在欧洲扩大无烟和无气溶胶环境的最佳做法:专家咨询议定书》。

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2024-10-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/192786
Dolors Carnicer-Pont, Anna Mar López Luque, Biljana Kilibarda, Milena Vasic, Melinda Penzes, Chiara Stival, Adrian Gonzalez, Helena Koprivnikar, Giulia Carreras, Giuseppe Gorini, Irene Possenti, Alessandra Lugo, Silvano Gallus, Esteve Fernández
{"title":"在欧洲扩大无烟和无气溶胶环境的最佳做法:专家咨询议定书》。","authors":"Dolors Carnicer-Pont, Anna Mar López Luque, Biljana Kilibarda, Milena Vasic, Melinda Penzes, Chiara Stival, Adrian Gonzalez, Helena Koprivnikar, Giulia Carreras, Giuseppe Gorini, Irene Possenti, Alessandra Lugo, Silvano Gallus, Esteve Fernández","doi":"10.18332/tpc/192786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smoke-free legislation has been shown to positively impact reducing secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, especially in countries that have implemented comprehensive legislation rather than partial bans. Also, secondhand aerosols (SHA) that come from the heating of tobacco or liquids, with or without nicotine, in electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have been proven to increase levels of harmful substances in the air. Therefore, protection against SHS and SHA exposure and expansion of smoke- and aerosol-free environments (SAFE) should be taken into account when creating or trying to expand or enforce clean air policies. This article aims to present the protocol for a consultation with experts on tobacco and nicotine control in order to identify best practices, barriers, and opportunities for the expansion of SAFE in Europe. We identified experts among policymakers, researchers, and tobacco regulators in European countries and invited them to participate in the consultation by completing an online survey designed, programmed, and pilot-tested using Survey Monkey. The responses to the questionnaire contained quantitative and qualitative information that was thematically analyzed. The experts' consultation allowed us to produce a report on barriers and opportunities for SAFE, a report and a position paper on SAFE best practices, a web-based repository of best practices, and a weight of evidence paper that assembles evidence supporting the expansion of SAFE on indoor and outdoor spaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best practices for expansion of smoke-free and aerosol-free environments in Europe: Protocol for the consultation to experts.\",\"authors\":\"Dolors Carnicer-Pont, Anna Mar López Luque, Biljana Kilibarda, Milena Vasic, Melinda Penzes, Chiara Stival, Adrian Gonzalez, Helena Koprivnikar, Giulia Carreras, Giuseppe Gorini, Irene Possenti, Alessandra Lugo, Silvano Gallus, Esteve Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/tpc/192786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Smoke-free legislation has been shown to positively impact reducing secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, especially in countries that have implemented comprehensive legislation rather than partial bans. Also, secondhand aerosols (SHA) that come from the heating of tobacco or liquids, with or without nicotine, in electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have been proven to increase levels of harmful substances in the air. Therefore, protection against SHS and SHA exposure and expansion of smoke- and aerosol-free environments (SAFE) should be taken into account when creating or trying to expand or enforce clean air policies. This article aims to present the protocol for a consultation with experts on tobacco and nicotine control in order to identify best practices, barriers, and opportunities for the expansion of SAFE in Europe. We identified experts among policymakers, researchers, and tobacco regulators in European countries and invited them to participate in the consultation by completing an online survey designed, programmed, and pilot-tested using Survey Monkey. The responses to the questionnaire contained quantitative and qualitative information that was thematically analyzed. The experts' consultation allowed us to produce a report on barriers and opportunities for SAFE, a report and a position paper on SAFE best practices, a web-based repository of best practices, and a weight of evidence paper that assembles evidence supporting the expansion of SAFE on indoor and outdoor spaces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487914/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/192786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/192786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无烟立法已被证明对减少二手烟(SHS)暴露产生了积极影响,尤其是在实施全面立法而非部分禁令的国家。此外,电子尼古丁递送系统(ENDS)中加热烟草或液体(无论是否含有尼古丁)所产生的二手气溶胶(SHA)已被证明会增加空气中有害物质的含量。因此,在制定或试图扩大或执行清洁空气政策时,应考虑到防止接触 SHS 和 SHA 以及扩大无烟和无气溶胶环境(SAFE)。本文旨在介绍烟草和尼古丁控制专家咨询协议,以确定在欧洲推广无烟环境的最佳实践、障碍和机遇。我们在欧洲各国的政策制定者、研究人员和烟草监管者中物色了专家,并邀请他们通过填写一份在线调查问卷参与咨询,该调查问卷由 Survey Monkey 设计、编程并进行了试点测试。调查问卷的回复包含定量和定性信息,并对这些信息进行了专题分析。通过专家咨询,我们编写了一份关于 SAFE 面临的障碍和机遇的报告、一份关于 SAFE 最佳实践的报告和立场文件、一个基于网络的最佳实践库,以及一份汇集了支持在室内和室外空间推广 SAFE 的证据的证据权重文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Best practices for expansion of smoke-free and aerosol-free environments in Europe: Protocol for the consultation to experts.

Smoke-free legislation has been shown to positively impact reducing secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, especially in countries that have implemented comprehensive legislation rather than partial bans. Also, secondhand aerosols (SHA) that come from the heating of tobacco or liquids, with or without nicotine, in electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have been proven to increase levels of harmful substances in the air. Therefore, protection against SHS and SHA exposure and expansion of smoke- and aerosol-free environments (SAFE) should be taken into account when creating or trying to expand or enforce clean air policies. This article aims to present the protocol for a consultation with experts on tobacco and nicotine control in order to identify best practices, barriers, and opportunities for the expansion of SAFE in Europe. We identified experts among policymakers, researchers, and tobacco regulators in European countries and invited them to participate in the consultation by completing an online survey designed, programmed, and pilot-tested using Survey Monkey. The responses to the questionnaire contained quantitative and qualitative information that was thematically analyzed. The experts' consultation allowed us to produce a report on barriers and opportunities for SAFE, a report and a position paper on SAFE best practices, a web-based repository of best practices, and a weight of evidence paper that assembles evidence supporting the expansion of SAFE on indoor and outdoor spaces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信