[产科人工智能辅助决策--关于 ChatGPT 医疗准确性和可靠性的可行性研究]。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Simon Bader, Michael O Schneider, Iason Psilopatis, Daniel Anetsberger, Julius Emons, Sven Kehl
{"title":"[产科人工智能辅助决策--关于 ChatGPT 医疗准确性和可靠性的可行性研究]。","authors":"Simon Bader, Michael O Schneider, Iason Psilopatis, Daniel Anetsberger, Julius Emons, Sven Kehl","doi":"10.1055/a-2411-9516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of artificial intelligence in the interpretation and application of medical guidelines to support clinical decision-making in obstetrics. ChatGPT was provided with guidelines on specific obstetric issues. Using several clinical scenarios as examples, the AI was then evaluated for its ability to make accurate diagnoses and appropriate clinical decisions. The results varied, with ChatGPT providing predominantly correct answers in some fictional scenarios but performing inadequately in others. Despite ChatGPT's ability to grasp complex medical information, the study revealed limitations in the precision and reliability of its interpretations and recommendations. These discrepancies highlight the need for careful review by healthcare professionals and underscore the importance of clear, unambiguous guideline recommendations. Furthermore, continuous technical development is required to harness artificial intelligence as a supportive tool in clinical practice. Overall, while the use of AI in medicine shows promise, its current suitability primarily lies in controlled scientific settings due to potential error susceptibility and interpretation weaknesses, aiming to safeguard the safety and accuracy of patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[AI-supported decision-making in obstetrics - a feasibility study on the medical accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT].\",\"authors\":\"Simon Bader, Michael O Schneider, Iason Psilopatis, Daniel Anetsberger, Julius Emons, Sven Kehl\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2411-9516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of artificial intelligence in the interpretation and application of medical guidelines to support clinical decision-making in obstetrics. ChatGPT was provided with guidelines on specific obstetric issues. Using several clinical scenarios as examples, the AI was then evaluated for its ability to make accurate diagnoses and appropriate clinical decisions. The results varied, with ChatGPT providing predominantly correct answers in some fictional scenarios but performing inadequately in others. Despite ChatGPT's ability to grasp complex medical information, the study revealed limitations in the precision and reliability of its interpretations and recommendations. These discrepancies highlight the need for careful review by healthcare professionals and underscore the importance of clear, unambiguous guideline recommendations. Furthermore, continuous technical development is required to harness artificial intelligence as a supportive tool in clinical practice. Overall, while the use of AI in medicine shows promise, its current suitability primarily lies in controlled scientific settings due to potential error susceptibility and interpretation weaknesses, aiming to safeguard the safety and accuracy of patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2411-9516\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2411-9516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨人工智能在解释和应用医疗指南以支持产科临床决策方面的可行性。研究人员向 ChatGPT 提供了有关特定产科问题的指南。以几个临床场景为例,对人工智能做出准确诊断和适当临床决策的能力进行了评估。结果不尽相同,ChatGPT 在一些虚构的场景中主要提供了正确的答案,但在另一些场景中却表现不佳。尽管 ChatGPT 能够掌握复杂的医疗信息,但研究显示其解释和建议的准确性和可靠性存在局限。这些差异凸显了医护人员仔细审查的必要性,并强调了清晰明确的指南建议的重要性。此外,要将人工智能作为临床实践中的辅助工具,还需要不断进行技术开发。总之,虽然人工智能在医学中的应用前景广阔,但由于其潜在的易错性和解释弱点,目前主要适用于受控科学环境,旨在保障患者护理的安全性和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[AI-supported decision-making in obstetrics - a feasibility study on the medical accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT].

The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of artificial intelligence in the interpretation and application of medical guidelines to support clinical decision-making in obstetrics. ChatGPT was provided with guidelines on specific obstetric issues. Using several clinical scenarios as examples, the AI was then evaluated for its ability to make accurate diagnoses and appropriate clinical decisions. The results varied, with ChatGPT providing predominantly correct answers in some fictional scenarios but performing inadequately in others. Despite ChatGPT's ability to grasp complex medical information, the study revealed limitations in the precision and reliability of its interpretations and recommendations. These discrepancies highlight the need for careful review by healthcare professionals and underscore the importance of clear, unambiguous guideline recommendations. Furthermore, continuous technical development is required to harness artificial intelligence as a supportive tool in clinical practice. Overall, while the use of AI in medicine shows promise, its current suitability primarily lies in controlled scientific settings due to potential error susceptibility and interpretation weaknesses, aiming to safeguard the safety and accuracy of patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynäkologen, Geburtshelfer, Hebammen, Neonatologen, Pädiater
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信