Rafael Moreno-Sanchez, Jorge Luis Vargas-Navarro, Joaquín Alberto Padilla-Flores, Diana Xochiquetzal Robledo-Cadena, Juan Carlos Granados-Rivas, Rutt Taba, Anton Terasmaa, Giuseppe Leonardo Auditano, Tuuli Kaambre, Sara Rodríguez-Enríquez
{"title":"实验癌细胞模型的能量代谢行为和对微环境因素的反应与实际人类肿瘤不同","authors":"Rafael Moreno-Sanchez, Jorge Luis Vargas-Navarro, Joaquín Alberto Padilla-Flores, Diana Xochiquetzal Robledo-Cadena, Juan Carlos Granados-Rivas, Rutt Taba, Anton Terasmaa, Giuseppe Leonardo Auditano, Tuuli Kaambre, Sara Rodríguez-Enríquez","doi":"10.2174/0113895575322436240924101642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Analysis of the biochemical differences in the energy metabolism among bi-dimensional (2D) and tri-dimensional (3D) cultured cancer cell models and actual human tumors was undertaken. In 2D cancer cells, the oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) fluxes range is 2.5-19 nmol O2/min/mg cellular protein. Hypoxia drastically decreased OxPhos flux by 2-3 times in 2D models, similar to what occurs in mature multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTS), a representative 3D cancer cell model. However, mitochondrial protein contents and enzyme activities were significantly different between both models. Moreover, glycolytic fluxes were also significantly different between 2D and MCTS. The glycolytic flux range in 2D models is 1-34 nmol lactate/min/mg cellular protein, whereas in MCTS the range of glycolysis fluxes is 60-80 nmol lactate/min/mg cellular. In addition, sensitivity to anticancer canonical and metabolic drugs was greater in MCTS than in 2D. Actual solid human tumor samples show lower (1.6-4.5 times) OxPhos fluxes compared to normoxic 2D cancer cell cultures. These observations indicate that tridimensional organization provides a unique microenvironment affecting tumor physiology, which has not been so far faithfully reproduced by the 2D environment. Thus, the analysis of the resemblances and differences among cancer cell models undertaken in the present study raises caution on the interpretation of results derived from 2D cultured cancer cells when they are extended to clinical settings. It also raises awareness about detecting which biological and environmental factors are missing in 2D and 3D cancer cell models to be able to reproduce the actual human tumor behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":18548,"journal":{"name":"Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy Metabolism Behavior and Response to Microenvironmental Factors of the Experimental Cancer Cell Models Differ From That of Actual Human Tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Moreno-Sanchez, Jorge Luis Vargas-Navarro, Joaquín Alberto Padilla-Flores, Diana Xochiquetzal Robledo-Cadena, Juan Carlos Granados-Rivas, Rutt Taba, Anton Terasmaa, Giuseppe Leonardo Auditano, Tuuli Kaambre, Sara Rodríguez-Enríquez\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0113895575322436240924101642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Analysis of the biochemical differences in the energy metabolism among bi-dimensional (2D) and tri-dimensional (3D) cultured cancer cell models and actual human tumors was undertaken. In 2D cancer cells, the oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) fluxes range is 2.5-19 nmol O2/min/mg cellular protein. Hypoxia drastically decreased OxPhos flux by 2-3 times in 2D models, similar to what occurs in mature multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTS), a representative 3D cancer cell model. However, mitochondrial protein contents and enzyme activities were significantly different between both models. Moreover, glycolytic fluxes were also significantly different between 2D and MCTS. The glycolytic flux range in 2D models is 1-34 nmol lactate/min/mg cellular protein, whereas in MCTS the range of glycolysis fluxes is 60-80 nmol lactate/min/mg cellular. In addition, sensitivity to anticancer canonical and metabolic drugs was greater in MCTS than in 2D. Actual solid human tumor samples show lower (1.6-4.5 times) OxPhos fluxes compared to normoxic 2D cancer cell cultures. These observations indicate that tridimensional organization provides a unique microenvironment affecting tumor physiology, which has not been so far faithfully reproduced by the 2D environment. Thus, the analysis of the resemblances and differences among cancer cell models undertaken in the present study raises caution on the interpretation of results derived from 2D cultured cancer cells when they are extended to clinical settings. It also raises awareness about detecting which biological and environmental factors are missing in 2D and 3D cancer cell models to be able to reproduce the actual human tumor behavior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113895575322436240924101642\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113895575322436240924101642","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Energy Metabolism Behavior and Response to Microenvironmental Factors of the Experimental Cancer Cell Models Differ From That of Actual Human Tumors.
Analysis of the biochemical differences in the energy metabolism among bi-dimensional (2D) and tri-dimensional (3D) cultured cancer cell models and actual human tumors was undertaken. In 2D cancer cells, the oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) fluxes range is 2.5-19 nmol O2/min/mg cellular protein. Hypoxia drastically decreased OxPhos flux by 2-3 times in 2D models, similar to what occurs in mature multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTS), a representative 3D cancer cell model. However, mitochondrial protein contents and enzyme activities were significantly different between both models. Moreover, glycolytic fluxes were also significantly different between 2D and MCTS. The glycolytic flux range in 2D models is 1-34 nmol lactate/min/mg cellular protein, whereas in MCTS the range of glycolysis fluxes is 60-80 nmol lactate/min/mg cellular. In addition, sensitivity to anticancer canonical and metabolic drugs was greater in MCTS than in 2D. Actual solid human tumor samples show lower (1.6-4.5 times) OxPhos fluxes compared to normoxic 2D cancer cell cultures. These observations indicate that tridimensional organization provides a unique microenvironment affecting tumor physiology, which has not been so far faithfully reproduced by the 2D environment. Thus, the analysis of the resemblances and differences among cancer cell models undertaken in the present study raises caution on the interpretation of results derived from 2D cultured cancer cells when they are extended to clinical settings. It also raises awareness about detecting which biological and environmental factors are missing in 2D and 3D cancer cell models to be able to reproduce the actual human tumor behavior.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry is to publish short reviews on the important recent developments in medicinal chemistry and allied disciplines.
Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry covers all areas of medicinal chemistry including developments in rational drug design, synthetic chemistry, bioorganic chemistry, high-throughput screening, combinatorial chemistry, drug targets, and natural product research and structure-activity relationship studies.
Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry is an essential journal for every medicinal and pharmaceutical chemist who wishes to be kept informed and up-to-date with the latest and most important developments.