新颖的神经重症监护后康复诊所:设计、使用和临床医生的观点。

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200364
Julia M Carlson, Galina Gheihman, Kristi Emerson, Haitham S Alabsi, W Taylor Kimberly, Michael J Young, David J Lin
{"title":"新颖的神经重症监护后康复诊所:设计、使用和临床医生的观点。","authors":"Julia M Carlson, Galina Gheihman, Kristi Emerson, Haitham S Alabsi, W Taylor Kimberly, Michael J Young, David J Lin","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Despite increasing interest in post-intensive care unit (ICU) clinical care and management, there have been limited descriptions focused on the post-neurologic (neuro)-ICU population. Here, we describe the design of a post-neuro-ICU Neurorecovery Clinic (NRC) and present data collected regarding the clinic's population, referrals, visits, and clinician satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-institution experience with a NRC designed to provide an infrastructure for post-ICU care to patients recovering from acute neurologic disorders or systemic conditions with neurologic sequelae. The clinic offers 2 visit types with different frequencies: a weekly visit and a monthly multidisciplinary visit. This study assessed clinical utilization and clinician perspectives regarding the clinic. Data on clinic referrals, no-show frequency, visit types, and diagnoses for both weekly and monthly visits were collected. A survey was conducted to assess clinician satisfaction and perspectives. Qualitative thematic analysis was performed to identify major themes among survey free responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a 2-year period, 225 patients were referred from the Massachusetts General Hospital neuro-ICU to the NRC. Of those, 105 (47%) were seen in clinic for at least one visit. The most common reasons for loss to follow-up were no shows (38%) and noncontracted insurance (21%). Twenty percent of visits were in-person (the rest were by telehealth). Forty-eight percent were new patients compared with return visits. The most common diagnoses were other (36%), ischemic stroke (26%), and traumatic brain injury (17%). An additional monthly multidisciplinary clinic has seen 14 patients with one no show. Clinicians found their experience in the NRC valuable. Identified benefits included interdisciplinary collaboration, being a more well-rounded and better clinician, improving effectiveness in managing post-ICU problems, and influencing ICU prognosis. Clinicians' greatest challenge was navigating resource limitations for patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A postneuro-ICU NRC is a feasible model of care delivery for patients after severe acute neurologic disorders. Patients with a broad variety of diagnoses were seen in a 2-year period. Providers valued their clinic time and experiences. Future studies should evaluate whether this model of care improves patients' postneuro-ICU outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"e200364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Post-Neurointensive Care Recovery Clinic: Design, Utilization, and Clinician Perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Julia M Carlson, Galina Gheihman, Kristi Emerson, Haitham S Alabsi, W Taylor Kimberly, Michael J Young, David J Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Despite increasing interest in post-intensive care unit (ICU) clinical care and management, there have been limited descriptions focused on the post-neurologic (neuro)-ICU population. Here, we describe the design of a post-neuro-ICU Neurorecovery Clinic (NRC) and present data collected regarding the clinic's population, referrals, visits, and clinician satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-institution experience with a NRC designed to provide an infrastructure for post-ICU care to patients recovering from acute neurologic disorders or systemic conditions with neurologic sequelae. The clinic offers 2 visit types with different frequencies: a weekly visit and a monthly multidisciplinary visit. This study assessed clinical utilization and clinician perspectives regarding the clinic. Data on clinic referrals, no-show frequency, visit types, and diagnoses for both weekly and monthly visits were collected. A survey was conducted to assess clinician satisfaction and perspectives. Qualitative thematic analysis was performed to identify major themes among survey free responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a 2-year period, 225 patients were referred from the Massachusetts General Hospital neuro-ICU to the NRC. Of those, 105 (47%) were seen in clinic for at least one visit. The most common reasons for loss to follow-up were no shows (38%) and noncontracted insurance (21%). Twenty percent of visits were in-person (the rest were by telehealth). Forty-eight percent were new patients compared with return visits. The most common diagnoses were other (36%), ischemic stroke (26%), and traumatic brain injury (17%). An additional monthly multidisciplinary clinic has seen 14 patients with one no show. Clinicians found their experience in the NRC valuable. Identified benefits included interdisciplinary collaboration, being a more well-rounded and better clinician, improving effectiveness in managing post-ICU problems, and influencing ICU prognosis. Clinicians' greatest challenge was navigating resource limitations for patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A postneuro-ICU NRC is a feasible model of care delivery for patients after severe acute neurologic disorders. Patients with a broad variety of diagnoses were seen in a 2-year period. Providers valued their clinic time and experiences. Future studies should evaluate whether this model of care improves patients' postneuro-ICU outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"e200364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464235/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:尽管人们对重症监护室(ICU)后的临床护理和管理越来越感兴趣,但对神经重症监护室(ICU)后人群的描述却很有限。在此,我们介绍了神经重症监护室(ICU)术后神经康复诊所(NRC)的设计,并展示了收集到的有关诊所服务人群、转诊、就诊和临床医生满意度的数据:这是一个单一机构的神经康复诊所,旨在为急性神经系统疾病或伴有神经系统后遗症的全身性疾病的康复患者提供 ICU 后护理的基础设施。诊所提供两种不同频率的就诊类型:每周一次就诊和每月一次多学科就诊。本研究评估了诊所的临床利用率和临床医生对诊所的看法。研究收集了每周出诊和每月出诊的转诊情况、未出诊频率、出诊类型和诊断数据。还进行了一项调查,以评估临床医生的满意度和观点。进行了定性主题分析,以确定调查自由回答中的主要主题:在两年的时间里,共有 225 名患者从麻省总医院神经重症监护室转诊至 NRC。其中 105 人(47%)至少在诊所就诊过一次。失去随访机会的最常见原因是未露面(38%)和未签约保险(21%)。20% 的就诊是面对面的(其余为远程医疗)。与回访相比,有 48% 是新患者。最常见的诊断是其他(36%)、缺血性中风(26%)和脑外伤(17%)。此外,每月一次的多学科门诊共接诊了 14 名患者,其中一名患者没有前来就诊。临床医生认为他们在 NRC 的经历非常宝贵。他们所发现的益处包括:跨学科合作、成为更全面、更优秀的临床医生、提高处理重症监护室后问题的效率以及影响重症监护室的预后。临床医生面临的最大挑战是为患者解决资源限制问题:讨论:神经重症监护室后 NRC 是为严重急性神经系统疾病患者提供护理服务的可行模式。在两年的时间里,共接诊了各种诊断的患者。医护人员非常珍惜他们的门诊时间和经历。未来的研究应评估这种护理模式是否能改善神经重症监护室术后患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel Post-Neurointensive Care Recovery Clinic: Design, Utilization, and Clinician Perspectives.

Background and objectives: Despite increasing interest in post-intensive care unit (ICU) clinical care and management, there have been limited descriptions focused on the post-neurologic (neuro)-ICU population. Here, we describe the design of a post-neuro-ICU Neurorecovery Clinic (NRC) and present data collected regarding the clinic's population, referrals, visits, and clinician satisfaction.

Methods: This is a single-institution experience with a NRC designed to provide an infrastructure for post-ICU care to patients recovering from acute neurologic disorders or systemic conditions with neurologic sequelae. The clinic offers 2 visit types with different frequencies: a weekly visit and a monthly multidisciplinary visit. This study assessed clinical utilization and clinician perspectives regarding the clinic. Data on clinic referrals, no-show frequency, visit types, and diagnoses for both weekly and monthly visits were collected. A survey was conducted to assess clinician satisfaction and perspectives. Qualitative thematic analysis was performed to identify major themes among survey free responses.

Results: In a 2-year period, 225 patients were referred from the Massachusetts General Hospital neuro-ICU to the NRC. Of those, 105 (47%) were seen in clinic for at least one visit. The most common reasons for loss to follow-up were no shows (38%) and noncontracted insurance (21%). Twenty percent of visits were in-person (the rest were by telehealth). Forty-eight percent were new patients compared with return visits. The most common diagnoses were other (36%), ischemic stroke (26%), and traumatic brain injury (17%). An additional monthly multidisciplinary clinic has seen 14 patients with one no show. Clinicians found their experience in the NRC valuable. Identified benefits included interdisciplinary collaboration, being a more well-rounded and better clinician, improving effectiveness in managing post-ICU problems, and influencing ICU prognosis. Clinicians' greatest challenge was navigating resource limitations for patients.

Discussion: A postneuro-ICU NRC is a feasible model of care delivery for patients after severe acute neurologic disorders. Patients with a broad variety of diagnoses were seen in a 2-year period. Providers valued their clinic time and experiences. Future studies should evaluate whether this model of care improves patients' postneuro-ICU outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信