系统回顾与元分析:针对青少年反社会行为的多系统疗法和功能性家庭疗法》。

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Hugh Hunkin, Catia G Malvaso, Catherine R Chittleborough, Angela Gialamas, Alicia Montgomerie, Kathleen Falster, John Lynch, Rhiannon M Pilkington
{"title":"系统回顾与元分析:针对青少年反社会行为的多系统疗法和功能性家庭疗法》。","authors":"Hugh Hunkin, Catia G Malvaso, Catherine R Chittleborough, Angela Gialamas, Alicia Montgomerie, Kathleen Falster, John Lynch, Rhiannon M Pilkington","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Youth criminal justice systems are under growing pressure to reduce re-offending behavior and to support young people's health and developmental needs. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to synthesise evidence for 2 prominent community-based interventions for delinquent and antisocial behavior, namely, multisystemic therapy (MST) and functional family therapy (FFT).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, and Social Services Abstracts for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies evaluating MST/FFT. Included studies involved participants aged under 18 years; included interventions targeted delinquent/antisocial behavior, but not maltreatment. We estimated effect sizes for 6 primary outcomes, synthesising RCTs comparing MST/FFT to usual care using correlated hierarchical effects meta-analysis. We assessed risk of bias and evidence strength using best-practice tools. Given the additional resources needed to implement MST/FFT, we rated evidence strength against a minimum clinically important difference rather than a null effect. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021279736.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 35 studies for MST (16 RCTs meta-analyzed comprising 4,095 participants, 26% female) and 19 studies for FFT (7 RCTs meta-analyzed comprising 1,471 participants, 22% female). MST had a likely clinically important effect on time in out-of-home care, but no clinically important effects on other primary outcomes (delinquency, new offenses/convictions, placement in out-of-home care, substance use), with low-to-moderate evidence strength. FFT demonstrated possible clinically important effects for the number of new offenses/convictions, time in out-of-home care, and substance use, but evidence strength was low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contrary to reports in some evidence clearinghouses indicating that MST/FFT are supported by the highest level of evidence strength, there is limited evidence that these interventions are superior to usual care in reducing delinquent and antisocial behavior in adolescence. These findings should be viewed in the context of important methodological differences with prior reviews, including the rating of evidence strength against a minimum clinically important difference.</p><p><strong>Study preregistration information: </strong>The effect of Multi-Systemic Therapy and Functional Family Therapy in addressing child and adolescent delinquent and/or antisocial behavior and childhood maltreatment; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/; 279736.</p>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Multisystemic Therapy and Functional Family Therapy Targeting Antisocial Behavior in Adolescence.\",\"authors\":\"Hugh Hunkin, Catia G Malvaso, Catherine R Chittleborough, Angela Gialamas, Alicia Montgomerie, Kathleen Falster, John Lynch, Rhiannon M Pilkington\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Youth criminal justice systems are under growing pressure to reduce re-offending behavior and to support young people's health and developmental needs. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to synthesise evidence for 2 prominent community-based interventions for delinquent and antisocial behavior, namely, multisystemic therapy (MST) and functional family therapy (FFT).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, and Social Services Abstracts for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies evaluating MST/FFT. Included studies involved participants aged under 18 years; included interventions targeted delinquent/antisocial behavior, but not maltreatment. We estimated effect sizes for 6 primary outcomes, synthesising RCTs comparing MST/FFT to usual care using correlated hierarchical effects meta-analysis. We assessed risk of bias and evidence strength using best-practice tools. Given the additional resources needed to implement MST/FFT, we rated evidence strength against a minimum clinically important difference rather than a null effect. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021279736.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 35 studies for MST (16 RCTs meta-analyzed comprising 4,095 participants, 26% female) and 19 studies for FFT (7 RCTs meta-analyzed comprising 1,471 participants, 22% female). MST had a likely clinically important effect on time in out-of-home care, but no clinically important effects on other primary outcomes (delinquency, new offenses/convictions, placement in out-of-home care, substance use), with low-to-moderate evidence strength. FFT demonstrated possible clinically important effects for the number of new offenses/convictions, time in out-of-home care, and substance use, but evidence strength was low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contrary to reports in some evidence clearinghouses indicating that MST/FFT are supported by the highest level of evidence strength, there is limited evidence that these interventions are superior to usual care in reducing delinquent and antisocial behavior in adolescence. These findings should be viewed in the context of important methodological differences with prior reviews, including the rating of evidence strength against a minimum clinically important difference.</p><p><strong>Study preregistration information: </strong>The effect of Multi-Systemic Therapy and Functional Family Therapy in addressing child and adolescent delinquent and/or antisocial behavior and childhood maltreatment; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/; 279736.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.008\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:青少年刑事司法系统面临着越来越大的压力,既要减少重新犯罪行为,又要满足青少年的健康和发展需求。本系统综述和荟萃分析试图综合两种著名的社区干预措施--多系统疗法(MST)和功能性家庭疗法(FFT)--治疗青少年犯罪和反社会行为的证据:我们检索了 Medline、PsycInfo、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Social Services Abstracts,以查找评估 MST/FFT 的随机对照试验 (RCT) 和准实验研究。所纳入的研究涉及 18 岁以下的参与者;所纳入的干预措施以犯罪/反社会行为为目标,但不包括虐待行为。我们估算了 6 项主要结果的效应大小,并使用相关分层效应荟萃分析法对 MST/FFT 与常规护理进行比较的 RCT 进行了综合分析。我们使用最佳实践工具评估了偏倚风险和证据强度。鉴于实施 MST/FFT 需要额外的资源,我们根据最小临床重要性差异而非无效效应来评定证据强度。本研究已在 PROSPERO 注册,注册号为 CRD42021279736:我们纳入了 35 项 MST 研究(16 项经元分析的 RCT,包括 4095 名参与者,26% 为女性)和 19 项 FFT 研究(7 项经元分析的 RCT,包括 1471 名参与者,22% 为女性)。心理创伤疗法对家庭外照料的时间可能有重要的临床影响,但对其他主要结果(犯罪、新犯罪/定罪、家庭外照料安置、药物使用)没有重要的临床影响,证据强度为中低水平。FFT在新犯罪/定罪数量、家庭外照料时间和药物使用方面可能具有重要的临床效果,但证据强度较低:与一些证据交换中心的报告中指出的 MST/FFT 获得最高级别的证据支持相反,有有限的证据表明这些干预措施在减少青少年犯罪和反社会行为方面优于常规护理。在看待这些研究结果时,应考虑到与之前的综述在方法上的重要差异,包括根据最小临床重要性差异对证据强度的评级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Multisystemic Therapy and Functional Family Therapy Targeting Antisocial Behavior in Adolescence.

Objective: Youth criminal justice systems are under growing pressure to reduce re-offending behavior and to support young people's health and developmental needs. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to synthesise evidence for 2 prominent community-based interventions for delinquent and antisocial behavior, namely, multisystemic therapy (MST) and functional family therapy (FFT).

Method: We searched Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, and Social Services Abstracts for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies evaluating MST/FFT. Included studies involved participants aged under 18 years; included interventions targeted delinquent/antisocial behavior, but not maltreatment. We estimated effect sizes for 6 primary outcomes, synthesising RCTs comparing MST/FFT to usual care using correlated hierarchical effects meta-analysis. We assessed risk of bias and evidence strength using best-practice tools. Given the additional resources needed to implement MST/FFT, we rated evidence strength against a minimum clinically important difference rather than a null effect. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021279736.

Results: We included 35 studies for MST (16 RCTs meta-analyzed comprising 4,095 participants, 26% female) and 19 studies for FFT (7 RCTs meta-analyzed comprising 1,471 participants, 22% female). MST had a likely clinically important effect on time in out-of-home care, but no clinically important effects on other primary outcomes (delinquency, new offenses/convictions, placement in out-of-home care, substance use), with low-to-moderate evidence strength. FFT demonstrated possible clinically important effects for the number of new offenses/convictions, time in out-of-home care, and substance use, but evidence strength was low.

Conclusion: Contrary to reports in some evidence clearinghouses indicating that MST/FFT are supported by the highest level of evidence strength, there is limited evidence that these interventions are superior to usual care in reducing delinquent and antisocial behavior in adolescence. These findings should be viewed in the context of important methodological differences with prior reviews, including the rating of evidence strength against a minimum clinically important difference.

Study preregistration information: The effect of Multi-Systemic Therapy and Functional Family Therapy in addressing child and adolescent delinquent and/or antisocial behavior and childhood maltreatment; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/; 279736.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信