Andrea Moreira, Brian Chen, Elizabeth Bailey, William Nelson, Daniel Murariu
{"title":"机器人辅助下深部上腹部穿孔皮瓣切除术的学习曲线分析。","authors":"Andrea Moreira, Brian Chen, Elizabeth Bailey, William Nelson, Daniel Murariu","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the preferred method for autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy, but risks the development of hernia, bulge, and decreased core strength. Robotic harvest of DIEP vessels may limit abdominal wall morbidity through smaller fascial incisions and preservation of motor nerves. This study shows the expected learning curve (LC) for robotic harvest and compares the LC between a general surgeon (GS) and a plastic surgeon (PS). A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients who underwent bilateral robotic DIEP flap harvest from October 2021 to September 2022. We evaluated robotic pedicle dissection time (DT) and compared the times between GS and PS. We calculated LC for each surgeon using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method, <math> <mstyle><mrow><mi>C</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mi>M</mi></mrow> <mo>=</mo> <munderover><mrow><mo>∑</mo></mrow> <mrow><mi>i</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn></mrow> <mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow> </munderover> <mrow><mo>(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mo>-</mo> <munder><mi>μ</mi> <mstyle><mo>-</mo></mstyle> </munder> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </mstyle> </math> . The LC was identified as the peak of the CUSUM graph. Forty-four flap dissections were recorded during the collection period: 27 by the PS and 17 by the GS. There was no significant difference in DT between the GS and the PS (<i>P</i> = 0.366), and both surgeons saw a decrease in DT over time. Using the CUSUM method, we see the peak of the plot at patient 9 for the PS and the peak of the plot at patient 5 for the GS, after which cumulative DT decreased. As robotic harvest of DIEP flaps becomes accepted, plastic surgeons who wish to incorporate it into their practice may achieve proficiency in their DT within 10 flap harvests and a similar DT compared with robotic-trained GSs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"12 10","pages":"e6242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Curve Analysis for Robotic-assisted Harvest of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Moreira, Brian Chen, Elizabeth Bailey, William Nelson, Daniel Murariu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the preferred method for autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy, but risks the development of hernia, bulge, and decreased core strength. Robotic harvest of DIEP vessels may limit abdominal wall morbidity through smaller fascial incisions and preservation of motor nerves. This study shows the expected learning curve (LC) for robotic harvest and compares the LC between a general surgeon (GS) and a plastic surgeon (PS). A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients who underwent bilateral robotic DIEP flap harvest from October 2021 to September 2022. We evaluated robotic pedicle dissection time (DT) and compared the times between GS and PS. We calculated LC for each surgeon using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method, <math> <mstyle><mrow><mi>C</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mi>M</mi></mrow> <mo>=</mo> <munderover><mrow><mo>∑</mo></mrow> <mrow><mi>i</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn></mrow> <mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow> </munderover> <mrow><mo>(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mo>-</mo> <munder><mi>μ</mi> <mstyle><mo>-</mo></mstyle> </munder> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </mstyle> </math> . The LC was identified as the peak of the CUSUM graph. Forty-four flap dissections were recorded during the collection period: 27 by the PS and 17 by the GS. There was no significant difference in DT between the GS and the PS (<i>P</i> = 0.366), and both surgeons saw a decrease in DT over time. Using the CUSUM method, we see the peak of the plot at patient 9 for the PS and the peak of the plot at patient 5 for the GS, after which cumulative DT decreased. As robotic harvest of DIEP flaps becomes accepted, plastic surgeons who wish to incorporate it into their practice may achieve proficiency in their DT within 10 flap harvests and a similar DT compared with robotic-trained GSs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"e6242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469914/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
上腹部深穿孔器(DIEP)皮瓣是乳房切除术后自体乳房重建的首选方法,但存在发生疝、隆起和核心力量下降的风险。机器人采集 DIEP 血管可通过较小的筋膜切口和保留运动神经来限制腹壁发病率。本研究显示了机器人切除术的预期学习曲线(LC),并比较了普通外科医生(GS)和整形外科医生(PS)的学习曲线。我们对2021年10月至2022年9月期间接受双侧机器人DIEP皮瓣采集术的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们评估了机器人蒂解剖时间(DT),并比较了GS和PS的时间。我们使用累积总和(CUSUM)法计算了每位外科医生的LC,即C U S U M = ∑ i = 1 n ( x i - μ - ) 。LC 被识别为 CUSUM 图形的峰值。在数据收集期间,共记录了 44 例皮瓣剥离:PS 27 例,GS 17 例。GS 和 PS 的 DT 没有明显差异(P = 0.366),而且随着时间的推移,两位外科医生的 DT 都有所下降。使用 CUSUM 方法,我们可以看到 PS 在第 9 位患者处达到峰值,GS 在第 5 位患者处达到峰值,之后累积 DT 有所下降。随着DIEP皮瓣的机器人采集逐渐被接受,希望将其纳入实践的整形外科医生可能会在10次皮瓣采集中达到熟练的DT水平,与接受过机器人培训的GS相比,他们的DT水平相似。
Learning Curve Analysis for Robotic-assisted Harvest of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap.
The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the preferred method for autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy, but risks the development of hernia, bulge, and decreased core strength. Robotic harvest of DIEP vessels may limit abdominal wall morbidity through smaller fascial incisions and preservation of motor nerves. This study shows the expected learning curve (LC) for robotic harvest and compares the LC between a general surgeon (GS) and a plastic surgeon (PS). A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients who underwent bilateral robotic DIEP flap harvest from October 2021 to September 2022. We evaluated robotic pedicle dissection time (DT) and compared the times between GS and PS. We calculated LC for each surgeon using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method, . The LC was identified as the peak of the CUSUM graph. Forty-four flap dissections were recorded during the collection period: 27 by the PS and 17 by the GS. There was no significant difference in DT between the GS and the PS (P = 0.366), and both surgeons saw a decrease in DT over time. Using the CUSUM method, we see the peak of the plot at patient 9 for the PS and the peak of the plot at patient 5 for the GS, after which cumulative DT decreased. As robotic harvest of DIEP flaps becomes accepted, plastic surgeons who wish to incorporate it into their practice may achieve proficiency in their DT within 10 flap harvests and a similar DT compared with robotic-trained GSs.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.