腹膜透析中充盈量与转运之间的关系--从工作台到床边。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Carl M Öberg
{"title":"腹膜透析中充盈量与转运之间的关系--从工作台到床边。","authors":"Carl M Öberg","doi":"10.1177/08968608241290019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Larger fill volumes in peritoneal dialysis (PD) typically improve small solute clearance and water removal, and <i>vice versa</i>-but the relationship between intraperitoneal volume and the capacities for solute and water transport in PD has been little studied. Here, it is proposed that this relative relationship is described by a simple ratio (Volume<sub>new</sub>/Volume<sub>old</sub>)<sup>2/3</sup> up to a critical break-point volume, beyond which further volume increase is less beneficial in terms of solute and water removal.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To scrutinize this hypothesis, experiments were conducted in a rat model of PD alongside a retrospective analysis of data from a prior clinical study. Rats underwent PD with either three consecutive fills of 8 + 8 + 8 mL (n = 10) or 12 + 12 + 12 mL (n = 10), with 45-minute dwell time intervals. This approach yielded 60 estimations of water and solute transport, characterized by osmotic conductance to glucose and solute diffusion capacities, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparative analysis of the predictive efficacy of the two models-the simple ratio <i>versus</i> the break-point model-was performed using Monte Carlo cross-validation. The break-point model emerged as a superior predictor for both water and solute transfer, demonstrating its capability to characterize both experimental data from rats and clinical data from patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present analysis indicates that relatively simple calculations can be used to approximate clinical effects on solute and water removal when prescribing a lower or higher fill volume to patients with PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19969,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","volume":" ","pages":"8968608241290019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between fill volume and transport in peritoneal dialysis-from bench to bedside.\",\"authors\":\"Carl M Öberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08968608241290019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Larger fill volumes in peritoneal dialysis (PD) typically improve small solute clearance and water removal, and <i>vice versa</i>-but the relationship between intraperitoneal volume and the capacities for solute and water transport in PD has been little studied. Here, it is proposed that this relative relationship is described by a simple ratio (Volume<sub>new</sub>/Volume<sub>old</sub>)<sup>2/3</sup> up to a critical break-point volume, beyond which further volume increase is less beneficial in terms of solute and water removal.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To scrutinize this hypothesis, experiments were conducted in a rat model of PD alongside a retrospective analysis of data from a prior clinical study. Rats underwent PD with either three consecutive fills of 8 + 8 + 8 mL (n = 10) or 12 + 12 + 12 mL (n = 10), with 45-minute dwell time intervals. This approach yielded 60 estimations of water and solute transport, characterized by osmotic conductance to glucose and solute diffusion capacities, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparative analysis of the predictive efficacy of the two models-the simple ratio <i>versus</i> the break-point model-was performed using Monte Carlo cross-validation. The break-point model emerged as a superior predictor for both water and solute transfer, demonstrating its capability to characterize both experimental data from rats and clinical data from patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present analysis indicates that relatively simple calculations can be used to approximate clinical effects on solute and water removal when prescribing a lower or higher fill volume to patients with PD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8968608241290019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608241290019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608241290019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:腹膜透析(PD)中较大的充盈容量通常可提高小溶质清除率和水清除率,反之亦然,但对腹膜透析中腹腔内容量与溶质和水转运能力之间的关系研究甚少。本文提出,这种相对关系可以用一个简单的比率(Volumenew/Volumeold)2/3来描述,直到一个临界断点体积为止,超过这个断点体积后,进一步增加体积对溶质和水的清除就不那么有利了:为了验证这一假设,我们在大鼠腹膜透析模型中进行了实验,并对之前的临床研究数据进行了回顾性分析。大鼠接受了 8 + 8 + 8 mL(n = 10)或 12 + 12 + 12 mL(n = 10)的连续三次充盈 PD,停留时间间隔为 45 分钟。这种方法可估算出 60 次水和溶质转运,分别以葡萄糖渗透传导能力和溶质扩散能力为特征:结果:使用蒙特卡罗交叉验证法对两种模型(简单比率模型和断点模型)的预测效果进行了比较分析。断点模型在预测水和溶质的转移方面都更胜一筹,证明它既能描述大鼠的实验数据,也能描述患者的临床数据:本分析表明,在为腹膜透析患者开具较低或较高的充盈量处方时,可以使用相对简单的计算方法来近似评估对溶质和水清除的临床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship between fill volume and transport in peritoneal dialysis-from bench to bedside.

Introduction: Larger fill volumes in peritoneal dialysis (PD) typically improve small solute clearance and water removal, and vice versa-but the relationship between intraperitoneal volume and the capacities for solute and water transport in PD has been little studied. Here, it is proposed that this relative relationship is described by a simple ratio (Volumenew/Volumeold)2/3 up to a critical break-point volume, beyond which further volume increase is less beneficial in terms of solute and water removal.

Method: To scrutinize this hypothesis, experiments were conducted in a rat model of PD alongside a retrospective analysis of data from a prior clinical study. Rats underwent PD with either three consecutive fills of 8 + 8 + 8 mL (n = 10) or 12 + 12 + 12 mL (n = 10), with 45-minute dwell time intervals. This approach yielded 60 estimations of water and solute transport, characterized by osmotic conductance to glucose and solute diffusion capacities, respectively.

Results: Comparative analysis of the predictive efficacy of the two models-the simple ratio versus the break-point model-was performed using Monte Carlo cross-validation. The break-point model emerged as a superior predictor for both water and solute transfer, demonstrating its capability to characterize both experimental data from rats and clinical data from patients.

Conclusion: The present analysis indicates that relatively simple calculations can be used to approximate clinical effects on solute and water removal when prescribing a lower or higher fill volume to patients with PD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Peritoneal Dialysis International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peritoneal Dialysis International (PDI) is an international publication dedicated to peritoneal dialysis. PDI welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of peritoneal dialysis from scientists working in the peritoneal dialysis field around the world. Peritoneal Dialysis International is included in Index Medicus and indexed in Current Contents/Clinical Practice, the Science Citation Index, and Excerpta Medica (Nephrology/Urology Core Journal). It is also abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts (CA), as well as being indexed in Embase as a priority journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信