Shiv Bhakta, Mohammed M Chowdhury, Jason M Tarkin, James Hf Rudd, Elizabeth A Warburton, Nicholas R Evans
{"title":"有症状与无症状动脉粥样硬化性疾病血管 PET 成像的 18F-NaF 摄取:荟萃分析。","authors":"Shiv Bhakta, Mohammed M Chowdhury, Jason M Tarkin, James Hf Rudd, Elizabeth A Warburton, Nicholas R Evans","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241287692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-sodium fluoride (NaF) positron-emission tomography (PET) is increasingly being used to measure microcalcification in atherosclerotic disease in vivo. Correlations have been drawn between sodium fluoride uptake and the presence of high-risk plaque features, as well as its association with clinical atherosclerotic sequelae. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of NaF uptake on PET imaging and its relation to symptomatic and asymptomatic disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, via searching the Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases up to May 2024. The search strategy included the terms 'NaF', 'PET', and 'plaque', and all studies with data regarding the degree of microcalcification, as measured by <sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake in symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques, were included. Analysis involved calculating mean differences between uptake values and comparison using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 articles, involving 423 participants, were included in the meta-analysis (10 carotid artery studies, five coronary artery studies, and one in peripheral vascular disease). Comparing <sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake in symptomatic versus asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques, a mean difference of 0.43 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.57; <i>p</i> < 0.0001, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 65%) was noted in studies comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques in the same participant, with a significant difference in effect based on arterial territory studied (χ<sup>2</sup> = 12.68, <i>p</i> = 0.0018). In studies of participants with and without symptomatic disease, there was no significant difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques (mean difference 0.27, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.80, <i>p</i> = 0.28, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 85%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PET imaging using <sup>18</sup>F-NaF can detect differences in microcalcification between symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques within, but not between, individuals, and thus, is a marker of symptomatic disease. The standardization of <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET imaging protocols, and its future use as a risk stratification tool or outcome measure, requires further study. (PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42023451363).</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X241287692"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake on vascular PET imaging in symptomatic versus asymptomatic atherosclerotic disease: A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shiv Bhakta, Mohammed M Chowdhury, Jason M Tarkin, James Hf Rudd, Elizabeth A Warburton, Nicholas R Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1358863X241287692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-sodium fluoride (NaF) positron-emission tomography (PET) is increasingly being used to measure microcalcification in atherosclerotic disease in vivo. Correlations have been drawn between sodium fluoride uptake and the presence of high-risk plaque features, as well as its association with clinical atherosclerotic sequelae. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of NaF uptake on PET imaging and its relation to symptomatic and asymptomatic disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, via searching the Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases up to May 2024. The search strategy included the terms 'NaF', 'PET', and 'plaque', and all studies with data regarding the degree of microcalcification, as measured by <sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake in symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques, were included. Analysis involved calculating mean differences between uptake values and comparison using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 articles, involving 423 participants, were included in the meta-analysis (10 carotid artery studies, five coronary artery studies, and one in peripheral vascular disease). Comparing <sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake in symptomatic versus asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques, a mean difference of 0.43 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.57; <i>p</i> < 0.0001, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 65%) was noted in studies comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques in the same participant, with a significant difference in effect based on arterial territory studied (χ<sup>2</sup> = 12.68, <i>p</i> = 0.0018). In studies of participants with and without symptomatic disease, there was no significant difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques (mean difference 0.27, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.80, <i>p</i> = 0.28, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 85%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PET imaging using <sup>18</sup>F-NaF can detect differences in microcalcification between symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques within, but not between, individuals, and thus, is a marker of symptomatic disease. The standardization of <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET imaging protocols, and its future use as a risk stratification tool or outcome measure, requires further study. (PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42023451363).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1358863X241287692\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X241287692\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X241287692","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:18F-氟化钠(NaF)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)正越来越多地被用于测量体内动脉粥样硬化疾病的微钙化。氟化钠摄取量与高风险斑块特征的存在以及与临床动脉粥样硬化后遗症之间存在相关性。本研究的目的是对 PET 成像的氟化钠摄取量及其与无症状和无症状疾病的关系进行荟萃分析:根据PRISMA指南,通过检索Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase、Cochrane Library、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science Core Collection数据库(截至2024年5月)进行了系统性综述。检索策略包括 "NaF"、"PET "和 "斑块 "等术语,并纳入了所有通过有症状和无症状动脉粥样硬化斑块的18F-NaF摄取量测量微钙化程度的研究数据。分析包括计算摄取值之间的平均差异,并使用随机效应模型进行比较:荟萃分析共纳入16篇文章,涉及423名参与者(10项颈动脉研究、5项冠状动脉研究和1项外周血管疾病研究)。比较无症状和无症状动脉粥样硬化斑块的18F-NaF摄取量,发现在比较同一参与者的无症状和无症状斑块的研究中,平均差异为0.43(95% CI 0.29至0.57;p < 0.0001,I2 = 65%),根据研究的动脉区域,效果差异显著(χ2 = 12.68,p = 0.0018)。在对有症状和无症状的参与者进行的研究中,有症状和无症状斑块之间没有显著差异(平均差异为0.27,95% CI -0.26至0.80,p = 0.28,I2 = 85%):结论:使用18F-NaF的PET成像能检测出个体内部有症状和无症状动脉粥样硬化斑块之间微钙化的差异,但不能检测出个体之间的差异,因此是无症状疾病的标志物。18F-NaF PET 成像方案的标准化及其未来作为风险分层工具或结果测量指标的应用还需要进一步研究。(PROSPERO注册编号:CRD42023451363)。
18F-NaF uptake on vascular PET imaging in symptomatic versus asymptomatic atherosclerotic disease: A meta-analysis.
Introduction: 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) positron-emission tomography (PET) is increasingly being used to measure microcalcification in atherosclerotic disease in vivo. Correlations have been drawn between sodium fluoride uptake and the presence of high-risk plaque features, as well as its association with clinical atherosclerotic sequelae. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of NaF uptake on PET imaging and its relation to symptomatic and asymptomatic disease.
Methods: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, via searching the Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases up to May 2024. The search strategy included the terms 'NaF', 'PET', and 'plaque', and all studies with data regarding the degree of microcalcification, as measured by 18F-NaF uptake in symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques, were included. Analysis involved calculating mean differences between uptake values and comparison using a random-effects model.
Results: A total of 16 articles, involving 423 participants, were included in the meta-analysis (10 carotid artery studies, five coronary artery studies, and one in peripheral vascular disease). Comparing 18F-NaF uptake in symptomatic versus asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques, a mean difference of 0.43 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.57; p < 0.0001, I2 = 65%) was noted in studies comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques in the same participant, with a significant difference in effect based on arterial territory studied (χ2 = 12.68, p = 0.0018). In studies of participants with and without symptomatic disease, there was no significant difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques (mean difference 0.27, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.80, p = 0.28, I2 = 85%).
Conclusions: PET imaging using 18F-NaF can detect differences in microcalcification between symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques within, but not between, individuals, and thus, is a marker of symptomatic disease. The standardization of 18F-NaF PET imaging protocols, and its future use as a risk stratification tool or outcome measure, requires further study. (PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42023451363).
期刊介绍:
The premier, ISI-ranked journal of vascular medicine. Integrates the latest research in vascular biology with advancements for the practice of vascular medicine and vascular surgery. It features original research and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for vascular disease. A member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)