多囊卵巢综合征的诊断不足模式(通过个人层面和空间社会脆弱性测量)。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Emily L Silva, Kevin J Lane, Jay Jojo Cheng, Zachary Popp, Breanna D van Loenen, Brent Coull, Jaime E Hart, Tamarra James-Todd, Shruthi Mahalingaiah
{"title":"多囊卵巢综合征的诊断不足模式(通过个人层面和空间社会脆弱性测量)。","authors":"Emily L Silva, Kevin J Lane, Jay Jojo Cheng, Zachary Popp, Breanna D van Loenen, Brent Coull, Jaime E Hart, Tamarra James-Todd, Shruthi Mahalingaiah","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use electronic health records (EHR) data at Boston Medical Center (BMC) to identify individual-level and spatial predictors of missed diagnosis, among those who meet diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The BMC Clinical Data Warehouse was used to source patients who presented between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2015, for any of the following: androgen blood tests, hirsutism, evaluation of menstrual regularity, pelvic ultrasound for any reason, or PCOS. Algorithm PCOS cases were identified as those with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for irregular menstruation and either an ICD code for hirsutism, elevated testosterone lab, or polycystic ovarian morphology as identified using natural language processing on pelvic ultrasounds. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of missed PCOS diagnosis by age, race/ethnicity, education, primary language, body mass index, insurance type, and social vulnerability index (SVI) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 2003-2015 BMC-EHR PCOS at-risk cohort (n = 23 786), there were 1199 physician-diagnosed PCOS cases and 730 algorithm PCOS cases. In logistic regression models controlling for age, year, education, and SVI scores, Black/African American patients were more likely to have missed a PCOS diagnosis (OR = 1.69 [95% CI, 1.28, 2.24]) compared to non-Hispanic White patients, and relying on Medicaid or charity for insurance was associated with an increased odds of missed diagnosis when compared to private insurance (OR = 1.90 [95% CI, 1.47, 2.46], OR = 1.90 [95% CI, 1.41, 2.56], respectively). Higher SVI scores were associated with increased odds of missed diagnosis in univariate models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed individual-level and spatial disparities within the PCOS diagnosis. Further research should explore drivers of disparities for earlier intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"1657-1666"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Underdiagnosis Patterns by Individual-level and Spatial Social Vulnerability Measures.\",\"authors\":\"Emily L Silva, Kevin J Lane, Jay Jojo Cheng, Zachary Popp, Breanna D van Loenen, Brent Coull, Jaime E Hart, Tamarra James-Todd, Shruthi Mahalingaiah\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/clinem/dgae705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use electronic health records (EHR) data at Boston Medical Center (BMC) to identify individual-level and spatial predictors of missed diagnosis, among those who meet diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The BMC Clinical Data Warehouse was used to source patients who presented between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2015, for any of the following: androgen blood tests, hirsutism, evaluation of menstrual regularity, pelvic ultrasound for any reason, or PCOS. Algorithm PCOS cases were identified as those with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for irregular menstruation and either an ICD code for hirsutism, elevated testosterone lab, or polycystic ovarian morphology as identified using natural language processing on pelvic ultrasounds. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of missed PCOS diagnosis by age, race/ethnicity, education, primary language, body mass index, insurance type, and social vulnerability index (SVI) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 2003-2015 BMC-EHR PCOS at-risk cohort (n = 23 786), there were 1199 physician-diagnosed PCOS cases and 730 algorithm PCOS cases. In logistic regression models controlling for age, year, education, and SVI scores, Black/African American patients were more likely to have missed a PCOS diagnosis (OR = 1.69 [95% CI, 1.28, 2.24]) compared to non-Hispanic White patients, and relying on Medicaid or charity for insurance was associated with an increased odds of missed diagnosis when compared to private insurance (OR = 1.90 [95% CI, 1.47, 2.46], OR = 1.90 [95% CI, 1.41, 2.56], respectively). Higher SVI scores were associated with increased odds of missed diagnosis in univariate models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed individual-level and spatial disparities within the PCOS diagnosis. Further research should explore drivers of disparities for earlier intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1657-1666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086426/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae705\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae705","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要利用波士顿医疗中心(BMC)的电子健康记录(EHR)数据,在符合多囊卵巢综合征诊断标准的患者中识别个人层面和空间层面的漏诊预测因素:方法:波士顿医疗中心临床数据仓库(BMC Clinical Data Warehouse)用于收集 2003 年 10 月 1 日至 2015 年 9 月 30 日期间因以下原因就诊的患者:雄激素血液检测、多毛症、月经规律性评估、任何原因的盆腔超声检查或多囊卵巢综合症。多囊卵巢综合症病例被确定为具有国际疾病分类(ICD)代码的月经不调病例,以及通过盆腔超声自然语言处理确定的多毛症、睾酮实验室升高或多囊卵巢形态的 ICD 代码病例。使用逻辑回归模型估算了按年龄、种族/民族、教育程度、主要语言、体重指数(BMI)、保险类型和社会脆弱性指数(SVI)评分计算的多囊卵巢综合症漏诊几率比(ORs):在 2003-2015 年 BMC-EHR PCOS 高危队列(n=23,786)中,有 1,199 个医生诊断的 PCOS 病例和 730 个算法 PCOS 病例。在控制年龄、年份、教育程度和 SVI 评分的逻辑回归模型中,黑人/非洲裔美国人患者与非黑人/非洲裔美国人患者相比,更有可能错过 PCOS 诊断(OR = 1.69 [95% CI, 1.28, 2.与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,依靠医疗补助或慈善机构提供保险的患者漏诊的几率比私人保险患者高(OR = 1.90 [95% CI, 1.47, 2.46], OR = 1.90 [95% CI, 1.41, 2.56])。在单变量模型中,SVI得分越高,漏诊几率越大:我们观察到在多囊卵巢综合症诊断中存在个人层面和空间上的差异。进一步的研究应探讨造成差异的原因,以便更早地进行干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Underdiagnosis Patterns by Individual-level and Spatial Social Vulnerability Measures.

Objective: To use electronic health records (EHR) data at Boston Medical Center (BMC) to identify individual-level and spatial predictors of missed diagnosis, among those who meet diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

Methods: The BMC Clinical Data Warehouse was used to source patients who presented between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2015, for any of the following: androgen blood tests, hirsutism, evaluation of menstrual regularity, pelvic ultrasound for any reason, or PCOS. Algorithm PCOS cases were identified as those with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for irregular menstruation and either an ICD code for hirsutism, elevated testosterone lab, or polycystic ovarian morphology as identified using natural language processing on pelvic ultrasounds. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of missed PCOS diagnosis by age, race/ethnicity, education, primary language, body mass index, insurance type, and social vulnerability index (SVI) score.

Results: In the 2003-2015 BMC-EHR PCOS at-risk cohort (n = 23 786), there were 1199 physician-diagnosed PCOS cases and 730 algorithm PCOS cases. In logistic regression models controlling for age, year, education, and SVI scores, Black/African American patients were more likely to have missed a PCOS diagnosis (OR = 1.69 [95% CI, 1.28, 2.24]) compared to non-Hispanic White patients, and relying on Medicaid or charity for insurance was associated with an increased odds of missed diagnosis when compared to private insurance (OR = 1.90 [95% CI, 1.47, 2.46], OR = 1.90 [95% CI, 1.41, 2.56], respectively). Higher SVI scores were associated with increased odds of missed diagnosis in univariate models.

Conclusion: We observed individual-level and spatial disparities within the PCOS diagnosis. Further research should explore drivers of disparities for earlier intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信