胆囊次全切除术后切除残余胆囊:机构经验。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.028
Alice Zhu, Leo Benedek, Shirley Deng, Melanie Tsang, Lev Bubis, Christopher Habbel, Brittany Greene, Shiva Jayaraman
{"title":"胆囊次全切除术后切除残余胆囊:机构经验。","authors":"Alice Zhu, Leo Benedek, Shirley Deng, Melanie Tsang, Lev Bubis, Christopher Habbel, Brittany Greene, Shiva Jayaraman","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is an acceptable method of preventing bile duct injuries in \"difficult\" gallbladders. However, it is associated with postoperative bile leaks and retained gallstones that may necessitate resection of the gallbladder remnant. This study evaluates the outcomes of patients who underwent completion cholecystectomy for ongoing symptoms or complication after subtotal cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of adults who underwent laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy after previous subtotal cholecystectomy at a single institution from 2009 to 2023. Indications for reoperation were collected and intraoperative findings, operative outcomes, and rates of postoperative morbidity were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 14 years, 46 patients underwent completion cholecystectomy, with 40 (80%) in the last 5 years. Remnant cholecystitis was the most common reason for reoperation in 37 patients (80.4%). Choledocholithiasis was seen in 4 cases (8.7%). Bile leak, gallstone pancreatitis, and abdominal abscess were observed in 8 (17.4%), 4 (8.7%), and 5 (10.8%) patients, respectively. Four patients (8.7%) had intestinal fistulas intraoperatively. Laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy was attempted in all, with 2 (4.4%) converted to open laparotomy. The median operative time was 111 minutes (interquartile range, 83-140 minutes), and the median hospital stay was 1 day (interquartile range, 0-2 days). Minor complications occurred in 5 patients (10.9%), which were managed conservatively. Four patients had major complications requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous intervention. There were no bile duct injuries or reoperations, and 44 (95.6%) patients had complete symptom resolution at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy is feasible and safe but technically challenging. With the increased use of subtotal cholecystectomy, patients presenting with persistent postoperative pain require timely work-up and management of their symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resection of the remnant gallbladder after subtotal cholecystectomy: An institutional experience.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Zhu, Leo Benedek, Shirley Deng, Melanie Tsang, Lev Bubis, Christopher Habbel, Brittany Greene, Shiva Jayaraman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is an acceptable method of preventing bile duct injuries in \\\"difficult\\\" gallbladders. However, it is associated with postoperative bile leaks and retained gallstones that may necessitate resection of the gallbladder remnant. This study evaluates the outcomes of patients who underwent completion cholecystectomy for ongoing symptoms or complication after subtotal cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of adults who underwent laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy after previous subtotal cholecystectomy at a single institution from 2009 to 2023. Indications for reoperation were collected and intraoperative findings, operative outcomes, and rates of postoperative morbidity were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 14 years, 46 patients underwent completion cholecystectomy, with 40 (80%) in the last 5 years. Remnant cholecystitis was the most common reason for reoperation in 37 patients (80.4%). Choledocholithiasis was seen in 4 cases (8.7%). Bile leak, gallstone pancreatitis, and abdominal abscess were observed in 8 (17.4%), 4 (8.7%), and 5 (10.8%) patients, respectively. Four patients (8.7%) had intestinal fistulas intraoperatively. Laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy was attempted in all, with 2 (4.4%) converted to open laparotomy. The median operative time was 111 minutes (interquartile range, 83-140 minutes), and the median hospital stay was 1 day (interquartile range, 0-2 days). Minor complications occurred in 5 patients (10.9%), which were managed conservatively. Four patients had major complications requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous intervention. There were no bile duct injuries or reoperations, and 44 (95.6%) patients had complete symptom resolution at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy is feasible and safe but technically challenging. With the increased use of subtotal cholecystectomy, patients presenting with persistent postoperative pain require timely work-up and management of their symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术是防止 "疑难 "胆囊胆管损伤的一种可接受的方法。然而,它与术后胆漏和胆结石残留有关,可能需要切除胆囊残余。本研究评估了因胆囊次全切除术后持续症状或并发症而接受胆囊完全切除术的患者的治疗效果:我们对 2009 年至 2023 年期间在一家医疗机构接受腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术后接受胆囊全切除术的成人进行了回顾性研究。研究人员收集了再次手术的指征,并对术中发现、手术结果和术后发病率进行了评估:14年间,46名患者接受了完整胆囊切除术,其中40人(80%)是在最近5年内接受的。残余胆囊炎是 37 名患者(80.4%)再次手术的最常见原因。胆总管结石有 4 例(8.7%)。胆漏、胆石性胰腺炎和腹腔脓肿分别出现在 8 例(17.4%)、4 例(8.7%)和 5 例(10.8%)患者身上。术中有四名患者(8.7%)出现肠瘘。所有患者都尝试了腹腔镜胆囊切除术,其中有 2 名患者(4.4%)转为开腹手术。手术时间中位数为111分钟(四分位间范围为83-140分钟),住院时间中位数为1天(四分位间范围为0-2天)。5名患者(10.9%)出现了轻微并发症,均得到了保守治疗。四名患者出现了严重并发症,需要进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影或经皮介入治疗。没有胆管损伤或再次手术,44 名患者(95.6%)在随访时症状完全缓解:结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是可行且安全的,但在技术上具有挑战性。结论:腹腔镜胆囊全切除术可行且安全,但在技术上具有挑战性。随着胆囊次全切除术的使用越来越多,术后出现持续疼痛的患者需要及时检查和处理症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resection of the remnant gallbladder after subtotal cholecystectomy: An institutional experience.

Background: Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is an acceptable method of preventing bile duct injuries in "difficult" gallbladders. However, it is associated with postoperative bile leaks and retained gallstones that may necessitate resection of the gallbladder remnant. This study evaluates the outcomes of patients who underwent completion cholecystectomy for ongoing symptoms or complication after subtotal cholecystectomy.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of adults who underwent laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy after previous subtotal cholecystectomy at a single institution from 2009 to 2023. Indications for reoperation were collected and intraoperative findings, operative outcomes, and rates of postoperative morbidity were evaluated.

Results: Over 14 years, 46 patients underwent completion cholecystectomy, with 40 (80%) in the last 5 years. Remnant cholecystitis was the most common reason for reoperation in 37 patients (80.4%). Choledocholithiasis was seen in 4 cases (8.7%). Bile leak, gallstone pancreatitis, and abdominal abscess were observed in 8 (17.4%), 4 (8.7%), and 5 (10.8%) patients, respectively. Four patients (8.7%) had intestinal fistulas intraoperatively. Laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy was attempted in all, with 2 (4.4%) converted to open laparotomy. The median operative time was 111 minutes (interquartile range, 83-140 minutes), and the median hospital stay was 1 day (interquartile range, 0-2 days). Minor complications occurred in 5 patients (10.9%), which were managed conservatively. Four patients had major complications requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous intervention. There were no bile duct injuries or reoperations, and 44 (95.6%) patients had complete symptom resolution at follow-up.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy is feasible and safe but technically challenging. With the increased use of subtotal cholecystectomy, patients presenting with persistent postoperative pain require timely work-up and management of their symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信