局部麻醉对通过数字高速视频显微镜诊断睫状肌运动障碍的影响。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Lionel Benchimol, Noemie Bricmont, Romane Bonhiver, Grégory A Hans, Philippe Lefebvre, Celine Kempeneers, Anne-Lise Poirrier
{"title":"局部麻醉对通过数字高速视频显微镜诊断睫状肌运动障碍的影响。","authors":"Lionel Benchimol, Noemie Bricmont, Romane Bonhiver, Grégory A Hans, Philippe Lefebvre, Celine Kempeneers, Anne-Lise Poirrier","doi":"10.1002/ppul.27323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This prospective study investigates the impact of local anesthesia on ciliary function in nasal epithelium. The primary objective was to assess whether lidocaine 2% and naphazoline 0.5% nasal spray alter ciliary beat frequency and pattern in subjects undergoing nasal brushing, aiming to enhance primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>It was hypothesized that local anesthesia administration would not significantly affect ciliary function in nasal epithelium.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective, simple-blind randomized study was conducted between 2020 and 2023. The study employed digital high-speed videomicroscopy to analyze ciliary beat frequency and pattern.</p><p><strong>Patient/subject selection: </strong>A cohort of 38 participants was recruited, consisting of 25 healthy volunteers and 13 referred individuals (including seven diagnosed with PCD). Selection criteria ensured the absence of chronic respiratory diseases, recent respiratory tract infections, or regular use of nasal medications.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Participants underwent nasal brushing with administration of lidocaine and naphazoline nasal spray in one nostril and saline in the contralateral nostril. Ciliary beat frequency and pattern were measured using digital high-speed video microscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nasal spray administration did not significantly alter ciliary beat frequency or pattern compared to saline (p = 0.841 and p = 0.125, respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed consistent results across healthy volunteers, referred patients, and PCD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Local anesthesia with lidocaine and naphazoline spray did not affect ciliary function outcomes. These findings support the safe use of these agents in clinical practice for PCD diagnostic procedures. Further research with larger cohorts is warranted for validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of local anesthesia on ciliary dyskinesia diagnosis by digital high-speed videomicroscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Lionel Benchimol, Noemie Bricmont, Romane Bonhiver, Grégory A Hans, Philippe Lefebvre, Celine Kempeneers, Anne-Lise Poirrier\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppul.27323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This prospective study investigates the impact of local anesthesia on ciliary function in nasal epithelium. The primary objective was to assess whether lidocaine 2% and naphazoline 0.5% nasal spray alter ciliary beat frequency and pattern in subjects undergoing nasal brushing, aiming to enhance primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>It was hypothesized that local anesthesia administration would not significantly affect ciliary function in nasal epithelium.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective, simple-blind randomized study was conducted between 2020 and 2023. The study employed digital high-speed videomicroscopy to analyze ciliary beat frequency and pattern.</p><p><strong>Patient/subject selection: </strong>A cohort of 38 participants was recruited, consisting of 25 healthy volunteers and 13 referred individuals (including seven diagnosed with PCD). Selection criteria ensured the absence of chronic respiratory diseases, recent respiratory tract infections, or regular use of nasal medications.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Participants underwent nasal brushing with administration of lidocaine and naphazoline nasal spray in one nostril and saline in the contralateral nostril. Ciliary beat frequency and pattern were measured using digital high-speed video microscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nasal spray administration did not significantly alter ciliary beat frequency or pattern compared to saline (p = 0.841 and p = 0.125, respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed consistent results across healthy volunteers, referred patients, and PCD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Local anesthesia with lidocaine and naphazoline spray did not affect ciliary function outcomes. These findings support the safe use of these agents in clinical practice for PCD diagnostic procedures. Further research with larger cohorts is warranted for validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27323\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项前瞻性研究调查了局部麻醉对鼻腔上皮细胞睫状功能的影响。主要目的是评估 2% 利多卡因和 0.5% 萘甲唑啉鼻腔喷雾剂是否会改变受试者刷鼻时的睫状肌跳动频率和模式,从而加强原发性睫状肌运动障碍(PCD)的诊断:研究设计:研究设计:2020 年至 2023 年期间进行了一项前瞻性、简单盲法随机研究。研究采用数字高速视频显微镜分析纤毛跳动频率和模式:共招募了 38 名参与者,其中包括 25 名健康志愿者和 13 名转诊者(包括 7 名确诊为 PCD 患者)。选择标准是确保没有慢性呼吸道疾病、近期没有呼吸道感染或经常使用鼻腔药物:方法:参与者进行刷鼻,在一个鼻孔喷利多卡因和萘甲唑林鼻喷雾剂,在对侧鼻孔喷生理盐水。使用数字高速视频显微镜测量纤毛跳动频率和模式:结果:与生理盐水相比,鼻腔喷雾剂不会明显改变睫状肌跳动的频率和模式(分别为 p = 0.841 和 p = 0.125)。分组分析显示,健康志愿者、转诊患者和 PCD 患者的结果一致:结论:使用利多卡因和萘甲唑林喷雾剂进行局部麻醉不会影响睫状肌功能。这些研究结果支持在临床实践中安全使用这些药物进行 PCD 诊断程序。有必要在更大的群体中开展进一步研究,以进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of local anesthesia on ciliary dyskinesia diagnosis by digital high-speed videomicroscopy.

This prospective study investigates the impact of local anesthesia on ciliary function in nasal epithelium. The primary objective was to assess whether lidocaine 2% and naphazoline 0.5% nasal spray alter ciliary beat frequency and pattern in subjects undergoing nasal brushing, aiming to enhance primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) diagnosis.

Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that local anesthesia administration would not significantly affect ciliary function in nasal epithelium.

Study design: A prospective, simple-blind randomized study was conducted between 2020 and 2023. The study employed digital high-speed videomicroscopy to analyze ciliary beat frequency and pattern.

Patient/subject selection: A cohort of 38 participants was recruited, consisting of 25 healthy volunteers and 13 referred individuals (including seven diagnosed with PCD). Selection criteria ensured the absence of chronic respiratory diseases, recent respiratory tract infections, or regular use of nasal medications.

Methodology: Participants underwent nasal brushing with administration of lidocaine and naphazoline nasal spray in one nostril and saline in the contralateral nostril. Ciliary beat frequency and pattern were measured using digital high-speed video microscopy.

Results: Nasal spray administration did not significantly alter ciliary beat frequency or pattern compared to saline (p = 0.841 and p = 0.125, respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed consistent results across healthy volunteers, referred patients, and PCD patients.

Conclusion: Local anesthesia with lidocaine and naphazoline spray did not affect ciliary function outcomes. These findings support the safe use of these agents in clinical practice for PCD diagnostic procedures. Further research with larger cohorts is warranted for validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信