颞骨虚拟现实解剖模型在口腔颌面外科住院医师培训中的应用--收益还是小玩意?

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Friederike Everad, Tobias Albrecht, Jan Kromeier, Stephan Heermann, Philip von Schnakenburg, Tanja Hildenbrand, Iva Speck, Andreas Knopf, Christian Offergeld
{"title":"颞骨虚拟现实解剖模型在口腔颌面外科住院医师培训中的应用--收益还是小玩意?","authors":"Friederike Everad, Tobias Albrecht, Jan Kromeier, Stephan Heermann, Philip von Schnakenburg, Tanja Hildenbrand, Iva Speck, Andreas Knopf, Christian Offergeld","doi":"10.1177/23821205241281506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Virtual reality (VR) appears to be a promising educational tool for otorhinolaryngology (ORL) residency training, as it allows for safe and effective practice immediate feedback and potential improvements in patient outcomes. Despite these advantages, VR has not yet been incorporated into residency training in ORL, which may be due to limited availability or validation and skepticism toward incorporation of new training methods. This study investigates whether a VR model of the temporal bone improves learning success for ORL residents in comparison to standard plastic models and whether it depends on surgeon's experience. We also included a subjective evaluation of the learning experience with both models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ORL residents and specialists at 2 German university hospitals were tested on their knowledge of temporal bone anatomy after training with either VR or standard plastic models. In addition, we compared knowledge of the temporal bone anatomy before- and after-VR training. Lastly, a subjective survey on the benefits and limitations of VR was conducted to assess participants' views on this new technology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 85% of the participants considered VR to be better than conventional models and agreed that VR was a useful tool for teaching complex anatomy. Objective evaluation showed significant improvement in knowledge after using VR (before/after comparison), especially in participants with a higher level of preexisting knowledge. Direct comparison to conventional plastic models showed no superiority of the VR model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VR models in ORL are not only appealing and motivating for residents, but also objectively improve their anatomical knowledge, especially in advanced residency. In addition, VR-in contrast to the plastic model-offers opportunities for further development and optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Virtual Reality Anatomy Model of the Temporal Bone in ORL Residency Training-Gain or Gadget?\",\"authors\":\"Friederike Everad, Tobias Albrecht, Jan Kromeier, Stephan Heermann, Philip von Schnakenburg, Tanja Hildenbrand, Iva Speck, Andreas Knopf, Christian Offergeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23821205241281506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Virtual reality (VR) appears to be a promising educational tool for otorhinolaryngology (ORL) residency training, as it allows for safe and effective practice immediate feedback and potential improvements in patient outcomes. Despite these advantages, VR has not yet been incorporated into residency training in ORL, which may be due to limited availability or validation and skepticism toward incorporation of new training methods. This study investigates whether a VR model of the temporal bone improves learning success for ORL residents in comparison to standard plastic models and whether it depends on surgeon's experience. We also included a subjective evaluation of the learning experience with both models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ORL residents and specialists at 2 German university hospitals were tested on their knowledge of temporal bone anatomy after training with either VR or standard plastic models. In addition, we compared knowledge of the temporal bone anatomy before- and after-VR training. Lastly, a subjective survey on the benefits and limitations of VR was conducted to assess participants' views on this new technology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 85% of the participants considered VR to be better than conventional models and agreed that VR was a useful tool for teaching complex anatomy. Objective evaluation showed significant improvement in knowledge after using VR (before/after comparison), especially in participants with a higher level of preexisting knowledge. Direct comparison to conventional plastic models showed no superiority of the VR model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VR models in ORL are not only appealing and motivating for residents, but also objectively improve their anatomical knowledge, especially in advanced residency. In addition, VR-in contrast to the plastic model-offers opportunities for further development and optimization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483704/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241281506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241281506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虚拟现实(VR)似乎是耳鼻喉科(ORL)住院医师培训的一种很有前途的教育工具,因为它可以实现安全有效的即时反馈练习,并有可能改善患者的治疗效果。尽管VR具有这些优势,但它尚未被纳入耳鼻喉科住院医师培训中,这可能是由于其可用性或验证有限,以及对纳入新培训方法持怀疑态度。本研究调查了颞骨 VR 模型与标准整形模型相比是否能提高 ORL 住院医师的学习成功率,以及这是否取决于外科医生的经验。我们还对两种模型的学习体验进行了主观评估:方法:德国两所大学医院的口腔颌面外科住院医师和专科医生在使用 VR 或标准整形模型进行培训后,接受了颞骨解剖知识测试。此外,我们还对 VR 培训前后的颞骨解剖知识进行了比较。最后,我们还就 VR 的优点和局限性进行了主观调查,以评估参与者对这项新技术的看法:结果:约 85% 的参与者认为 VR 比传统模型更好,并同意 VR 是教授复杂解剖学的有用工具。客观评估显示,使用 VR 后(前后对比),尤其是原有知识水平较高的学员,知识水平有了明显提高。与传统塑料模型的直接比较显示,VR 模型没有优势:VR模型在口腔颌面外科中的应用不仅对住院医师具有吸引力和激励作用,还能客观地提高他们的解剖学知识,尤其是在高级住院医师培训中。此外,与塑料模型相比,VR 还提供了进一步发展和优化的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Virtual Reality Anatomy Model of the Temporal Bone in ORL Residency Training-Gain or Gadget?

Objectives: Virtual reality (VR) appears to be a promising educational tool for otorhinolaryngology (ORL) residency training, as it allows for safe and effective practice immediate feedback and potential improvements in patient outcomes. Despite these advantages, VR has not yet been incorporated into residency training in ORL, which may be due to limited availability or validation and skepticism toward incorporation of new training methods. This study investigates whether a VR model of the temporal bone improves learning success for ORL residents in comparison to standard plastic models and whether it depends on surgeon's experience. We also included a subjective evaluation of the learning experience with both models.

Methods: ORL residents and specialists at 2 German university hospitals were tested on their knowledge of temporal bone anatomy after training with either VR or standard plastic models. In addition, we compared knowledge of the temporal bone anatomy before- and after-VR training. Lastly, a subjective survey on the benefits and limitations of VR was conducted to assess participants' views on this new technology.

Results: About 85% of the participants considered VR to be better than conventional models and agreed that VR was a useful tool for teaching complex anatomy. Objective evaluation showed significant improvement in knowledge after using VR (before/after comparison), especially in participants with a higher level of preexisting knowledge. Direct comparison to conventional plastic models showed no superiority of the VR model.

Conclusion: VR models in ORL are not only appealing and motivating for residents, but also objectively improve their anatomical knowledge, especially in advanced residency. In addition, VR-in contrast to the plastic model-offers opportunities for further development and optimization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信