慢性阻塞性肺疾病吸入器治疗试验中基于种族的肺功能测试校正:系统回顾

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jean Z Wang, Ryan Chow, Sheojung Shin, Sarah Yang, Preshit Ambade, Sadia Jama, Razan Frances, Smita Pakhale
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺疾病吸入器治疗试验中基于种族的肺功能测试校正:系统回顾","authors":"Jean Z Wang, Ryan Chow, Sheojung Shin, Sarah Yang, Preshit Ambade, Sadia Jama, Razan Frances, Smita Pakhale","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S475875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Race-based correction is widely utilized in clinical practice, but may contribute to overestimation of lung function, underdiagnoses in minority groups, and exclusion of minority groups from research trials. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the usage of race-based correction in pulmonary function testing (PFT) within chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) research and its impact on the exclusion of minority groups from research trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched Medline from 2010 to 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examine inhaler therapy for COPD. Article screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction were completed in duplicate by independent reviewers. Data regarding study design, inclusion criteria, demographics, and race-based correction were extracted and synthesized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 774 screened articles, we included 21 RCTs in the review, which were multinational trials involving 70696 study participants. All studies had an inclusion criteria of an FEV<sub>1</sub> cutoff of 50% to 80%. Racial minorities remained underrepresented in the trials, with the proportion of black participants ranging from <1% to 4.7%. Four studies directly mentioned race-based correction, while the remainder of the studies did not provide any explicit details. After obtaining additional information by contacting authors and reviewing the citations, 15 were estimated to utilize race-based correction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Race-based correction may be frequently utilized in major COPD RCTs, but there remains inconsistent reporting regarding the usage of race-based correction. This may contribute to the exclusion of racialized populations from research trials as there remains significant underrepresentation of racialized populations from research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"19 ","pages":"2285-2297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Race-Based Pulmonary Function Testing Correction in COPD Inhaler Therapy Trials: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jean Z Wang, Ryan Chow, Sheojung Shin, Sarah Yang, Preshit Ambade, Sadia Jama, Razan Frances, Smita Pakhale\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/COPD.S475875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Race-based correction is widely utilized in clinical practice, but may contribute to overestimation of lung function, underdiagnoses in minority groups, and exclusion of minority groups from research trials. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the usage of race-based correction in pulmonary function testing (PFT) within chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) research and its impact on the exclusion of minority groups from research trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched Medline from 2010 to 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examine inhaler therapy for COPD. Article screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction were completed in duplicate by independent reviewers. Data regarding study design, inclusion criteria, demographics, and race-based correction were extracted and synthesized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 774 screened articles, we included 21 RCTs in the review, which were multinational trials involving 70696 study participants. All studies had an inclusion criteria of an FEV<sub>1</sub> cutoff of 50% to 80%. Racial minorities remained underrepresented in the trials, with the proportion of black participants ranging from <1% to 4.7%. Four studies directly mentioned race-based correction, while the remainder of the studies did not provide any explicit details. After obtaining additional information by contacting authors and reviewing the citations, 15 were estimated to utilize race-based correction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Race-based correction may be frequently utilized in major COPD RCTs, but there remains inconsistent reporting regarding the usage of race-based correction. This may contribute to the exclusion of racialized populations from research trials as there remains significant underrepresentation of racialized populations from research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"2285-2297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481996/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S475875\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S475875","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基于种族的校正在临床实践中被广泛使用,但可能会导致高估肺功能、少数群体诊断不足以及少数群体被排除在研究试验之外。本系统性综述旨在研究慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)研究中肺功能测试(PFT)中种族校正的使用情况及其对研究试验中排斥少数群体的影响:我们系统地检索了 2010 年至 2022 年的 Medline,以确定研究慢性阻塞性肺病吸入器疗法的随机对照试验 (RCT)。文章筛选、批判性评价和数据提取由独立审稿人一式两份完成。我们提取了有关研究设计、纳入标准、人口统计学和种族校正的数据,并进行了叙述性综合:在筛选出的 774 篇文章中,我们纳入了 21 项 RCT 研究,这些研究是跨国试验,涉及 70696 名研究参与者。所有研究的纳入标准均为 FEV1 临界值为 50% 至 80%。在这些试验中,少数种族的代表性仍然不足,黑人参与者的比例从结论中得出:在主要的慢性阻塞性肺病研究中,可能会经常使用基于种族的校正,但关于使用基于种族的校正的报告仍不一致。这可能会导致种族化人群被排除在研究试验之外,因为种族化人群在研究中的代表性仍然严重不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Race-Based Pulmonary Function Testing Correction in COPD Inhaler Therapy Trials: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: Race-based correction is widely utilized in clinical practice, but may contribute to overestimation of lung function, underdiagnoses in minority groups, and exclusion of minority groups from research trials. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the usage of race-based correction in pulmonary function testing (PFT) within chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) research and its impact on the exclusion of minority groups from research trials.

Methods: We systematically searched Medline from 2010 to 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examine inhaler therapy for COPD. Article screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction were completed in duplicate by independent reviewers. Data regarding study design, inclusion criteria, demographics, and race-based correction were extracted and synthesized narratively.

Results: Of the 774 screened articles, we included 21 RCTs in the review, which were multinational trials involving 70696 study participants. All studies had an inclusion criteria of an FEV1 cutoff of 50% to 80%. Racial minorities remained underrepresented in the trials, with the proportion of black participants ranging from <1% to 4.7%. Four studies directly mentioned race-based correction, while the remainder of the studies did not provide any explicit details. After obtaining additional information by contacting authors and reviewing the citations, 15 were estimated to utilize race-based correction.

Conclusion: Race-based correction may be frequently utilized in major COPD RCTs, but there remains inconsistent reporting regarding the usage of race-based correction. This may contribute to the exclusion of racialized populations from research trials as there remains significant underrepresentation of racialized populations from research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信