为海带呐喊:多酚抑制牛津纳米孔褐藻测序的证据。

IF 2.8 3区 生物学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
William S Pearman, Vanessa Arranz, Jose I Carvajal, Annabel Whibley, Yusmiati Liau, Katherine Johnson, Rachel Gray, Jackson M Treece, Neil J Gemmell, Libby Liggins, Ceridwen I Fraser, Evelyn L Jensen, Nicholas J Green
{"title":"为海带呐喊:多酚抑制牛津纳米孔褐藻测序的证据。","authors":"William S Pearman, Vanessa Arranz, Jose I Carvajal, Annabel Whibley, Yusmiati Liau, Katherine Johnson, Rachel Gray, Jackson M Treece, Neil J Gemmell, Libby Liggins, Ceridwen I Fraser, Evelyn L Jensen, Nicholas J Green","doi":"10.1111/jpy.13513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genomic resources have yielded unprecedented insights into ecological and evolutionary processes, not to mention their importance in economic and conservation management of specific organisms. However, the field of macroalgal genomics is hampered by difficulties in the isolation of suitable DNA. Even when DNA that appears high quality by standard metrics has been isolated, such samples may not perform well during the sequencing process. We here have compared Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing results for three species of macroalgae to those of nonmacroalgal species and determined that when using macroalgal samples, sequencing activity declined rapidly, resulting in reduced sequencing yield. Chemical analysis of macroalgal DNA that would be considered suitable for sequencing revealed that DNA derived from dried macroalgae was enriched for polyphenol-DNA adducts (DNA with large polyphenols chemically attached to it), which may have led to sequencing inhibition. Of note, we observed the strongest evidence of sequencing inhibition and reduced sequence output when using samples dried using silica gel-suggesting that such storage approaches may not be appropriate for samples destined for Oxford Nanopore sequencing. Our findings have wide-ranging implications for the generation of genomic resources from macroalgae and suggest a need to develop new storage methods that are more amenable to Oxford Nanopore sequencing or to use fresh flash-frozen tissue wherever possible for genome sequencing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phycology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cry for kelp: Evidence for polyphenolic inhibition of Oxford Nanopore sequencing of brown algae.\",\"authors\":\"William S Pearman, Vanessa Arranz, Jose I Carvajal, Annabel Whibley, Yusmiati Liau, Katherine Johnson, Rachel Gray, Jackson M Treece, Neil J Gemmell, Libby Liggins, Ceridwen I Fraser, Evelyn L Jensen, Nicholas J Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jpy.13513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Genomic resources have yielded unprecedented insights into ecological and evolutionary processes, not to mention their importance in economic and conservation management of specific organisms. However, the field of macroalgal genomics is hampered by difficulties in the isolation of suitable DNA. Even when DNA that appears high quality by standard metrics has been isolated, such samples may not perform well during the sequencing process. We here have compared Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing results for three species of macroalgae to those of nonmacroalgal species and determined that when using macroalgal samples, sequencing activity declined rapidly, resulting in reduced sequencing yield. Chemical analysis of macroalgal DNA that would be considered suitable for sequencing revealed that DNA derived from dried macroalgae was enriched for polyphenol-DNA adducts (DNA with large polyphenols chemically attached to it), which may have led to sequencing inhibition. Of note, we observed the strongest evidence of sequencing inhibition and reduced sequence output when using samples dried using silica gel-suggesting that such storage approaches may not be appropriate for samples destined for Oxford Nanopore sequencing. Our findings have wide-ranging implications for the generation of genomic resources from macroalgae and suggest a need to develop new storage methods that are more amenable to Oxford Nanopore sequencing or to use fresh flash-frozen tissue wherever possible for genome sequencing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Phycology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Phycology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.13513\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phycology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.13513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因组资源为生态和进化过程提供了前所未有的洞察力,更不用说它们在特定生物的经济和保护管理方面的重要性了。然而,大型藻类基因组学领域却因难以分离到合适的 DNA 而受到阻碍。即使已分离出按标准衡量标准看来质量很高的 DNA,这些样本在测序过程中也可能表现不佳。我们在此比较了牛津纳米孔公司对三种大型藻类和非大型藻类的长读程测序结果,发现使用大型藻类样本时,测序活性迅速下降,导致测序产量降低。对适合测序的大型藻类 DNA 进行化学分析后发现,来自干燥大型藻类的 DNA 富含多酚-DNA 加合物(DNA 上附着大量多酚),这可能导致测序受阻。值得注意的是,在使用硅胶干燥样本时,我们观察到了测序抑制和序列输出减少的最有力证据,这表明这种储存方法可能不适合用于牛津纳米孔测序的样本。我们的发现对大型藻类基因组资源的生成具有广泛的影响,并表明有必要开发更适合牛津纳米孔测序的新存储方法,或尽可能使用新鲜的速冻组织进行基因组测序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A cry for kelp: Evidence for polyphenolic inhibition of Oxford Nanopore sequencing of brown algae.

Genomic resources have yielded unprecedented insights into ecological and evolutionary processes, not to mention their importance in economic and conservation management of specific organisms. However, the field of macroalgal genomics is hampered by difficulties in the isolation of suitable DNA. Even when DNA that appears high quality by standard metrics has been isolated, such samples may not perform well during the sequencing process. We here have compared Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing results for three species of macroalgae to those of nonmacroalgal species and determined that when using macroalgal samples, sequencing activity declined rapidly, resulting in reduced sequencing yield. Chemical analysis of macroalgal DNA that would be considered suitable for sequencing revealed that DNA derived from dried macroalgae was enriched for polyphenol-DNA adducts (DNA with large polyphenols chemically attached to it), which may have led to sequencing inhibition. Of note, we observed the strongest evidence of sequencing inhibition and reduced sequence output when using samples dried using silica gel-suggesting that such storage approaches may not be appropriate for samples destined for Oxford Nanopore sequencing. Our findings have wide-ranging implications for the generation of genomic resources from macroalgae and suggest a need to develop new storage methods that are more amenable to Oxford Nanopore sequencing or to use fresh flash-frozen tissue wherever possible for genome sequencing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Phycology
Journal of Phycology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
69
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Phycology was founded in 1965 by the Phycological Society of America. All aspects of basic and applied research on algae are included to provide a common medium for the ecologist, physiologist, cell biologist, molecular biologist, morphologist, oceanographer, taxonomist, geneticist, and biochemist. The Journal also welcomes research that emphasizes algal interactions with other organisms and the roles of algae as components of natural ecosystems. All aspects of basic and applied research on algae are included to provide a common medium for the ecologist, physiologist, cell biologist, molecular biologist, morphologist, oceanographer, acquaculturist, systematist, geneticist, and biochemist. The Journal also welcomes research that emphasizes algal interactions with other organisms and the roles of algae as components of natural ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信