一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,调查草药配方对成人膝骨关节炎患者膝关节功能的安全性和有效性。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Li Li, Yuanyuan Wang, Shanglong Wang, Jiancheng Zong, Zengliang Zhang, Shengcan Zou, Zhen Zhao, Yu Cao, Zimin Liu
{"title":"一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,调查草药配方对成人膝骨关节炎患者膝关节功能的安全性和有效性。","authors":"Li Li, Yuanyuan Wang, Shanglong Wang, Jiancheng Zong, Zengliang Zhang, Shengcan Zou, Zhen Zhao, Yu Cao, Zimin Liu","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Current treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) pain and stiffness have limitations, including adverse effects. Therefore, effective and safe complementary or alternative therapies are needed. Dietary supplement GJ 191, comprising <i>Epimedium, Dioscorea, and Salvia miltiorrhiza</i> extracts, may address this need. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated GJ 191 supplementation on knee OA symptoms. Seventy-two adults (40-75 years) with mild to moderate knee OA and mild to moderate knee pain were enrolled. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quality of Life questionnaire, knee joint range of motion, serum C-reactive protein, and rescue medication use were assessed. The Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and stiffness scores were computed using KOOS scores. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Decreases in WOMAC pain scores were reported by both GJ 191 and placebo groups after 6 (-1.78 ± 2.71 and -1.34 ± 1.93, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and 12 (-2.31 ± 2.83 and -1.59 ± 2.69, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.01) weeks, with no significant difference between groups. There were decreases in WOMAC stiffness scores for participants supplemented with GJ 191 by 0.53 ± 1.22 and 0.72 ± 1.46 (<i>p</i> ≤0.02) after 6 and 12 weeks, respectively, with respective decreases of 0.81 ± 1.51 and 0.75 ± 1.85 (<i>p</i> ≤0.03) for those on placebo. Significant improvements in current pain, as assessed by the Pain VAS, and bodily pain were reported by the GJ 191 group after 6 and 12 weeks, while the placebo group only reported significant improvements in these measures after 12 weeks. GJ 191 supplementation was safe and well tolerated. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> There was no significant difference in pain and stiffness scores between GJ 191 and placebo over the 12 weeks. While both groups reported improvements in WOMAC pain from baseline, improvements in current and bodily pain were experienced sooner with GJ 191 than placebo and were sustained over the study period. GJ 191 supplementation was safe and well tolerated. (CTR#: NCT04395547).</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Investigating the Safety And Efficacy of a Herbal Formulation on Knee Joint Function in Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Li Li, Yuanyuan Wang, Shanglong Wang, Jiancheng Zong, Zengliang Zhang, Shengcan Zou, Zhen Zhao, Yu Cao, Zimin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jicm.2023.0124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Current treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) pain and stiffness have limitations, including adverse effects. Therefore, effective and safe complementary or alternative therapies are needed. Dietary supplement GJ 191, comprising <i>Epimedium, Dioscorea, and Salvia miltiorrhiza</i> extracts, may address this need. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated GJ 191 supplementation on knee OA symptoms. Seventy-two adults (40-75 years) with mild to moderate knee OA and mild to moderate knee pain were enrolled. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quality of Life questionnaire, knee joint range of motion, serum C-reactive protein, and rescue medication use were assessed. The Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and stiffness scores were computed using KOOS scores. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Decreases in WOMAC pain scores were reported by both GJ 191 and placebo groups after 6 (-1.78 ± 2.71 and -1.34 ± 1.93, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and 12 (-2.31 ± 2.83 and -1.59 ± 2.69, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.01) weeks, with no significant difference between groups. There were decreases in WOMAC stiffness scores for participants supplemented with GJ 191 by 0.53 ± 1.22 and 0.72 ± 1.46 (<i>p</i> ≤0.02) after 6 and 12 weeks, respectively, with respective decreases of 0.81 ± 1.51 and 0.75 ± 1.85 (<i>p</i> ≤0.03) for those on placebo. Significant improvements in current pain, as assessed by the Pain VAS, and bodily pain were reported by the GJ 191 group after 6 and 12 weeks, while the placebo group only reported significant improvements in these measures after 12 weeks. GJ 191 supplementation was safe and well tolerated. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> There was no significant difference in pain and stiffness scores between GJ 191 and placebo over the 12 weeks. While both groups reported improvements in WOMAC pain from baseline, improvements in current and bodily pain were experienced sooner with GJ 191 than placebo and were sustained over the study period. GJ 191 supplementation was safe and well tolerated. (CTR#: NCT04395547).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2023.0124\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2023.0124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前治疗骨关节炎(OA)疼痛和僵硬的方法有其局限性,包括不良反应。因此,需要有效、安全的补充或替代疗法。由淫羊藿、薯蓣和丹参提取物组成的膳食补充剂 GJ 191 可满足这一需求。研究方法这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究调查了补充 GJ 191 对膝关节 OA 症状的影响。72名患有轻度至中度膝关节OA和轻度至中度膝关节疼痛的成年人(40-75岁)参加了研究。研究人员对膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、生活质量问卷、膝关节活动范围、血清 C 反应蛋白和抢救药物使用情况进行了评估。西安大略麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)的疼痛和僵硬评分是根据 KOOS 评分计算得出的。结果显示GJ 191组和安慰剂组的WOMAC疼痛评分在6周(分别为-1.78 ± 2.71和-1.34 ± 1.93;p < 0.01)和12周(分别为-2.31 ± 2.83和-1.59 ± 2.69;p < 0.01)后均有所下降,组间差异不显著。服用GJ 191的患者在6周和12周后,WOMAC僵硬度评分分别下降了0.53 ± 1.22和0.72 ± 1.46(p≤0.02),而服用安慰剂的患者则分别下降了0.81 ± 1.51和0.75 ± 1.85(p≤0.03)。GJ 191 组在 6 周和 12 周后,通过疼痛 VAS 评估的当前疼痛和身体疼痛均有明显改善,而安慰剂组仅在 12 周后这些指标有明显改善。补充 GJ 191 安全且耐受性良好。结论在 12 周内,GJ 191 和安慰剂在疼痛和僵硬评分方面没有明显差异。虽然两组患者的 WOMAC 疼痛都比基线有所改善,但 GJ 191 比安慰剂更快改善当前疼痛和身体疼痛,并在研究期间持续改善。补充 GJ 191 安全且耐受性良好。(CTR#:NCT04395547)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Investigating the Safety And Efficacy of a Herbal Formulation on Knee Joint Function in Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis.

Background: Current treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) pain and stiffness have limitations, including adverse effects. Therefore, effective and safe complementary or alternative therapies are needed. Dietary supplement GJ 191, comprising Epimedium, Dioscorea, and Salvia miltiorrhiza extracts, may address this need. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated GJ 191 supplementation on knee OA symptoms. Seventy-two adults (40-75 years) with mild to moderate knee OA and mild to moderate knee pain were enrolled. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quality of Life questionnaire, knee joint range of motion, serum C-reactive protein, and rescue medication use were assessed. The Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and stiffness scores were computed using KOOS scores. Results: Decreases in WOMAC pain scores were reported by both GJ 191 and placebo groups after 6 (-1.78 ± 2.71 and -1.34 ± 1.93, respectively; p < 0.01) and 12 (-2.31 ± 2.83 and -1.59 ± 2.69, respectively; p < 0.01) weeks, with no significant difference between groups. There were decreases in WOMAC stiffness scores for participants supplemented with GJ 191 by 0.53 ± 1.22 and 0.72 ± 1.46 (p ≤0.02) after 6 and 12 weeks, respectively, with respective decreases of 0.81 ± 1.51 and 0.75 ± 1.85 (p ≤0.03) for those on placebo. Significant improvements in current pain, as assessed by the Pain VAS, and bodily pain were reported by the GJ 191 group after 6 and 12 weeks, while the placebo group only reported significant improvements in these measures after 12 weeks. GJ 191 supplementation was safe and well tolerated. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in pain and stiffness scores between GJ 191 and placebo over the 12 weeks. While both groups reported improvements in WOMAC pain from baseline, improvements in current and bodily pain were experienced sooner with GJ 191 than placebo and were sustained over the study period. GJ 191 supplementation was safe and well tolerated. (CTR#: NCT04395547).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信