伤害自己还是他人?一项关于吸烟者对烟盒插页所含信息的偏好的定性研究。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Vicki Myers, Nurit Guttman, Laura J Rosen
{"title":"伤害自己还是他人?一项关于吸烟者对烟盒插页所含信息的偏好的定性研究。","authors":"Vicki Myers, Nurit Guttman, Laura J Rosen","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tobacco package inserts [TPIs] are a novel channel to transmit smoking cessation messages. Research has shown associations between inserts, intentions to quit and increased self-efficacy. In Israel, TPIs have been legislated, but not yet implemented. This study aimed to learn what kind of messages would appeal to people who smoke, for the purpose of developing effective TPIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with 25 people who smoke or formerly smoked, aged 18-67. An inductive and deductive thematic analysis was conducted to enable a dynamic process coding and identifying themes and categories across interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two main themes identified were: harms of smoking and motivators for quitting. Many participants were averse to information about the harms of smoking but interested in specific information about the harm of smoking to others, particularly children, on comparative risks of different tobacco/nicotine products, and about how to address the challenge of addiction. There was a preference for motivational messages encouraging quitting, including how the body recovers, personal quit stories, practical quit tips, and information on cessation services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adult who smoke were receptive to the idea of TPI, but considered some types of information superfluous. It is important to emphasize harm to others, provide information on quit services, and deliver information that is reliable, specific, and evidence-based regarding quitting, so that it can be encouraging, useful, and practical. The merits of providing information to people who smoke on relative risks of different nicotine and tobacco products should also be considered. The findings provide a basis for developing TPI content.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>A large proportion of adults who smoke are interested in quitting. Pack inserts with positive motivating messages, quitline details, and novel information about risks to people who smoke and particularly to others, should be developed and tested, and subsequently distributed nationally to reach all those who open a cigarette package.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harm to myself or others? A qualitative study of the preferences of people who smoke for messages to be included in cigarette pack inserts.\",\"authors\":\"Vicki Myers, Nurit Guttman, Laura J Rosen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tobacco package inserts [TPIs] are a novel channel to transmit smoking cessation messages. Research has shown associations between inserts, intentions to quit and increased self-efficacy. In Israel, TPIs have been legislated, but not yet implemented. This study aimed to learn what kind of messages would appeal to people who smoke, for the purpose of developing effective TPIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with 25 people who smoke or formerly smoked, aged 18-67. An inductive and deductive thematic analysis was conducted to enable a dynamic process coding and identifying themes and categories across interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two main themes identified were: harms of smoking and motivators for quitting. Many participants were averse to information about the harms of smoking but interested in specific information about the harm of smoking to others, particularly children, on comparative risks of different tobacco/nicotine products, and about how to address the challenge of addiction. There was a preference for motivational messages encouraging quitting, including how the body recovers, personal quit stories, practical quit tips, and information on cessation services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adult who smoke were receptive to the idea of TPI, but considered some types of information superfluous. It is important to emphasize harm to others, provide information on quit services, and deliver information that is reliable, specific, and evidence-based regarding quitting, so that it can be encouraging, useful, and practical. The merits of providing information to people who smoke on relative risks of different nicotine and tobacco products should also be considered. The findings provide a basis for developing TPI content.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>A large proportion of adults who smoke are interested in quitting. Pack inserts with positive motivating messages, quitline details, and novel information about risks to people who smoke and particularly to others, should be developed and tested, and subsequently distributed nationally to reach all those who open a cigarette package.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae249\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae249","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:烟草包装插页是传播戒烟信息的新渠道。研究表明,插页、戒烟意愿和自我效能感的提高之间存在关联。在以色列,烟草包装插页已经立法,但尚未实施。本研究旨在了解什么样的信息会吸引吸烟者,从而制定有效的戒烟信息:对 25 名吸烟或曾经吸烟的人进行了半结构式访谈,他们的年龄在 18-67 岁之间。对访谈进行了归纳和演绎主题分析,以便在整个访谈过程中对主题和类别进行动态编码和识别:确定的两大主题是:吸烟的危害和戒烟的动机。许多参与者不喜欢有关吸烟危害的信息,但对有关吸烟对他人尤其是儿童的危害、不同烟草/尼古丁产品的比较风险以及如何应对成瘾挑战的具体信息感兴趣。他们更喜欢鼓励戒烟的信息,包括身体如何恢复、个人戒烟故事、实用戒烟技巧以及戒烟服务信息:结论:成年吸烟者接受TPI的理念,但认为某些类型的信息是多余的。强调对他人的危害,提供戒烟服务信息,提供可靠、具体、以证据为基础的戒烟信息,这样的信息才具有鼓励性、实用性和有用性,这一点非常重要。此外,还应考虑向吸烟者提供不同尼古丁和烟草制品相对风险信息的好处。研究结果为制定TPI内容提供了依据:很大一部分吸烟成年人对戒烟感兴趣。应开发并测试烟盒插页,其中应包含积极的激励信息、戒烟热线详情,以及有关吸烟者尤其是其他人面临的风险的新信息,随后在全国范围内分发,以覆盖所有打开香烟包装的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harm to myself or others? A qualitative study of the preferences of people who smoke for messages to be included in cigarette pack inserts.

Introduction: Tobacco package inserts [TPIs] are a novel channel to transmit smoking cessation messages. Research has shown associations between inserts, intentions to quit and increased self-efficacy. In Israel, TPIs have been legislated, but not yet implemented. This study aimed to learn what kind of messages would appeal to people who smoke, for the purpose of developing effective TPIs.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 25 people who smoke or formerly smoked, aged 18-67. An inductive and deductive thematic analysis was conducted to enable a dynamic process coding and identifying themes and categories across interviews.

Results: Two main themes identified were: harms of smoking and motivators for quitting. Many participants were averse to information about the harms of smoking but interested in specific information about the harm of smoking to others, particularly children, on comparative risks of different tobacco/nicotine products, and about how to address the challenge of addiction. There was a preference for motivational messages encouraging quitting, including how the body recovers, personal quit stories, practical quit tips, and information on cessation services.

Conclusions: Adult who smoke were receptive to the idea of TPI, but considered some types of information superfluous. It is important to emphasize harm to others, provide information on quit services, and deliver information that is reliable, specific, and evidence-based regarding quitting, so that it can be encouraging, useful, and practical. The merits of providing information to people who smoke on relative risks of different nicotine and tobacco products should also be considered. The findings provide a basis for developing TPI content.

Implications: A large proportion of adults who smoke are interested in quitting. Pack inserts with positive motivating messages, quitline details, and novel information about risks to people who smoke and particularly to others, should be developed and tested, and subsequently distributed nationally to reach all those who open a cigarette package.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信