根据程序性细胞死亡配体 1 在非小细胞肺癌和脑转移患者中的表达情况确定免疫检查点抑制剂的疗效:一项真实世界前瞻性观察研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Takeshi Masuda, Yukari Tsubata, Kojirou Hata, Mika Horie, Katsuyuki Kiura, Nobuhiro Kanaji, Takuya Inoue, Masahiro Kodani, Masaaki Yanai, Kakuhiro Yamaguchi, Naoko Matsumoto, Masahiro Yamasaki, Nobuhisa Ishikawa, Ken Masuda, Nagio Takigawa, Shoichi Kuyama, Tetsuya Kubota, Kazuya Nishii, Katsuyuki Hotta, Noboru Hattori
{"title":"根据程序性细胞死亡配体 1 在非小细胞肺癌和脑转移患者中的表达情况确定免疫检查点抑制剂的疗效:一项真实世界前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Takeshi Masuda, Yukari Tsubata, Kojirou Hata, Mika Horie, Katsuyuki Kiura, Nobuhiro Kanaji, Takuya Inoue, Masahiro Kodani, Masaaki Yanai, Kakuhiro Yamaguchi, Naoko Matsumoto, Masahiro Yamasaki, Nobuhisa Ishikawa, Ken Masuda, Nagio Takigawa, Shoichi Kuyama, Tetsuya Kubota, Kazuya Nishii, Katsuyuki Hotta, Noboru Hattori","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.15469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies have shown the antitumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BM). However, it is unclear whether the efficacy of ICI is similar between patients with and without BM. It is yet unclear whether the efficacy of ICI in patients with BM increases with higher levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, as observed in patients without BM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the outcomes of ICI treatment between patients with and without BM using a cohort containing 1741 prospectively enrolled patients with lung cancer. We investigated whether there were differences in the outcomes of ICI based on PD-L1 expression levels between these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 240 patients with NSCLC with or without BM who were treated with ICI or both chemotherapy and ICI. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) between all patients with or without BM (p = 0.489). However, OS was significantly shorter in patients with BM than in those without in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group (16.5 M vs. 30.6 M, p = 0.003) but not in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% or negative group. BM was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio: [95% confidence interval], 2.045; [1.058-3.953], p = 0.033) in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicated that the outcomes of patients with or without BM treated with ICI were not significantly different. The efficacy of ICI in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% would be lower in patients with BM than in those without.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors according to programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastasis: A real-world prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Masuda, Yukari Tsubata, Kojirou Hata, Mika Horie, Katsuyuki Kiura, Nobuhiro Kanaji, Takuya Inoue, Masahiro Kodani, Masaaki Yanai, Kakuhiro Yamaguchi, Naoko Matsumoto, Masahiro Yamasaki, Nobuhisa Ishikawa, Ken Masuda, Nagio Takigawa, Shoichi Kuyama, Tetsuya Kubota, Kazuya Nishii, Katsuyuki Hotta, Noboru Hattori\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1759-7714.15469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies have shown the antitumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BM). However, it is unclear whether the efficacy of ICI is similar between patients with and without BM. It is yet unclear whether the efficacy of ICI in patients with BM increases with higher levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, as observed in patients without BM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the outcomes of ICI treatment between patients with and without BM using a cohort containing 1741 prospectively enrolled patients with lung cancer. We investigated whether there were differences in the outcomes of ICI based on PD-L1 expression levels between these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 240 patients with NSCLC with or without BM who were treated with ICI or both chemotherapy and ICI. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) between all patients with or without BM (p = 0.489). However, OS was significantly shorter in patients with BM than in those without in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group (16.5 M vs. 30.6 M, p = 0.003) but not in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% or negative group. BM was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio: [95% confidence interval], 2.045; [1.058-3.953], p = 0.033) in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicated that the outcomes of patients with or without BM treated with ICI were not significantly different. The efficacy of ICI in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% would be lower in patients with BM than in those without.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15469\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介研究表明,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)对患有非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和脑转移(BM)的患者具有抗肿瘤疗效。然而,目前尚不清楚免疫检查点抑制剂在有脑转移和无脑转移患者中的疗效是否相似。ICI对脑转移瘤患者的疗效是否会随着程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达水平的升高而增加,这一点在无脑转移瘤患者中是否也能观察到,目前尚不清楚:我们利用一个包含 1741 名前瞻性入组肺癌患者的队列,比较了有 BM 和无 BM 患者的 ICI 治疗效果。我们根据这些患者的 PD-L1 表达水平研究了 ICI 治疗结果是否存在差异:我们招募了240名伴有或不伴有BM的NSCLC患者,他们接受了ICI或化疗和ICI治疗。有或无骨髓瘤的所有患者的总生存期(OS)无明显差异(P = 0.489)。然而,在PD-L1≥50%组中,有BM的患者的OS明显短于无BM的患者(16.5 M vs. 30.6 M,p = 0.003),但在PD-L1≥1%或阴性组中没有明显差异。在PD-L1≥50%组中,BM是OS的独立不良预后因素(危险比:[95%置信区间],2.045;[1.058-3.953],p = 0.033):我们的研究表明,接受 ICI 治疗的骨髓瘤患者与未接受 ICI 治疗的患者的疗效无明显差异。结论:我们的研究表明,PD-L1表达≥50%的患者接受ICI治疗的疗效无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors according to programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastasis: A real-world prospective observational study.

Introduction: Studies have shown the antitumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BM). However, it is unclear whether the efficacy of ICI is similar between patients with and without BM. It is yet unclear whether the efficacy of ICI in patients with BM increases with higher levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, as observed in patients without BM.

Methods: We compared the outcomes of ICI treatment between patients with and without BM using a cohort containing 1741 prospectively enrolled patients with lung cancer. We investigated whether there were differences in the outcomes of ICI based on PD-L1 expression levels between these patients.

Results: We enrolled 240 patients with NSCLC with or without BM who were treated with ICI or both chemotherapy and ICI. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) between all patients with or without BM (p = 0.489). However, OS was significantly shorter in patients with BM than in those without in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group (16.5 M vs. 30.6 M, p = 0.003) but not in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% or negative group. BM was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio: [95% confidence interval], 2.045; [1.058-3.953], p = 0.033) in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group.

Conclusion: Our study indicated that the outcomes of patients with or without BM treated with ICI were not significantly different. The efficacy of ICI in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% would be lower in patients with BM than in those without.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信