腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗嗜铬细胞瘤时术中血流动力学的不稳定性,未进行术前药物准备与未分泌肿瘤的比较。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.017
Claire Nomine-Criqui, Amélie Delens, Phi-Linh Nguyen-Thi, Florence Bihain, Nicolas Scheyer, Philippe Guerci, Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Laurent Brunaud
{"title":"腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗嗜铬细胞瘤时术中血流动力学的不稳定性,未进行术前药物准备与未分泌肿瘤的比较。","authors":"Claire Nomine-Criqui, Amélie Delens, Phi-Linh Nguyen-Thi, Florence Bihain, Nicolas Scheyer, Philippe Guerci, Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Laurent Brunaud","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Control of hemodynamic features during adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma is recommended to minimize perioperative cardiovascular complications. However, episodes of intraoperative hemodynamic instability have been observed during adrenalectomies with other indications than pheochromocytoma. The objective of this study was to compare the hemodynamic instability score assessed during unilateral adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma without preoperative medical preparation to hemodynamic instability score in nonsecreting tumor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational study with prospective intraoperative hemodynamic data collection (every 20 seconds) and retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 60 consecutive patients (30 pheochromocytomas vs 30 nonsecreting tumors) were included with a median number of data collections during total procedure time of 318 (interquartile range, 257-388). Mean cumulative intraoperative time outside the target blood pressure range expressed as a percentage of total procedure time was 13.3% vs 6.8% for systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg (P = .01) and 2.4% vs 2.8% for mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg (P = ns), respectively. The median hemodynamic instability score during total procedure time was 33 (interquartile range, 27-43) and 20 (interquartile range, 11-26) in the pheochromocytoma and nonsecreting tumor group, respectively (P < .01). Hemodynamic instability score were similar in patients with compared with without long-term antihypertensive treatment in each patient group (P = ns). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.0 ± 1.5 days, and 30-day morbidity rate was 6.6% (4/60) with no significant difference observed between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although intraoperative hemodynamic instability remains greater in the pheochromocytoma group without preoperative medical preparation, both groups have similar hypotensive episodes. These data highlight the need to better understand the role of preoperative medical preparation in pheochromocytoma patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative hemodynamic instability during laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma without preoperative medical preparation compared with nonsecreting tumor.\",\"authors\":\"Claire Nomine-Criqui, Amélie Delens, Phi-Linh Nguyen-Thi, Florence Bihain, Nicolas Scheyer, Philippe Guerci, Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Laurent Brunaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Control of hemodynamic features during adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma is recommended to minimize perioperative cardiovascular complications. However, episodes of intraoperative hemodynamic instability have been observed during adrenalectomies with other indications than pheochromocytoma. The objective of this study was to compare the hemodynamic instability score assessed during unilateral adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma without preoperative medical preparation to hemodynamic instability score in nonsecreting tumor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational study with prospective intraoperative hemodynamic data collection (every 20 seconds) and retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 60 consecutive patients (30 pheochromocytomas vs 30 nonsecreting tumors) were included with a median number of data collections during total procedure time of 318 (interquartile range, 257-388). Mean cumulative intraoperative time outside the target blood pressure range expressed as a percentage of total procedure time was 13.3% vs 6.8% for systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg (P = .01) and 2.4% vs 2.8% for mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg (P = ns), respectively. The median hemodynamic instability score during total procedure time was 33 (interquartile range, 27-43) and 20 (interquartile range, 11-26) in the pheochromocytoma and nonsecreting tumor group, respectively (P < .01). Hemodynamic instability score were similar in patients with compared with without long-term antihypertensive treatment in each patient group (P = ns). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.0 ± 1.5 days, and 30-day morbidity rate was 6.6% (4/60) with no significant difference observed between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although intraoperative hemodynamic instability remains greater in the pheochromocytoma group without preoperative medical preparation, both groups have similar hypotensive episodes. These data highlight the need to better understand the role of preoperative medical preparation in pheochromocytoma patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:建议在嗜铬细胞瘤肾上腺切除术中控制血流动力学特征,以尽量减少围术期心血管并发症。然而,在嗜铬细胞瘤以外的肾上腺切除术中也观察到术中血流动力学不稳定的情况。本研究的目的是将嗜铬细胞瘤单侧肾上腺切除术中未进行术前药物准备的血流动力学不稳定性评分与非分泌性肿瘤的血流动力学不稳定性评分进行比较:这是一项前瞻性术中血流动力学数据收集(每20秒一次)和回顾性分析的观察性研究:在研究期间,共纳入了 60 名连续患者(30 名嗜铬细胞瘤患者 vs 30 名非分泌性肿瘤患者),总手术时间内收集数据的中位数为 318 次(四分位间范围为 257-388 次)。术中超出目标血压范围的平均累计时间占总手术时间的百分比为:收缩压大于 160 mm Hg 时,13.3% 对 6.8%(P = .01);平均动脉压结论时,2.4% 对 2.8%:虽然没有术前医疗准备的嗜铬细胞瘤组术中血流动力学不稳定性更高,但两组的低血压发作情况相似。这些数据突出表明,有必要更好地了解术前医疗准备在嗜铬细胞瘤患者中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraoperative hemodynamic instability during laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma without preoperative medical preparation compared with nonsecreting tumor.

Background: Control of hemodynamic features during adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma is recommended to minimize perioperative cardiovascular complications. However, episodes of intraoperative hemodynamic instability have been observed during adrenalectomies with other indications than pheochromocytoma. The objective of this study was to compare the hemodynamic instability score assessed during unilateral adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma without preoperative medical preparation to hemodynamic instability score in nonsecreting tumor.

Methods: This was an observational study with prospective intraoperative hemodynamic data collection (every 20 seconds) and retrospective analysis.

Results: During the study period, 60 consecutive patients (30 pheochromocytomas vs 30 nonsecreting tumors) were included with a median number of data collections during total procedure time of 318 (interquartile range, 257-388). Mean cumulative intraoperative time outside the target blood pressure range expressed as a percentage of total procedure time was 13.3% vs 6.8% for systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg (P = .01) and 2.4% vs 2.8% for mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg (P = ns), respectively. The median hemodynamic instability score during total procedure time was 33 (interquartile range, 27-43) and 20 (interquartile range, 11-26) in the pheochromocytoma and nonsecreting tumor group, respectively (P < .01). Hemodynamic instability score were similar in patients with compared with without long-term antihypertensive treatment in each patient group (P = ns). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.0 ± 1.5 days, and 30-day morbidity rate was 6.6% (4/60) with no significant difference observed between both groups.

Conclusion: Although intraoperative hemodynamic instability remains greater in the pheochromocytoma group without preoperative medical preparation, both groups have similar hypotensive episodes. These data highlight the need to better understand the role of preoperative medical preparation in pheochromocytoma patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信