,但奥路替尼和伊沃西替尼具有独特的分子特征,这可能会导致它们对IDH1的抑制活性存在选择性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Looking Beyond the Surface: Olutasidenib and Ivosidenib for Treatment of mIDH1 Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Opinion statement: Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) are recurrent in several malignancies and prevalent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Olutasidenib and ivosidenib are inhibitors that target mutant IDH1 (mIDH1) and are FDA approved for the treatment of patients with mIDH1 AML. Olutasidenib and ivosidenib were identified through unique molecular screens and thus are structurally very different molecules. A difference in clinical outcomes has been observed with olutasidenib, which has a longer duration of response than ivosidenib, despite similar rates of response being achieved with the two drugs, such as complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CR/CRh). In the absence of a head-to-head trial, this review examines both the extent of differences in clinical outcomes with the two drugs and provides the first comparison of the unique molecular and mechanistic features of each drug, such as molecular structure and binding kinetics, that may contribute to the observed clinical difference in outcomes. Olutasidenib is structurally smaller with a lower molecular weight than ivosidenib (FW 355 vs FW 583) and thus occupies less space in the binding pocket of IDH1 dimers, making it resistant to displacement by IDH1 second-site mutations. In biochemical studies, olutasidenib selectively inhibits mutant but not wild-type IDH1, whereas ivosidenib appears to potently block both mutant and wild-type IDH1. Although they have the same target, olutasidenib and ivosidenib have unique molecular features, which may translate to selectivity differences in their inhibitory activity against IDH1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published treatment option advances in the field of oncology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to facilitate worldwide approaches to cancer treatment. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as endocrine tumors, lymphomas, neuro-oncology, and cancers of the breast, head and neck, lung, skin, gastrointestinal tract, and genitourinary region. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known oncologists, and an international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信