前循环大血管缺血性卒中后的血管内血栓切除术:最新荟萃分析。

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Seraj Makkawi, Jawad I Bukhari, Hassan K Salamatullah, Osama A Alkulli, Abdulrahman E Alghamdi, Asim Bogari, Naif M Aloufi, Mohammed Albadri, Fay N Alnafisi, Saeed Alghamdi
{"title":"前循环大血管缺血性卒中后的血管内血栓切除术:最新荟萃分析。","authors":"Seraj Makkawi, Jawad I Bukhari, Hassan K Salamatullah, Osama A Alkulli, Abdulrahman E Alghamdi, Asim Bogari, Naif M Aloufi, Mohammed Albadri, Fay N Alnafisi, Saeed Alghamdi","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02670-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has emerged as the established standard of care for the treatment of anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (LVO). However, its benefits remain unclear in specific patient populations. Herein, we present an updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at thoroughly assessing the effectiveness and safety of combining EVT with medical treatment (MT) compared with MT alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched to identify relevant articles published until December 30, 2023. The inclusion criteria restricted articles to randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We pooled odds ratios (OR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen RCTs involving 3897 patients were included in the study. EVT plus MT was associated with a significant reduction in disability at 90 days (OR = 1.91, [1.61-2.26]), improved functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) (OR = 2.19 [1.81-2.64]), excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1) (OR = 2.37, [1.45-3.87]), improved independent ambulation (mRS 0-3) (OR = 2.17, [1.75-2.69]), and higher rates of partial/complete recanalization (OR = 2.18, [1.66-2.87] compared with EVT. Efficacy outcomes for both large and small infarct cores were statistically favorable following EVT. Safety outcomes showed comparable rates, except for intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage, which favored MT alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis supports the use of EVT plus MT as the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke patients with LVO of any infarct core size, as it offers substantial improvements in functional outcomes and recanalization. Safety considerations, particularly the risk of hemorrhage, warrant careful patient selection. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing stroke management protocols and enhancing patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"255"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular thrombectomy after anterior circulation large vessel ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Seraj Makkawi, Jawad I Bukhari, Hassan K Salamatullah, Osama A Alkulli, Abdulrahman E Alghamdi, Asim Bogari, Naif M Aloufi, Mohammed Albadri, Fay N Alnafisi, Saeed Alghamdi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-024-02670-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has emerged as the established standard of care for the treatment of anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (LVO). However, its benefits remain unclear in specific patient populations. Herein, we present an updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at thoroughly assessing the effectiveness and safety of combining EVT with medical treatment (MT) compared with MT alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched to identify relevant articles published until December 30, 2023. The inclusion criteria restricted articles to randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We pooled odds ratios (OR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen RCTs involving 3897 patients were included in the study. EVT plus MT was associated with a significant reduction in disability at 90 days (OR = 1.91, [1.61-2.26]), improved functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) (OR = 2.19 [1.81-2.64]), excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1) (OR = 2.37, [1.45-3.87]), improved independent ambulation (mRS 0-3) (OR = 2.17, [1.75-2.69]), and higher rates of partial/complete recanalization (OR = 2.18, [1.66-2.87] compared with EVT. Efficacy outcomes for both large and small infarct cores were statistically favorable following EVT. Safety outcomes showed comparable rates, except for intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage, which favored MT alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis supports the use of EVT plus MT as the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke patients with LVO of any infarct core size, as it offers substantial improvements in functional outcomes and recanalization. Safety considerations, particularly the risk of hemorrhage, warrant careful patient selection. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing stroke management protocols and enhancing patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475204/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02670-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02670-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血管内血栓切除术(EVT)已成为治疗前循环大血管闭塞(LVO)的既定标准。然而,其在特定患者群体中的益处仍不明确。在此,我们提出了一项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析,旨在全面评估 EVT 与药物治疗(MT)相结合与单独使用 MT 相比的有效性和安全性:本系统性综述按照 PRISMA 指南进行。系统检索了MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库,以确定2023年12月30日之前发表的相关文章。纳入标准仅限于随机临床试验(RCT)。我们汇总了几率比(OR)及其各自的 95% 置信区间(CI):研究共纳入了 15 项 RCT,涉及 3897 名患者。EVT加MT与90天后残疾显著减少(OR = 1.91,[1.61-2.26])、功能独立性改善(改良Rankin量表[mRS] 0-2)(OR = 2.19 [1.81-2.64])、卓越的功能结果(mRS 0-1)(OR = 2.37,[1.45-3.87])、独立行走能力改善(mRS 0-3)(OR = 2.17,[1.75-2.69])以及与 EVT 相比更高的部分/完全再通率(OR = 2.18,[1.66-2.87])。EVT治疗后,大面积和小面积梗死核心的疗效在统计学上都很好。安全性结果显示,除脑内出血和蛛网膜下腔出血外,其他几种出血的发生率相当,而单纯MT更有利:这项荟萃分析支持将 EVT 加 MT 作为任何梗死核心大小的 LVO 急性缺血性卒中患者的标准治疗方法,因为它能显著改善功能预后和再通。出于安全考虑,尤其是出血风险,应谨慎选择患者。这些研究结果为优化中风治疗方案和提高患者预后提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endovascular thrombectomy after anterior circulation large vessel ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis.

Background: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has emerged as the established standard of care for the treatment of anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (LVO). However, its benefits remain unclear in specific patient populations. Herein, we present an updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at thoroughly assessing the effectiveness and safety of combining EVT with medical treatment (MT) compared with MT alone.

Methods: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched to identify relevant articles published until December 30, 2023. The inclusion criteria restricted articles to randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We pooled odds ratios (OR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Fifteen RCTs involving 3897 patients were included in the study. EVT plus MT was associated with a significant reduction in disability at 90 days (OR = 1.91, [1.61-2.26]), improved functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) (OR = 2.19 [1.81-2.64]), excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1) (OR = 2.37, [1.45-3.87]), improved independent ambulation (mRS 0-3) (OR = 2.17, [1.75-2.69]), and higher rates of partial/complete recanalization (OR = 2.18, [1.66-2.87] compared with EVT. Efficacy outcomes for both large and small infarct cores were statistically favorable following EVT. Safety outcomes showed comparable rates, except for intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage, which favored MT alone.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the use of EVT plus MT as the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke patients with LVO of any infarct core size, as it offers substantial improvements in functional outcomes and recanalization. Safety considerations, particularly the risk of hemorrhage, warrant careful patient selection. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing stroke management protocols and enhancing patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信