{"title":"老年晚期肝细胞癌患者在一线阿特珠单抗加贝伐单抗治疗后病情进展,对伦伐替尼的耐受性较差:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Daisuke Kato, Takanori Suzuki, Kentaro Matsuura, Kohei Okayama, Fumihiro Okumura, Yoshihito Nagura, Satoshi Sobue, Katsumi Hayashi, Atsunori Kusakabe, Izumi Hasegawa, Sho Matoya, Tsutomu Mizoshita, Yoshihide Kimura, Hiromu Kondo, Atsushi Ozasa, Hayato Kawamura, Kei Fujiwara, Shunsuke Nojiri, Hiromi Kataoka","doi":"10.1159/000541455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We investigated the effectiveness of lenvatinib (LEN) after disease progression following first-line treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and ten HCC patients treated with Atez/Bev as first-line systemic chemotherapy were enrolled and underwent dynamic computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging to determine the treatment response. We evaluated the treatment efficacy and prognosis after second-line LEN treatment, especially in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 110 study patients, 88 patients (80%) were determined to have progressive disease (PD) during the observation periods, and 40 patients received second-line LEN therapy. The 40 patients included 13 patients who were unable to continue LEN until the initial evaluation due to adverse events (AE). The 27 patients who were able to continue LEN therapy (Group A) were significantly younger at initiation of Atez/Bev than those who could not continue (71 vs. 77 years old, p = 0.013). Comparing the OS and PFS between Group A and 44 patients that included 13 patients who were unable to continue LEN and 31 patients did not receive the second-line treatment (Group B), the former had significantly better OS than Group B (31.1 vs. 17.8 months, p = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tolerability of second-line LEN therapy was lower in elderly patients, and the OS from the start of Atez/Bev therapy was different depending on the tolerability of second-line LEN therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poor Tolerability of Lenvatinib in Elderly Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Disease Progression following First-Line Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab: A Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Kato, Takanori Suzuki, Kentaro Matsuura, Kohei Okayama, Fumihiro Okumura, Yoshihito Nagura, Satoshi Sobue, Katsumi Hayashi, Atsunori Kusakabe, Izumi Hasegawa, Sho Matoya, Tsutomu Mizoshita, Yoshihide Kimura, Hiromu Kondo, Atsushi Ozasa, Hayato Kawamura, Kei Fujiwara, Shunsuke Nojiri, Hiromi Kataoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We investigated the effectiveness of lenvatinib (LEN) after disease progression following first-line treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and ten HCC patients treated with Atez/Bev as first-line systemic chemotherapy were enrolled and underwent dynamic computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging to determine the treatment response. We evaluated the treatment efficacy and prognosis after second-line LEN treatment, especially in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 110 study patients, 88 patients (80%) were determined to have progressive disease (PD) during the observation periods, and 40 patients received second-line LEN therapy. The 40 patients included 13 patients who were unable to continue LEN until the initial evaluation due to adverse events (AE). The 27 patients who were able to continue LEN therapy (Group A) were significantly younger at initiation of Atez/Bev than those who could not continue (71 vs. 77 years old, p = 0.013). Comparing the OS and PFS between Group A and 44 patients that included 13 patients who were unable to continue LEN and 31 patients did not receive the second-line treatment (Group B), the former had significantly better OS than Group B (31.1 vs. 17.8 months, p = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tolerability of second-line LEN therapy was lower in elderly patients, and the OS from the start of Atez/Bev therapy was different depending on the tolerability of second-line LEN therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541455\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Poor Tolerability of Lenvatinib in Elderly Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Disease Progression following First-Line Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab: A Multicenter Study.
Introduction: We investigated the effectiveness of lenvatinib (LEN) after disease progression following first-line treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methods: One hundred and ten HCC patients treated with Atez/Bev as first-line systemic chemotherapy were enrolled and underwent dynamic computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging to determine the treatment response. We evaluated the treatment efficacy and prognosis after second-line LEN treatment, especially in elderly patients.
Results: Of the 110 study patients, 88 patients (80%) were determined to have progressive disease (PD) during the observation periods, and 40 patients received second-line LEN therapy. The 40 patients included 13 patients who were unable to continue LEN until the initial evaluation due to adverse events (AE). The 27 patients who were able to continue LEN therapy (Group A) were significantly younger at initiation of Atez/Bev than those who could not continue (71 vs. 77 years old, p = 0.013). Comparing the OS and PFS between Group A and 44 patients that included 13 patients who were unable to continue LEN and 31 patients did not receive the second-line treatment (Group B), the former had significantly better OS than Group B (31.1 vs. 17.8 months, p = 0.035).
Conclusions: The tolerability of second-line LEN therapy was lower in elderly patients, and the OS from the start of Atez/Bev therapy was different depending on the tolerability of second-line LEN therapy.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.