我相信谁会代表我?长期护理居民和家庭对合法代表的看法。

Q2 Medicine
Jeonghwa You, Katherine Boothe, Rebecca Ganann, Michael Wilson, Julia Abelson
{"title":"我相信谁会代表我?长期护理居民和家庭对合法代表的看法。","authors":"Jeonghwa You, Katherine Boothe, Rebecca Ganann, Michael Wilson, Julia Abelson","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2024.27414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Public engagement in long-term care policy making in Canada has primarily focused on \"intermediary agents\" who speak on behalf of long-term care (LTC) residents and their family caregivers. Yet the legitimacy of these intermediaries, as perceived by those they represent, has gone largely unexplored. This study examines LTC resident and family perspectives on who can legitimately represent them in LTC policy making.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We used an interpretive description design, drawing on semi-structured interviews with LTC residents and family caregivers in Ontario, Canada. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen interviews were conducted with 19 participants. Three key characteristics of legitimate representatives were identified: (1) willingness to act in the best interests of residents and families, (2) having the necessary skills and capacity to participate in LTC policy making and (3) engaging directly with residents and families.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Governments and civil society organizations seeking to establish and maintain legitimacy in the eyes of LTC residents and family members can pursue this goal by supporting intermediaries who mirror the identities or experiences of those they represent, who are dedicated to serving their interests and who routinely and directly engage with them to understand the realities of LTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"20 SP","pages":"48-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whom Do I Trust to Represent Me? Long-Term Care Resident and Family Perspectives on Legitimate Representation.\",\"authors\":\"Jeonghwa You, Katherine Boothe, Rebecca Ganann, Michael Wilson, Julia Abelson\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/hcpol.2024.27414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Public engagement in long-term care policy making in Canada has primarily focused on \\\"intermediary agents\\\" who speak on behalf of long-term care (LTC) residents and their family caregivers. Yet the legitimacy of these intermediaries, as perceived by those they represent, has gone largely unexplored. This study examines LTC resident and family perspectives on who can legitimately represent them in LTC policy making.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We used an interpretive description design, drawing on semi-structured interviews with LTC residents and family caregivers in Ontario, Canada. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen interviews were conducted with 19 participants. Three key characteristics of legitimate representatives were identified: (1) willingness to act in the best interests of residents and families, (2) having the necessary skills and capacity to participate in LTC policy making and (3) engaging directly with residents and families.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Governments and civil society organizations seeking to establish and maintain legitimacy in the eyes of LTC residents and family members can pursue this goal by supporting intermediaries who mirror the identities or experiences of those they represent, who are dedicated to serving their interests and who routinely and directly engage with them to understand the realities of LTC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"20 SP\",\"pages\":\"48-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523119/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2024.27414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2024.27414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:加拿大公众对长期护理政策制定的参与主要集中在 "中介代理 "上,他们代表长期护理(LTC)居民及其家庭护理者发言。然而,这些中间人所代表的那些人对其合法性的看法在很大程度上尚未得到探讨。本研究探讨了长期护理居民和家庭对谁能在长期护理政策制定中合法代表他们的看法:我们采用解释性描述设计,对加拿大安大略省的长者照护中心居民和家庭照护者进行了半结构化访谈。采用归纳式主题分析法对数据进行分析:对 19 名参与者进行了 18 次访谈。确定了合法代表的三个主要特征:(1) 愿意以居民和家庭的最大利益为重,(2) 具备必要的技能和能力参与长期护理政策的制定,(3) 直接与居民和家庭接触:政府和民间社会组织要想在长 期护理机构居民和家庭成员心目中建立并保持合法性,可以通过支持那些反映其所代表的人 的身份或经历、致力于为他们的利益服务、经常直接与他们接触以了解长 期护理机构现实情况的中介机构来实现这一目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whom Do I Trust to Represent Me? Long-Term Care Resident and Family Perspectives on Legitimate Representation.

Introduction: Public engagement in long-term care policy making in Canada has primarily focused on "intermediary agents" who speak on behalf of long-term care (LTC) residents and their family caregivers. Yet the legitimacy of these intermediaries, as perceived by those they represent, has gone largely unexplored. This study examines LTC resident and family perspectives on who can legitimately represent them in LTC policy making.

Methodology: We used an interpretive description design, drawing on semi-structured interviews with LTC residents and family caregivers in Ontario, Canada. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Eighteen interviews were conducted with 19 participants. Three key characteristics of legitimate representatives were identified: (1) willingness to act in the best interests of residents and families, (2) having the necessary skills and capacity to participate in LTC policy making and (3) engaging directly with residents and families.

Conclusion: Governments and civil society organizations seeking to establish and maintain legitimacy in the eyes of LTC residents and family members can pursue this goal by supporting intermediaries who mirror the identities or experiences of those they represent, who are dedicated to serving their interests and who routinely and directly engage with them to understand the realities of LTC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信