印度语版重症监护室意识混乱评估法(CAM-ICU)诊断谵妄的可靠性和有效性:一项队列研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Rashmi Salhotra, Abhirup Bose, Shruti Srivastava, Medha Mohta, Karthik Pandarinathan, Rajesh Singh Rautela
{"title":"印度语版重症监护室意识混乱评估法(CAM-ICU)诊断谵妄的可靠性和有效性:一项队列研究。","authors":"Rashmi Salhotra, Abhirup Bose, Shruti Srivastava, Medha Mohta, Karthik Pandarinathan, Rajesh Singh Rautela","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) is a bedside tool to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients. This study aims to determine the reliability and validity of the Hindi version of CAM-ICU against the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), fourth edition text revision (DSM-IV-TR), and DSM, fifth edition (DSM-5) criteria for diagnosis of delirium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-five Hindi-speaking consenting patients ≥18-year-old with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale ≥-3 and an anticipated ICU stay > 48 hours were included. Patients with known severe mental illnesses, visual/hearing loss, neurological injury, burns, drug overdose, and Glasgow Coma Scale <9 at the time of screening were excluded. After 48 hours of ICU stay and ensuring at least 2 hours of sedative interruption, within a 4-hour period, two examiners independently assessed delirium using the Hindi version of the scale and an experienced psychiatrist assessed the patients independently and applied the DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 criteria for diagnosing delirium. Time taken for CAM-ICU assessment, inter-observer reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cohen's κ value was 0.944 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The Cronbach's α for observer 1 and observer 2 was 0.961 and 0.968, respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of the tool was 100% with both DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5. The specificity was 90.2% and 92% and the positive predictive value was 82.8 and 86.2% with DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Hindi version of CAM-ICU is a reliable and valid tool for the diagnosis of delirium in an ICU setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry, India (CTRI) as per the research guidelines laid down by the Indian Council of Medical Research before enrolling the participants. (CTRI number- CTRI/2021/01/030471). The registration date was 14th January 2021. URL of registry is http://ctri.nic.in.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Delirium in the ICU is often undiagnosed due to unfamiliarity, lack of understanding of symptoms, non-availability of psychiatric consultation, and validated diagnostic tools in the native language of the patient. This study aims to find the reliability and validity of the Hindi version of CAM-ICU.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Salhotra R, Bose A, Srivastava S, Mohta M, Pandarinathan K, Rautela RS. Reliability and Validity of Hindi Version of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) for Diagnosis of Delirium: A Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(10):958-962.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"28 10","pages":"958-962"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and Validity of Hindi Version of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) for Diagnosis of Delirium: A Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Rashmi Salhotra, Abhirup Bose, Shruti Srivastava, Medha Mohta, Karthik Pandarinathan, Rajesh Singh Rautela\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) is a bedside tool to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients. This study aims to determine the reliability and validity of the Hindi version of CAM-ICU against the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), fourth edition text revision (DSM-IV-TR), and DSM, fifth edition (DSM-5) criteria for diagnosis of delirium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-five Hindi-speaking consenting patients ≥18-year-old with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale ≥-3 and an anticipated ICU stay > 48 hours were included. Patients with known severe mental illnesses, visual/hearing loss, neurological injury, burns, drug overdose, and Glasgow Coma Scale <9 at the time of screening were excluded. After 48 hours of ICU stay and ensuring at least 2 hours of sedative interruption, within a 4-hour period, two examiners independently assessed delirium using the Hindi version of the scale and an experienced psychiatrist assessed the patients independently and applied the DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 criteria for diagnosing delirium. Time taken for CAM-ICU assessment, inter-observer reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cohen's κ value was 0.944 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The Cronbach's α for observer 1 and observer 2 was 0.961 and 0.968, respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of the tool was 100% with both DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5. The specificity was 90.2% and 92% and the positive predictive value was 82.8 and 86.2% with DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Hindi version of CAM-ICU is a reliable and valid tool for the diagnosis of delirium in an ICU setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry, India (CTRI) as per the research guidelines laid down by the Indian Council of Medical Research before enrolling the participants. (CTRI number- CTRI/2021/01/030471). The registration date was 14th January 2021. URL of registry is http://ctri.nic.in.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Delirium in the ICU is often undiagnosed due to unfamiliarity, lack of understanding of symptoms, non-availability of psychiatric consultation, and validated diagnostic tools in the native language of the patient. This study aims to find the reliability and validity of the Hindi version of CAM-ICU.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Salhotra R, Bose A, Srivastava S, Mohta M, Pandarinathan K, Rautela RS. Reliability and Validity of Hindi Version of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) for Diagnosis of Delirium: A Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(10):958-962.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"28 10\",\"pages\":\"958-962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471980/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症监护室精神错乱评估法(CAM-ICU)是诊断重症患者精神错乱的床旁工具。本研究旨在对照《诊断与统计手册》(DSM)第四版文本修订版(DSM-IV-TR)和《诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)谵妄诊断标准,确定印地语版 CAM-ICU 的可靠性和有效性:方法:纳入 75 名年龄≥18 岁、里士满躁动镇静量表≥-3、预计在重症监护室住院时间大于 48 小时且同意接受治疗的印地语患者。已知有严重精神疾病、视力/听力丧失、神经损伤、烧伤、药物过量和格拉斯哥昏迷量表结果的患者:Cohen's κ 值为 0.944(p < 0.001)。观察者 1 和观察者 2 的 Cronbach's α 分别为 0.961 和 0.968。该工具对 DSM-IV-TR 和 DSM-5 的灵敏度和阴性预测值均为 100%。DSM-IV-TR和DSM-5的特异性分别为90.2%和92%,阳性预测值分别为82.8%和86.2%:结论:印地语版 CAM-ICU 是诊断重症监护病房谵妄的可靠有效工具:试验登记:根据印度医学研究委员会制定的研究指南,本研究在印度临床试验登记处(CTRI)进行了登记,然后再招募参与者。(CTRI编号- CTRI/2021/01/030471)。注册日期为 2021 年 1 月 14 日。注册网址为 http://ctri.nic.in.Highlights:重症监护室中的谵妄往往由于不熟悉情况、对症状缺乏了解、无法获得精神科咨询以及病人母语的有效诊断工具而得不到诊断。本研究旨在了解印地语版 CAM-ICU 的可靠性和有效性:Salhotra R, Bose A, Srivastava S, Mohta M, Pandarinathan K, Rautela RS.印度语版重症监护室意识混乱评估法(CAM-ICU)诊断谵妄的可靠性和有效性:队列研究》。Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(10):958-962.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and Validity of Hindi Version of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) for Diagnosis of Delirium: A Cohort Study.

Background: The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) is a bedside tool to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients. This study aims to determine the reliability and validity of the Hindi version of CAM-ICU against the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), fourth edition text revision (DSM-IV-TR), and DSM, fifth edition (DSM-5) criteria for diagnosis of delirium.

Methods: Seventy-five Hindi-speaking consenting patients ≥18-year-old with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale ≥-3 and an anticipated ICU stay > 48 hours were included. Patients with known severe mental illnesses, visual/hearing loss, neurological injury, burns, drug overdose, and Glasgow Coma Scale <9 at the time of screening were excluded. After 48 hours of ICU stay and ensuring at least 2 hours of sedative interruption, within a 4-hour period, two examiners independently assessed delirium using the Hindi version of the scale and an experienced psychiatrist assessed the patients independently and applied the DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 criteria for diagnosing delirium. Time taken for CAM-ICU assessment, inter-observer reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

Results: The Cohen's κ value was 0.944 (p < 0.001). The Cronbach's α for observer 1 and observer 2 was 0.961 and 0.968, respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of the tool was 100% with both DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5. The specificity was 90.2% and 92% and the positive predictive value was 82.8 and 86.2% with DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5, respectively.

Conclusions: The Hindi version of CAM-ICU is a reliable and valid tool for the diagnosis of delirium in an ICU setting.

Trial registration: The study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry, India (CTRI) as per the research guidelines laid down by the Indian Council of Medical Research before enrolling the participants. (CTRI number- CTRI/2021/01/030471). The registration date was 14th January 2021. URL of registry is http://ctri.nic.in.

Highlights: Delirium in the ICU is often undiagnosed due to unfamiliarity, lack of understanding of symptoms, non-availability of psychiatric consultation, and validated diagnostic tools in the native language of the patient. This study aims to find the reliability and validity of the Hindi version of CAM-ICU.

How to cite this article: Salhotra R, Bose A, Srivastava S, Mohta M, Pandarinathan K, Rautela RS. Reliability and Validity of Hindi Version of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) for Diagnosis of Delirium: A Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(10):958-962.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信