雾化甘草酸铵与沙丁胺醇和异丙托品复方制剂对重症机械通气的慢性阻塞性肺病患者通气参数的影响比较:一项观察性研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Preeti Priya, Soumya S Nath, Virendra Kumar, Suraj Kumar
{"title":"雾化甘草酸铵与沙丁胺醇和异丙托品复方制剂对重症机械通气的慢性阻塞性肺病患者通气参数的影响比较:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Preeti Priya, Soumya S Nath, Virendra Kumar, Suraj Kumar","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study examined the duration of bronchodilation induced by nebulized glycopyrronium bromide (GB) and compared its effectiveness and incidence of any side effects with the combination of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide (SI) in critically ill mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective, observational study was conducted in mechanically ventilated adult patients of COPD (18-75 years). Data of two groups of patients were collected for 12 hours each for three consecutive days after the nebulization - Group I: those who received 25 µg of GB, and Group II: those who received 1.25 mg of levo-salbutamol and 500 µg of ipratropium by nebulization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly higher number of patients in group II had copious secretions. The mean static compliance was comparable at all time intervals, whereas the mean airway pressure was significantly lower in group II from 15 minutes to 4 hours post-nebulization. In group I, the onset of bronchodilation was 30 minutes on days 1 and 3, and 60 minutes on day 2, whereas, in group II, it was 60 minutes on days 1 and 2 and 30 minutes on day 3. In group I, bronchodilation was 10 hours on day 1 and 12 hours each on days 2 and 3, whereas in group II, bronchodilation was 4 hours on day 1 and 6 hours each on day 2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with SI, GB nebulization resulted in lesser respiratory secretions, a longer duration of action in terms of lowered airway resistance, and no adverse effects like hypertension, tachycardia, or desiccation of respiratory secretions.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Priya P, Nath SS, Kumar V, Kumar S. Comparison of Nebulized Glycopyrronium with a Combination of Salbutamol and Ipratropium on Ventilatory Parameters in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(10):963-969.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Nebulized Glycopyrronium with a Combination of Salbutamol and Ipratropium on Ventilatory Parameters in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Preeti Priya, Soumya S Nath, Virendra Kumar, Suraj Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study examined the duration of bronchodilation induced by nebulized glycopyrronium bromide (GB) and compared its effectiveness and incidence of any side effects with the combination of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide (SI) in critically ill mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective, observational study was conducted in mechanically ventilated adult patients of COPD (18-75 years). Data of two groups of patients were collected for 12 hours each for three consecutive days after the nebulization - Group I: those who received 25 µg of GB, and Group II: those who received 1.25 mg of levo-salbutamol and 500 µg of ipratropium by nebulization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly higher number of patients in group II had copious secretions. The mean static compliance was comparable at all time intervals, whereas the mean airway pressure was significantly lower in group II from 15 minutes to 4 hours post-nebulization. In group I, the onset of bronchodilation was 30 minutes on days 1 and 3, and 60 minutes on day 2, whereas, in group II, it was 60 minutes on days 1 and 2 and 30 minutes on day 3. In group I, bronchodilation was 10 hours on day 1 and 12 hours each on days 2 and 3, whereas in group II, bronchodilation was 4 hours on day 1 and 6 hours each on day 2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with SI, GB nebulization resulted in lesser respiratory secretions, a longer duration of action in terms of lowered airway resistance, and no adverse effects like hypertension, tachycardia, or desiccation of respiratory secretions.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Priya P, Nath SS, Kumar V, Kumar S. Comparison of Nebulized Glycopyrronium with a Combination of Salbutamol and Ipratropium on Ventilatory Parameters in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(10):963-969.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471992/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究对重症机械通气慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者雾化吸入甘草溴铵(GB)诱导支气管扩张的持续时间进行了研究,并比较了其与沙丁胺醇和异丙托溴铵联合用药的效果和副作用发生率:这项前瞻性观察研究的对象是机械通气的慢性阻塞性肺病成年患者(18-75 岁)。收集了两组患者在雾化治疗后连续三天各 12 小时的数据--第一组:接受 25 µg GB 雾化治疗的患者;第二组:接受 1.25 mg 左旋沙丁胺醇和 500 µg 异丙托品雾化治疗的患者:结果:第二组中分泌物较多的患者人数明显较多。所有时间间隔内的平均静态顺应性相当,而在雾化后 15 分钟至 4 小时内,II 组的平均气道压明显较低。在 I 组中,第 1 天和第 3 天的支气管扩张开始时间为 30 分钟,第 2 天为 60 分钟,而在 II 组中,第 1 天和第 2 天为 60 分钟,第 3 天为 30 分钟。在 I 组中,第 1 天的支气管扩张时间为 10 小时,第 2 天和第 3 天各为 12 小时,而在 II 组中,第 1 天的支气管扩张时间为 4 小时,第 2 天和第 3 天各为 6 小时:与 SI 相比,GB 雾化治疗的呼吸道分泌物更少,降低气道阻力的作用时间更长,且无高血压、心动过速或呼吸道分泌物干燥等不良反应:Priya P, Nath SS, Kumar V, Kumar S. Comparison of Nebulized Glycopyrronium with a Combination of Salbutamol and Ipratropium on Ventilatory Parameters in Critically Illically Mechanically Ventilated Patients of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease:一项观察性研究。Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(10):963-969.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Nebulized Glycopyrronium with a Combination of Salbutamol and Ipratropium on Ventilatory Parameters in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Observational Study.

Background: The present study examined the duration of bronchodilation induced by nebulized glycopyrronium bromide (GB) and compared its effectiveness and incidence of any side effects with the combination of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide (SI) in critically ill mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.

Patients and methods: This prospective, observational study was conducted in mechanically ventilated adult patients of COPD (18-75 years). Data of two groups of patients were collected for 12 hours each for three consecutive days after the nebulization - Group I: those who received 25 µg of GB, and Group II: those who received 1.25 mg of levo-salbutamol and 500 µg of ipratropium by nebulization.

Results: A significantly higher number of patients in group II had copious secretions. The mean static compliance was comparable at all time intervals, whereas the mean airway pressure was significantly lower in group II from 15 minutes to 4 hours post-nebulization. In group I, the onset of bronchodilation was 30 minutes on days 1 and 3, and 60 minutes on day 2, whereas, in group II, it was 60 minutes on days 1 and 2 and 30 minutes on day 3. In group I, bronchodilation was 10 hours on day 1 and 12 hours each on days 2 and 3, whereas in group II, bronchodilation was 4 hours on day 1 and 6 hours each on day 2 and 3.

Conclusion: Compared with SI, GB nebulization resulted in lesser respiratory secretions, a longer duration of action in terms of lowered airway resistance, and no adverse effects like hypertension, tachycardia, or desiccation of respiratory secretions.

How to cite this article: Priya P, Nath SS, Kumar V, Kumar S. Comparison of Nebulized Glycopyrronium with a Combination of Salbutamol and Ipratropium on Ventilatory Parameters in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(10):963-969.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信