比较新生儿出生时的外周肢体和前额生命体征监测。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Suvvi K Narayana Swamy, Simon J Stockwell, Chong Liu, Caroline Henry, Lara Shipley, Carole Ward, Siavash Mirahmadi, Ricardo Correia, Stephen P Morgan, John A Crowe, Don Sharkey, Barrie R Hayes-Gill
{"title":"比较新生儿出生时的外周肢体和前额生命体征监测。","authors":"Suvvi K Narayana Swamy, Simon J Stockwell, Chong Liu, Caroline Henry, Lara Shipley, Carole Ward, Siavash Mirahmadi, Ricardo Correia, Stephen P Morgan, John A Crowe, Don Sharkey, Barrie R Hayes-Gill","doi":"10.1038/s41390-024-03651-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To study the feasibility of measuring heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) on the forehead, during newborn transition at birth, and to compare these measurements with those obtained from the wrist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Vital signs were measured and compared between forehead-mounted reflectance (remittance) photoplethysmography sensor (fhPPG) and a wrist-mounted pulse oximeter sensor (wrPO), from 20 enrolled term newborns born via elective caesarean section, during the first 10 min of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the datasets available (n = 13), the median (IQR) sensor placement times for fhPPG, ECG and wrPO were 129 (70) s, 143 (68) s, and 159 (76) s, respectively, with data recorded for up to 10 min after birth. The success rate (percentage of total possible HR values reported once sited) of fhPPG (median = 100%) was higher compared to wrPO (median = 69%) during the first 6 min of life (P < 0.005). Both devices exhibited good HR agreement with ECG, achieving >95% agreement by 3 (fhPPG) and 4 (wrPO) min. SpO<sub>2</sub> for fhPPG correlated with wrPO (r = 0.88), but there were significant differences in SpO<sub>2</sub> between the two devices between 3 and 8 min (P < 0.005), with less variance observed with fhPPG SpO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the period of newborn transition at birth in healthy term infants, forehead measurement of vital signs was feasible and exhibited greater HR accuracy and higher estimated SpO<sub>2</sub> values compared to wrist-sited pulse oximetry. Further investigation of forehead monitoring based on the potential benefits over peripheral monitoring is warranted.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility of continuously monitoring heart rate and oxygen saturation from an infant's forehead in the delivery room immediately after birth. Significantly higher SpO<sub>2</sub> measurements were observed from the forehead than the wrist during the transition from foetal to newborn life. Continuous monitoring of vital signs from the forehead could become a valuable tool to improve the delivery of optimal care provided for newborns at birth.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing peripheral limb and forehead vital sign monitoring in newborn infants at birth.\",\"authors\":\"Suvvi K Narayana Swamy, Simon J Stockwell, Chong Liu, Caroline Henry, Lara Shipley, Carole Ward, Siavash Mirahmadi, Ricardo Correia, Stephen P Morgan, John A Crowe, Don Sharkey, Barrie R Hayes-Gill\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41390-024-03651-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To study the feasibility of measuring heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) on the forehead, during newborn transition at birth, and to compare these measurements with those obtained from the wrist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Vital signs were measured and compared between forehead-mounted reflectance (remittance) photoplethysmography sensor (fhPPG) and a wrist-mounted pulse oximeter sensor (wrPO), from 20 enrolled term newborns born via elective caesarean section, during the first 10 min of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the datasets available (n = 13), the median (IQR) sensor placement times for fhPPG, ECG and wrPO were 129 (70) s, 143 (68) s, and 159 (76) s, respectively, with data recorded for up to 10 min after birth. The success rate (percentage of total possible HR values reported once sited) of fhPPG (median = 100%) was higher compared to wrPO (median = 69%) during the first 6 min of life (P < 0.005). Both devices exhibited good HR agreement with ECG, achieving >95% agreement by 3 (fhPPG) and 4 (wrPO) min. SpO<sub>2</sub> for fhPPG correlated with wrPO (r = 0.88), but there were significant differences in SpO<sub>2</sub> between the two devices between 3 and 8 min (P < 0.005), with less variance observed with fhPPG SpO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the period of newborn transition at birth in healthy term infants, forehead measurement of vital signs was feasible and exhibited greater HR accuracy and higher estimated SpO<sub>2</sub> values compared to wrist-sited pulse oximetry. Further investigation of forehead monitoring based on the potential benefits over peripheral monitoring is warranted.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility of continuously monitoring heart rate and oxygen saturation from an infant's forehead in the delivery room immediately after birth. Significantly higher SpO<sub>2</sub> measurements were observed from the forehead than the wrist during the transition from foetal to newborn life. Continuous monitoring of vital signs from the forehead could become a valuable tool to improve the delivery of optimal care provided for newborns at birth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03651-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03651-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究新生儿出生过渡期间在前额测量心率(HR)和血氧饱和度(SpO2)的可行性,并将这些测量结果与通过手腕测量的结果进行比较:目的:研究在新生儿出生过渡期间在前额测量心率(HR)和血氧饱和度(SpO2)的可行性,并将这些测量值与从手腕获得的测量值进行比较:方法:对 20 名通过选择性剖腹产手术出生的足月新生儿在出生后 10 分钟内的生命体征进行测量,并将测量结果与安装在前额的反射(汇款)光电血氧仪传感器(fhPPG)和安装在手腕上的脉搏血氧仪传感器(wrPO)进行比较:从现有数据集(n = 13)来看,fhPPG、ECG 和 wrPO 传感器放置时间的中位数(IQR)分别为 129 (70) 秒、143 (68) 秒和 159 (76) 秒,数据记录时间最长为出生后 10 分钟。在出生后最初 6 分钟内,fhPPG(中位数 = 100%)的成功率(一经定位即报告的可能心率值占总心率值的百分比)高于 wrPO(中位数 = 69%)(P 95% 差异为 3 分钟(fhPPG)和 4 分钟(wrPO))。fhPPG 的 SpO2 与 wrPO 相关(r = 0.88),但在 3 到 8 分钟之间,两种设备的 SpO2 存在显著差异(P 2):在健康足月儿出生时的新生儿过渡期,前额测量生命体征是可行的,与腕式脉搏血氧仪相比,前额测量的 HR 准确性更高,估计的 SpO2 值也更高。与外周监测相比,前额监测的潜在优势值得进一步研究:本研究证明了在婴儿出生后立即在产房通过前额连续监测其心率和血氧饱和度的可行性。在从胎儿期到新生儿期的过渡阶段,前额的 SpO2 测量值明显高于手腕。通过前额对生命体征进行连续监测,可成为改善新生儿出生后最佳护理服务的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing peripheral limb and forehead vital sign monitoring in newborn infants at birth.

Background: To study the feasibility of measuring heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) on the forehead, during newborn transition at birth, and to compare these measurements with those obtained from the wrist.

Methods: Vital signs were measured and compared between forehead-mounted reflectance (remittance) photoplethysmography sensor (fhPPG) and a wrist-mounted pulse oximeter sensor (wrPO), from 20 enrolled term newborns born via elective caesarean section, during the first 10 min of life.

Results: From the datasets available (n = 13), the median (IQR) sensor placement times for fhPPG, ECG and wrPO were 129 (70) s, 143 (68) s, and 159 (76) s, respectively, with data recorded for up to 10 min after birth. The success rate (percentage of total possible HR values reported once sited) of fhPPG (median = 100%) was higher compared to wrPO (median = 69%) during the first 6 min of life (P < 0.005). Both devices exhibited good HR agreement with ECG, achieving >95% agreement by 3 (fhPPG) and 4 (wrPO) min. SpO2 for fhPPG correlated with wrPO (r = 0.88), but there were significant differences in SpO2 between the two devices between 3 and 8 min (P < 0.005), with less variance observed with fhPPG SpO2.

Conclusion: In the period of newborn transition at birth in healthy term infants, forehead measurement of vital signs was feasible and exhibited greater HR accuracy and higher estimated SpO2 values compared to wrist-sited pulse oximetry. Further investigation of forehead monitoring based on the potential benefits over peripheral monitoring is warranted.

Impact: This study demonstrates the feasibility of continuously monitoring heart rate and oxygen saturation from an infant's forehead in the delivery room immediately after birth. Significantly higher SpO2 measurements were observed from the forehead than the wrist during the transition from foetal to newborn life. Continuous monitoring of vital signs from the forehead could become a valuable tool to improve the delivery of optimal care provided for newborns at birth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信