弥散加权核磁共振成像与标准核磁共振成像在黏液囊肿和黏液瘤鉴别诊断中的比较。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1002/lary.31833
Vanessa Adewole, Fatma Boubaker, Gabriela Hossu, Duc T Nguyen, Alain Blum, Pedro A Gondim Teixeira, Cécile Rumeau, Romain Gillet
{"title":"弥散加权核磁共振成像与标准核磁共振成像在黏液囊肿和黏液瘤鉴别诊断中的比较。","authors":"Vanessa Adewole, Fatma Boubaker, Gabriela Hossu, Duc T Nguyen, Alain Blum, Pedro A Gondim Teixeira, Cécile Rumeau, Romain Gillet","doi":"10.1002/lary.31833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective(s): </strong>To determine the accuracy of conventional and diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI for the differential diagnosis between mucopyocele and mucocele using surgical diagnosis as a reference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients referred to our institution between March 2017 and February 2024 for paranasal sinus MRI to characterize an expansile non-enhanced sinus filling on CT. The T1 and T2 signal intensities were recorded, as well as the presence of restriction diffusion, of the penumbra sign, the double rim sign, and the presence of parietal micro-abscesses. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 74 patients aged 18 to 88 years (mean age: 60.4 ± 17.7 years). Of these, 43 had a mucopyocele and 31 had a mucocele. The T1 high signal intensity was different amongst groups as an hypersignal was present in 35.5% of mucoceles and only 4.7% of mucopyoceles (p = 0.02). The T2 signal did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.59). The double rim sign and the presence of parietal micro-abscesses demonstrated 96.8% and 100% specificities, respectively, but were predominantly located in the maxillary sinus. The penumbra sign exhibited a sensitivity of 60.5% and a specificity of 67.7%. All mucopyoceles exhibited a diffusion restriction with an apparent diffusion coefficient of less than 0.78 × 10-3 mm<sup>2</sup>/s.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DWI is the most useful MRI tool for the accurate differential diagnosis between mucopyocele and mucocele in non-enhanced sinus fillings.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III (case-control study) Laryngoscope, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diffusion-Weighted MRI Over Standard MRI for Differential Diagnosis between Mucopyocele and Mucoceles.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Adewole, Fatma Boubaker, Gabriela Hossu, Duc T Nguyen, Alain Blum, Pedro A Gondim Teixeira, Cécile Rumeau, Romain Gillet\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.31833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective(s): </strong>To determine the accuracy of conventional and diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI for the differential diagnosis between mucopyocele and mucocele using surgical diagnosis as a reference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients referred to our institution between March 2017 and February 2024 for paranasal sinus MRI to characterize an expansile non-enhanced sinus filling on CT. The T1 and T2 signal intensities were recorded, as well as the presence of restriction diffusion, of the penumbra sign, the double rim sign, and the presence of parietal micro-abscesses. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 74 patients aged 18 to 88 years (mean age: 60.4 ± 17.7 years). Of these, 43 had a mucopyocele and 31 had a mucocele. The T1 high signal intensity was different amongst groups as an hypersignal was present in 35.5% of mucoceles and only 4.7% of mucopyoceles (p = 0.02). The T2 signal did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.59). The double rim sign and the presence of parietal micro-abscesses demonstrated 96.8% and 100% specificities, respectively, but were predominantly located in the maxillary sinus. The penumbra sign exhibited a sensitivity of 60.5% and a specificity of 67.7%. All mucopyoceles exhibited a diffusion restriction with an apparent diffusion coefficient of less than 0.78 × 10-3 mm<sup>2</sup>/s.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DWI is the most useful MRI tool for the accurate differential diagnosis between mucopyocele and mucocele in non-enhanced sinus fillings.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III (case-control study) Laryngoscope, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的以手术诊断为参考,确定传统磁共振成像和弥散加权(DWI)磁共振成像对粘液鞘和粘液鞘鉴别诊断的准确性:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2017 年 3 月至 2024 年 2 月期间转诊至我院进行鼻旁窦 MRI 检查的患者,以确定 CT 上膨胀性非增强鼻窦充盈的特征。记录了 T1 和 T2 信号强度,以及是否存在限制性弥散、半影征、双缘征和顶叶微脓肿。此外,还记录了表观扩散系数的定量值:研究共纳入 74 名患者,年龄在 18 至 88 岁之间(平均年龄:60.4 ± 17.7 岁)。其中,43 人患有粘液脓肿,31 人患有粘液脓肿。各组的 T1 高信号强度不同,35.5% 的粘液瘤出现高信号,而只有 4.7% 的粘液瘤出现高信号(p = 0.02)。两组的 T2 信号没有差异(p = 0.59)。双缘征和顶窦微脓肿的特异性分别为 96.8%和 100%,但主要位于上颌窦。半影征的敏感性为 60.5%,特异性为 67.7%。所有粘液瘤都表现出扩散受限,表观扩散系数小于 0.78 × 10-3 mm2/s:结论:DWI 是准确鉴别诊断非增强鼻窦填塞粘液瘤和粘液囊最有用的 MRI 工具:III(病例对照研究)《喉镜》,2024 年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diffusion-Weighted MRI Over Standard MRI for Differential Diagnosis between Mucopyocele and Mucoceles.

Objective(s): To determine the accuracy of conventional and diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI for the differential diagnosis between mucopyocele and mucocele using surgical diagnosis as a reference.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients referred to our institution between March 2017 and February 2024 for paranasal sinus MRI to characterize an expansile non-enhanced sinus filling on CT. The T1 and T2 signal intensities were recorded, as well as the presence of restriction diffusion, of the penumbra sign, the double rim sign, and the presence of parietal micro-abscesses. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values were also recorded.

Results: The study included 74 patients aged 18 to 88 years (mean age: 60.4 ± 17.7 years). Of these, 43 had a mucopyocele and 31 had a mucocele. The T1 high signal intensity was different amongst groups as an hypersignal was present in 35.5% of mucoceles and only 4.7% of mucopyoceles (p = 0.02). The T2 signal did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.59). The double rim sign and the presence of parietal micro-abscesses demonstrated 96.8% and 100% specificities, respectively, but were predominantly located in the maxillary sinus. The penumbra sign exhibited a sensitivity of 60.5% and a specificity of 67.7%. All mucopyoceles exhibited a diffusion restriction with an apparent diffusion coefficient of less than 0.78 × 10-3 mm2/s.

Conclusion: DWI is the most useful MRI tool for the accurate differential diagnosis between mucopyocele and mucocele in non-enhanced sinus fillings.

Level of evidence: III (case-control study) Laryngoscope, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信