Giuseppe Loverro, Edoardo DI Naro, Matteo Loverro, Antonio D'Amato, Maria T Loverro, Amerigo Vitagliano, Luca M Schounauer, Gianluca R Damiani
{"title":"卵巢内注射自体血小板-血浆:神话还是现实?","authors":"Giuseppe Loverro, Edoardo DI Naro, Matteo Loverro, Antonio D'Amato, Maria T Loverro, Amerigo Vitagliano, Luca M Schounauer, Gianluca R Damiani","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05480-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) relates to a condition in which the ovary experiences a decline in its typical reproductive capacity. Despite notable advancements in understanding the pathophysiology of reduced ovarian reserve in recent years, significant unresolved challenges remain, particularly concerning the optimal therapeutic approaches for this complex condition. The main aim of this study was to investigate the potential of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in enhancing ovarian follicle numbers by assessing changes in ovarian reserve markers.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted on the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, The Cochrane Library, Science Direct and Web of Science. All the relevant studies published till October 2023 were screened. After removing duplicates, and full-text evaluation, 9 articles were eventually included in the present review.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>The pregnancy rate (PR) among patients with poor ovarian reserve (POR) ranged from 13% to 40%, indicating the potential effectiveness of PRP as a rejuvenating treatment. The live birth rate (LBR) ranged from 13% to 20%, comparable to or not lower than the LBR of a matched healthy population aged between 38 and 42 years. Furthermore, the data presented thus far support the notion that PRP may lead to an average clinical PR of 10% in women affected by premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and perimenopause.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRP can not be regarded as a gamete replacement therapy, but rather as an 'additional' therapeutic tool in the management of women with DOR or POR, as well as in peri-menopausal women. Additional qualitative studies are required to validate the existing evidence, as the literature currently lacks randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this regard.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich-plasma: myth or reality?\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Loverro, Edoardo DI Naro, Matteo Loverro, Antonio D'Amato, Maria T Loverro, Amerigo Vitagliano, Luca M Schounauer, Gianluca R Damiani\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05480-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) relates to a condition in which the ovary experiences a decline in its typical reproductive capacity. Despite notable advancements in understanding the pathophysiology of reduced ovarian reserve in recent years, significant unresolved challenges remain, particularly concerning the optimal therapeutic approaches for this complex condition. The main aim of this study was to investigate the potential of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in enhancing ovarian follicle numbers by assessing changes in ovarian reserve markers.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted on the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, The Cochrane Library, Science Direct and Web of Science. All the relevant studies published till October 2023 were screened. After removing duplicates, and full-text evaluation, 9 articles were eventually included in the present review.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>The pregnancy rate (PR) among patients with poor ovarian reserve (POR) ranged from 13% to 40%, indicating the potential effectiveness of PRP as a rejuvenating treatment. The live birth rate (LBR) ranged from 13% to 20%, comparable to or not lower than the LBR of a matched healthy population aged between 38 and 42 years. Furthermore, the data presented thus far support the notion that PRP may lead to an average clinical PR of 10% in women affected by premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and perimenopause.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRP can not be regarded as a gamete replacement therapy, but rather as an 'additional' therapeutic tool in the management of women with DOR or POR, as well as in peri-menopausal women. Additional qualitative studies are required to validate the existing evidence, as the literature currently lacks randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this regard.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05480-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05480-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)是指卵巢的典型生殖能力下降。尽管近年来人们对卵巢储备功能减退的病理生理学的认识取得了显著进步,但仍存在许多尚未解决的难题,尤其是关于这一复杂病症的最佳治疗方法。本研究的主要目的是通过评估卵巢储备标志物的变化,研究富血小板血浆(PRP)在提高卵巢卵泡数量方面的潜力:在以下数据库中进行了全面的文献检索:证据获取:在以下数据库中进行了全面的文献检索:PubMed/MEDLINE、SCOPUS、The Cochrane Library、Science Direct 和 Web of Science。筛选了截至 2023 年 10 月发表的所有相关研究。在去除重复内容并进行全文评估后,最终有 9 篇文章被纳入本综述:卵巢储备不良(POR)患者的妊娠率(PR)从13%到40%不等,表明PRP作为年轻化治疗的潜在有效性。活产率(LBR)在 13% 至 20% 之间,与年龄在 38 至 42 岁之间的匹配健康人群的活产率相当或不低。此外,迄今为止提供的数据支持了这样一种观点,即 PRP 可使受卵巢早衰(POI)和围绝经期影响的妇女的临床平均活产率达到 10%:结论:PRP 不能被视为配子替代疗法,而是治疗 DOR 或 POR 以及围绝经期妇女的 "附加 "治疗工具。由于目前缺乏这方面的随机对照试验(RCT),因此还需要更多的定性研究来验证现有的证据。
Intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich-plasma: myth or reality?
Introduction: The diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) relates to a condition in which the ovary experiences a decline in its typical reproductive capacity. Despite notable advancements in understanding the pathophysiology of reduced ovarian reserve in recent years, significant unresolved challenges remain, particularly concerning the optimal therapeutic approaches for this complex condition. The main aim of this study was to investigate the potential of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in enhancing ovarian follicle numbers by assessing changes in ovarian reserve markers.
Evidence acquisition: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, The Cochrane Library, Science Direct and Web of Science. All the relevant studies published till October 2023 were screened. After removing duplicates, and full-text evaluation, 9 articles were eventually included in the present review.
Evidence synthesis: The pregnancy rate (PR) among patients with poor ovarian reserve (POR) ranged from 13% to 40%, indicating the potential effectiveness of PRP as a rejuvenating treatment. The live birth rate (LBR) ranged from 13% to 20%, comparable to or not lower than the LBR of a matched healthy population aged between 38 and 42 years. Furthermore, the data presented thus far support the notion that PRP may lead to an average clinical PR of 10% in women affected by premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and perimenopause.
Conclusions: PRP can not be regarded as a gamete replacement therapy, but rather as an 'additional' therapeutic tool in the management of women with DOR or POR, as well as in peri-menopausal women. Additional qualitative studies are required to validate the existing evidence, as the literature currently lacks randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this regard.