使用 CIPP 模型,从学生角度评估基于案例的基础-临床综合药理学学习计划。

Korean journal of medical education Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-17 DOI:10.3946/kjme.2024.308
Hee Jae Lee, Seok Hoon Kang, Sang In Park, Wan Joo Chun, Kwon In Youk
{"title":"使用 CIPP 模型,从学生角度评估基于案例的基础-临床综合药理学学习计划。","authors":"Hee Jae Lee, Seok Hoon Kang, Sang In Park, Wan Joo Chun, Kwon In Youk","doi":"10.3946/kjme.2024.308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of case-based learning (CBL) within a basic-clinical integrated educational program using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CBL program was integrated into the Pharmacology-Clinical Case Practice component of the pharmacology course, a mandatory course for first-year medical students. To evaluate the program, a CIPP model-based questionnaire was developed, assessing needs, goals, resources, educational management, and outcomes. To ensure the reliability and validity of the variables, factor analysis was performed, reducing an initial set of 28 items to 18 final observation variables distributed across four factors. The survey, designed to measure learner satisfaction, was administered to 37 students who participated in the Pharmacology-Clinical Case Practice course during the first semester of 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants rated their satisfaction with the CBL program based on the CIPP model (on a 5-point scale), giving an average score of 4.17. This suggests that learners who followed the CBL program combining basic and clinical components generally found the program operationally effective with positive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The teaching model and evaluation model applied in this study can be utilized in various majors when operating CBL classes that link basic and clinical education in medical schools in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":37737,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of medical education","volume":" ","pages":"429-434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a basic-clinical integrated pharmacology case-based learning program from a student perspective using the CIPP model.\",\"authors\":\"Hee Jae Lee, Seok Hoon Kang, Sang In Park, Wan Joo Chun, Kwon In Youk\",\"doi\":\"10.3946/kjme.2024.308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of case-based learning (CBL) within a basic-clinical integrated educational program using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CBL program was integrated into the Pharmacology-Clinical Case Practice component of the pharmacology course, a mandatory course for first-year medical students. To evaluate the program, a CIPP model-based questionnaire was developed, assessing needs, goals, resources, educational management, and outcomes. To ensure the reliability and validity of the variables, factor analysis was performed, reducing an initial set of 28 items to 18 final observation variables distributed across four factors. The survey, designed to measure learner satisfaction, was administered to 37 students who participated in the Pharmacology-Clinical Case Practice course during the first semester of 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants rated their satisfaction with the CBL program based on the CIPP model (on a 5-point scale), giving an average score of 4.17. This suggests that learners who followed the CBL program combining basic and clinical components generally found the program operationally effective with positive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The teaching model and evaluation model applied in this study can be utilized in various majors when operating CBL classes that link basic and clinical education in medical schools in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean journal of medical education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"429-434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625906/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean journal of medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2024.308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2024.308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在采用情境、输入、过程和产品(CIPP)评估模型,系统评估基础-临床综合教育课程中基于病例的学习(CBL)的有效性:方法:CBL 课程被整合到药理学课程的药理学-临床病例实践部分,这是医学专业一年级学生的必修课程。为了评估该项目,我们开发了一份基于 CIPP 模型的调查问卷,对需求、目标、资源、教育管理和结果进行评估。为确保变量的可靠性和有效性,我们进行了因子分析,将最初的 28 个项目减少到 18 个最终观察变量,这些变量分布在四个因子中。该调查旨在衡量学员的满意度,对 2022 年第一学期参加药理学-临床病例实践课程的 37 名学生进行了调查:参与者根据 CIPP 模型对 CBL 课程的满意度进行了评分(5 分制),平均分为 4.17 分。这表明,参加结合基础和临床部分的 CBL 课程的学员普遍认为该课程操作有效,效果良好:本研究中应用的教学模式和评价模型可用于今后医学院各专业开设基础与临床相结合的 CBL 课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a basic-clinical integrated pharmacology case-based learning program from a student perspective using the CIPP model.

Purpose: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of case-based learning (CBL) within a basic-clinical integrated educational program using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model.

Methods: The CBL program was integrated into the Pharmacology-Clinical Case Practice component of the pharmacology course, a mandatory course for first-year medical students. To evaluate the program, a CIPP model-based questionnaire was developed, assessing needs, goals, resources, educational management, and outcomes. To ensure the reliability and validity of the variables, factor analysis was performed, reducing an initial set of 28 items to 18 final observation variables distributed across four factors. The survey, designed to measure learner satisfaction, was administered to 37 students who participated in the Pharmacology-Clinical Case Practice course during the first semester of 2022.

Results: Participants rated their satisfaction with the CBL program based on the CIPP model (on a 5-point scale), giving an average score of 4.17. This suggests that learners who followed the CBL program combining basic and clinical components generally found the program operationally effective with positive outcomes.

Conclusion: The teaching model and evaluation model applied in this study can be utilized in various majors when operating CBL classes that link basic and clinical education in medical schools in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean journal of medical education
Korean journal of medical education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to provide theoretical foundations, practical analysis, and up-to-date developments in health professional education: Curriculum development Teaching and learning Student assessment Educational evaluation Educational management and policy The journal welcomes high-quality papers on all levels of health professional education, including: Undergraduate education Postgraduate training Continuous professional development Interprofessional education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信