针对高负担非传染性疾病的保守非药物干预措施和指南实施方面的证据差距:综述协议。

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002032
Rebekka Döding, Tobias Braun, Katja Ehrenbrusthoff, Bernhard Elsner, Christian Kopkow, Toni Lange, Kerstin Lüdtke, Andres Jung, Clint Miller, Patrick J Owen, Tobias Saueressig, Axel Schäfer, Robin Schäfer, Tim Schleimer, Rilind Shala, Tibor Szikszay, Jochen Zebisch, Daniel L Belavý
{"title":"针对高负担非传染性疾病的保守非药物干预措施和指南实施方面的证据差距:综述协议。","authors":"Rebekka Döding, Tobias Braun, Katja Ehrenbrusthoff, Bernhard Elsner, Christian Kopkow, Toni Lange, Kerstin Lüdtke, Andres Jung, Clint Miller, Patrick J Owen, Tobias Saueressig, Axel Schäfer, Robin Schäfer, Tim Schleimer, Rilind Shala, Tibor Szikszay, Jochen Zebisch, Daniel L Belavý","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) represent a high burden for the society and affected individuals. Conservative non-pharmacological interventions play a first-line role in the treatment and management of most NCDs. Systematic reviews (SRs) provide the highest level of evidence and significantly influence clinical decision-making. The primary aim of this study is to provide an overview of the evidence on the effectiveness of recommended conservative non-pharmacological interventions for highly burdensome NCDs. The secondary aim is to provide an overview of the evidence for guideline implementation. A literature search was performed in Medline (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL. Six reviewers will, in duplicate, independently screen and select studies following eligibility criteria. The population will include individuals with NCDs from disease categories chosen based on WHO burden of disease data and the importance of conservative rehabilitation for their management. Eligible interventions will encompass conservative non-pharmacological approaches recommended by clinical practice guidelines (ie, physical, psychological and education/advice). Eligible comparator will include no or minimal intervention and other competitive interventions. Outcomes will comprise proposed core outcomes for the respective diseases, including patient-reported (eg, pain) and performance-based (eg, physical functioning) outcomes. SRs published in the last 5 years as peer-reviewed journal article in the English language will be eligible. The overview will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence gaps in conservative non-pharmacological interventions and guideline implementation for high-burden non-communicable diseases: protocol for an overview of reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Rebekka Döding, Tobias Braun, Katja Ehrenbrusthoff, Bernhard Elsner, Christian Kopkow, Toni Lange, Kerstin Lüdtke, Andres Jung, Clint Miller, Patrick J Owen, Tobias Saueressig, Axel Schäfer, Robin Schäfer, Tim Schleimer, Rilind Shala, Tibor Szikszay, Jochen Zebisch, Daniel L Belavý\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) represent a high burden for the society and affected individuals. Conservative non-pharmacological interventions play a first-line role in the treatment and management of most NCDs. Systematic reviews (SRs) provide the highest level of evidence and significantly influence clinical decision-making. The primary aim of this study is to provide an overview of the evidence on the effectiveness of recommended conservative non-pharmacological interventions for highly burdensome NCDs. The secondary aim is to provide an overview of the evidence for guideline implementation. A literature search was performed in Medline (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL. Six reviewers will, in duplicate, independently screen and select studies following eligibility criteria. The population will include individuals with NCDs from disease categories chosen based on WHO burden of disease data and the importance of conservative rehabilitation for their management. Eligible interventions will encompass conservative non-pharmacological approaches recommended by clinical practice guidelines (ie, physical, psychological and education/advice). Eligible comparator will include no or minimal intervention and other competitive interventions. Outcomes will comprise proposed core outcomes for the respective diseases, including patient-reported (eg, pain) and performance-based (eg, physical functioning) outcomes. SRs published in the last 5 years as peer-reviewed journal article in the English language will be eligible. The overview will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of reviews.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481113/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非传染性疾病(NCDs)给社会和患者带来沉重负担。保守的非药物干预措施在大多数非传染性疾病的治疗和管理中发挥着一线作用。系统综述(SR)提供了最高水平的证据,并对临床决策产生重大影响。本研究的主要目的是概述推荐的保守性非药物干预措施对高负担 NCDs 的有效性证据。其次是概述指南实施的证据。在 Medline (PubMed)、EMBASE 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 中进行了文献检索。六名审稿人将一式两份,独立筛选符合资格标准的研究。研究对象将包括根据世界卫生组织疾病负担数据和保守康复治疗的重要性而选择的疾病类别中的非传染性疾病患者。符合条件的干预措施将包括临床实践指南推荐的非药物保守疗法(即物理、心理和教育/建议)。符合条件的比较对象包括无干预或最小干预以及其他竞争性干预。结果将包括针对相应疾病提出的核心结果,包括患者报告的结果(如疼痛)和基于表现的结果(如身体机能)。在过去 5 年中以同行评审期刊文章形式发表的英文 SR 将符合条件。综述将根据综述首选报告项目进行报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence gaps in conservative non-pharmacological interventions and guideline implementation for high-burden non-communicable diseases: protocol for an overview of reviews.

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) represent a high burden for the society and affected individuals. Conservative non-pharmacological interventions play a first-line role in the treatment and management of most NCDs. Systematic reviews (SRs) provide the highest level of evidence and significantly influence clinical decision-making. The primary aim of this study is to provide an overview of the evidence on the effectiveness of recommended conservative non-pharmacological interventions for highly burdensome NCDs. The secondary aim is to provide an overview of the evidence for guideline implementation. A literature search was performed in Medline (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL. Six reviewers will, in duplicate, independently screen and select studies following eligibility criteria. The population will include individuals with NCDs from disease categories chosen based on WHO burden of disease data and the importance of conservative rehabilitation for their management. Eligible interventions will encompass conservative non-pharmacological approaches recommended by clinical practice guidelines (ie, physical, psychological and education/advice). Eligible comparator will include no or minimal intervention and other competitive interventions. Outcomes will comprise proposed core outcomes for the respective diseases, including patient-reported (eg, pain) and performance-based (eg, physical functioning) outcomes. SRs published in the last 5 years as peer-reviewed journal article in the English language will be eligible. The overview will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of reviews.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信