2020 年日本健康促进法》修订后的无烟法规对室内公共场所和家庭吸烟及加热烟草制品使用的影响:2018 年至 2021 年国际烟草控制(ITC)日本调查的结果。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kayo Togawa, Geoffrey T Fong, Anne C K Quah, Gang Meng, Steve S Xu, Janine Quimet, Yumiko Mochizuki, Itsuro Yoshimi, Satomi Odani, Takahiro Tabuchi, Kota Katanoda
{"title":"2020 年日本健康促进法》修订后的无烟法规对室内公共场所和家庭吸烟及加热烟草制品使用的影响:2018 年至 2021 年国际烟草控制(ITC)日本调查的结果。","authors":"Kayo Togawa, Geoffrey T Fong, Anne C K Quah, Gang Meng, Steve S Xu, Janine Quimet, Yumiko Mochizuki, Itsuro Yoshimi, Satomi Odani, Takahiro Tabuchi, Kota Katanoda","doi":"10.1136/tc-2024-058697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In April 2020, Japan's revised Health Promotion Act (HPA) banned cigarette smoking and heated tobacco products (HTP) use in indoor public places but exempted small establishments and permitted smoking-designated/HTP-designated rooms. This pre-post study evaluated the effectiveness of the HPA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from waves 1 to 4 (2018-2021) of the International Tobacco Control Japan Surveys among a national cohort of adults who smoke cigarettes, use HTPs and do not use any tobacco products. The sample sizes in the respective surveys were 4615, 4222, 4387 and 4254. Multivariable logistic regression models employing generalised estimating equations estimated the prevalence of observed and self-reported indoor smoking/HTP use in key public venues (restaurants/cafés, bars/pubs and workplaces), smoke-free places, and homes, and smoke-free/HTP aerosol-free home policies (model 1). The models were additionally adjusted for waves 1-4 to estimate the impacts of the HPA (model 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The implementation of the HPA significantly reduced observed indoor smoking in bars/pubs (model 1: 82.2% (pre) to 55.5% (post), model 2: p=0.04) but not in restaurants/cafés (model 1: 53.0%-24.9%, model 2: p=0.15) or workplaces (model 1: 35.3%-30.1%, model 2: p=0.62). Observed indoor HTP use was also common postimplementation (restaurants/cafés: 19.6%, bars/pubs: 53.9%, workplaces: 36.4%). The implementation of the HPA was associated with a significant increase in observed HTP use in smoke-free places (model 1: 26.3%-33.3%, model 2: p=0.001) and a suggestive increase in homes without HTP aerosol-free policies among adults who smoke (model 1: 64.0%-77.0%, model 2: p=0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of the HPA was limited in its effectiveness. Comprehensive regulations with no exemptions are needed in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of revised smoke-free regulations under the 2020 Japan Health Promotion Act on cigarette smoking and heated tobacco product use in indoor public places and homes: findings from 2018 to 2021 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Japan Surveys.\",\"authors\":\"Kayo Togawa, Geoffrey T Fong, Anne C K Quah, Gang Meng, Steve S Xu, Janine Quimet, Yumiko Mochizuki, Itsuro Yoshimi, Satomi Odani, Takahiro Tabuchi, Kota Katanoda\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/tc-2024-058697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In April 2020, Japan's revised Health Promotion Act (HPA) banned cigarette smoking and heated tobacco products (HTP) use in indoor public places but exempted small establishments and permitted smoking-designated/HTP-designated rooms. This pre-post study evaluated the effectiveness of the HPA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from waves 1 to 4 (2018-2021) of the International Tobacco Control Japan Surveys among a national cohort of adults who smoke cigarettes, use HTPs and do not use any tobacco products. The sample sizes in the respective surveys were 4615, 4222, 4387 and 4254. Multivariable logistic regression models employing generalised estimating equations estimated the prevalence of observed and self-reported indoor smoking/HTP use in key public venues (restaurants/cafés, bars/pubs and workplaces), smoke-free places, and homes, and smoke-free/HTP aerosol-free home policies (model 1). The models were additionally adjusted for waves 1-4 to estimate the impacts of the HPA (model 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The implementation of the HPA significantly reduced observed indoor smoking in bars/pubs (model 1: 82.2% (pre) to 55.5% (post), model 2: p=0.04) but not in restaurants/cafés (model 1: 53.0%-24.9%, model 2: p=0.15) or workplaces (model 1: 35.3%-30.1%, model 2: p=0.62). Observed indoor HTP use was also common postimplementation (restaurants/cafés: 19.6%, bars/pubs: 53.9%, workplaces: 36.4%). The implementation of the HPA was associated with a significant increase in observed HTP use in smoke-free places (model 1: 26.3%-33.3%, model 2: p=0.001) and a suggestive increase in homes without HTP aerosol-free policies among adults who smoke (model 1: 64.0%-77.0%, model 2: p=0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of the HPA was limited in its effectiveness. Comprehensive regulations with no exemptions are needed in Japan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058697\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058697","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2020年4月,日本修订了《健康促进法》(HPA),禁止在室内公共场所吸烟和使用加热烟草制品(HTP),但豁免了小型场所,并允许在指定吸烟室/指定加热烟草制品室吸烟。这项前后期研究评估了 HPA 的有效性:数据来自日本国际烟草控制调查的第 1 波至第 4 波(2018-2021 年),调查对象为全国吸烟、使用 HTP 和不使用任何烟草制品的成年人。各次调查的样本量分别为 4615、4222、4387 和 4254。采用广义估计方程建立的多变量逻辑回归模型估算了在主要公共场所(餐馆/咖啡馆、酒吧/俱乐部和工作场所)、无烟场所和家庭中观察到的和自我报告的室内吸烟/使用高温烟雾剂的流行率,以及无烟/无高温烟雾剂家庭政策(模型1)。此外,还对第1-4波的模型进行了调整,以估算HPA的影响(模型2):结果:实施HPA后,酒吧/酒馆的室内吸烟率明显降低(模型1:82.2%(实施前)至55.5%(实施后),模型2:P=0.04),但餐厅/咖啡馆(模型1:53.0%-24.9%,模型2:P=0.15)或工作场所(模型1:35.3%-30.1%,模型2:P=0.62)的室内吸烟率则没有明显降低。观察到的室内 HTP 使用情况在实施后也很普遍(餐厅/咖啡馆:19.6%;酒吧/酒馆:53.9%;工作场所:36.4%)。实施HPA后,在无烟场所观察到的HTP使用率显著增加(模型1:26.3%-33.3%,模型2:p=0.001),在未实施无HTP气溶胶政策的家庭中,吸烟成人中的HTP使用率也有明显增加(模型1:64.0%-77.0%,模型2:p=0.09):HPA的实施效果有限。结论:HPA 的实施效果有限,日本需要全面的无豁免法规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impacts of revised smoke-free regulations under the 2020 Japan Health Promotion Act on cigarette smoking and heated tobacco product use in indoor public places and homes: findings from 2018 to 2021 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Japan Surveys.

Background: In April 2020, Japan's revised Health Promotion Act (HPA) banned cigarette smoking and heated tobacco products (HTP) use in indoor public places but exempted small establishments and permitted smoking-designated/HTP-designated rooms. This pre-post study evaluated the effectiveness of the HPA.

Methods: Data were from waves 1 to 4 (2018-2021) of the International Tobacco Control Japan Surveys among a national cohort of adults who smoke cigarettes, use HTPs and do not use any tobacco products. The sample sizes in the respective surveys were 4615, 4222, 4387 and 4254. Multivariable logistic regression models employing generalised estimating equations estimated the prevalence of observed and self-reported indoor smoking/HTP use in key public venues (restaurants/cafés, bars/pubs and workplaces), smoke-free places, and homes, and smoke-free/HTP aerosol-free home policies (model 1). The models were additionally adjusted for waves 1-4 to estimate the impacts of the HPA (model 2).

Results: The implementation of the HPA significantly reduced observed indoor smoking in bars/pubs (model 1: 82.2% (pre) to 55.5% (post), model 2: p=0.04) but not in restaurants/cafés (model 1: 53.0%-24.9%, model 2: p=0.15) or workplaces (model 1: 35.3%-30.1%, model 2: p=0.62). Observed indoor HTP use was also common postimplementation (restaurants/cafés: 19.6%, bars/pubs: 53.9%, workplaces: 36.4%). The implementation of the HPA was associated with a significant increase in observed HTP use in smoke-free places (model 1: 26.3%-33.3%, model 2: p=0.001) and a suggestive increase in homes without HTP aerosol-free policies among adults who smoke (model 1: 64.0%-77.0%, model 2: p=0.09).

Conclusions: The implementation of the HPA was limited in its effectiveness. Comprehensive regulations with no exemptions are needed in Japan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信