探索自我报告错误和险情的障碍:沙特阿拉伯放射肿瘤学横断面研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-10-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S481686
Haitham Alahmad, Abdulrhman M Alshahrani, Khaled Alenazi, Mohammad Alarifi, Ahmad Abanomy, Ahmad A Alhulail, Raed A Albathi, Saleh Alzughaibi, Mansour Almanaa
{"title":"探索自我报告错误和险情的障碍:沙特阿拉伯放射肿瘤学横断面研究。","authors":"Haitham Alahmad, Abdulrhman M Alshahrani, Khaled Alenazi, Mohammad Alarifi, Ahmad Abanomy, Ahmad A Alhulail, Raed A Albathi, Saleh Alzughaibi, Mansour Almanaa","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S481686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation therapy utilizes complex technologies to target tumors. Radiation therapy is not immune to human errors. Reporting medical errors and near misses is crucial to improving patient outcomes and ensuring the safety of future patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to measure the attitudes of radiotherapy staff members in Saudi Arabia regarding reporting errors and near misses in radiation therapy practice. It also examined the participants' reporting patterns and behaviors and explored the potential barriers to reporting errors and near misses as perceived by the participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study utilizing an online questionnaire was implemented. A sample of 70 health professionals working in radiation oncology departments in Saudi Arabia, including radiation oncologists, medical physicists, and radiotherapists, were recruited to participate in this study from January to June 2023. The data was analyzed using chi-squared testing to compare different groups, and the Kruskal-Wallis was used to find any statistically significant differences between different groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 70 radiotherapy staff members. Professional roles did not significantly impact participants' decisions to report minor or major errors, with most consistently reporting errors to their supervisors regardless of role. The study revealed that fear of professional sanctions and the potential negative impact on a department's reputation are significant barriers to reporting errors or near misses. However, Only 17% of radiation oncologists did consider departmental sanctions as a barrier. Participants identified communication failure as the most significant source of errors in radiation oncology departments. The study also found a high level of agreement among the participants regarding the responsibility of reporting errors and near misses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study investigated reporting errors and near misses in radiotherapy and considered the factors influencing them. The findings highlight the importance of effective communication and the implementation of an electronic reporting system.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"17 ","pages":"4709-4719"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Barriers in Self-Reporting of Errors and Near Misses: A Cross-Sectional Study on Radiation Oncology in Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Haitham Alahmad, Abdulrhman M Alshahrani, Khaled Alenazi, Mohammad Alarifi, Ahmad Abanomy, Ahmad A Alhulail, Raed A Albathi, Saleh Alzughaibi, Mansour Almanaa\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JMDH.S481686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation therapy utilizes complex technologies to target tumors. Radiation therapy is not immune to human errors. Reporting medical errors and near misses is crucial to improving patient outcomes and ensuring the safety of future patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to measure the attitudes of radiotherapy staff members in Saudi Arabia regarding reporting errors and near misses in radiation therapy practice. It also examined the participants' reporting patterns and behaviors and explored the potential barriers to reporting errors and near misses as perceived by the participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study utilizing an online questionnaire was implemented. A sample of 70 health professionals working in radiation oncology departments in Saudi Arabia, including radiation oncologists, medical physicists, and radiotherapists, were recruited to participate in this study from January to June 2023. The data was analyzed using chi-squared testing to compare different groups, and the Kruskal-Wallis was used to find any statistically significant differences between different groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 70 radiotherapy staff members. Professional roles did not significantly impact participants' decisions to report minor or major errors, with most consistently reporting errors to their supervisors regardless of role. The study revealed that fear of professional sanctions and the potential negative impact on a department's reputation are significant barriers to reporting errors or near misses. However, Only 17% of radiation oncologists did consider departmental sanctions as a barrier. Participants identified communication failure as the most significant source of errors in radiation oncology departments. The study also found a high level of agreement among the participants regarding the responsibility of reporting errors and near misses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study investigated reporting errors and near misses in radiotherapy and considered the factors influencing them. The findings highlight the importance of effective communication and the implementation of an electronic reporting system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"4709-4719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471081/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S481686\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S481686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:放射治疗利用复杂的技术来瞄准肿瘤。放射治疗无法避免人为错误。报告医疗差错和险情对于改善患者的治疗效果和确保未来患者的安全至关重要:本研究旨在衡量沙特阿拉伯放射治疗工作人员对报告放射治疗实践中的错误和险情的态度。研究还考察了参与者的报告模式和行为,并探讨了参与者认为的报告错误和险情的潜在障碍:方法:采用在线问卷进行横断面研究。在 2023 年 1 月至 6 月期间,研究人员招募了 70 名在沙特阿拉伯放射肿瘤科工作的专业医护人员,包括放射肿瘤学家、医学物理学家和放射治疗学家。采用卡方检验对数据进行分析,以比较不同组别,并采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验发现不同组别之间存在的显著统计学差异:研究包括 70 名放射治疗工作人员。职业角色对参与者决定报告小错误还是大错误并无明显影响,大多数参与者无论角色如何,都会坚持向其主管报告错误。研究显示,担心受到专业制裁和对科室声誉的潜在负面影响是报告错误或险情的主要障碍。然而,只有 17% 的放射肿瘤学家认为部门制裁是一个障碍。参与者认为,沟通失败是放射肿瘤科出错的最主要原因。研究还发现,参与者对报告错误和险情的责任达成了高度一致:这项研究调查了放射治疗中的报告错误和险情,并考虑了影响这些错误和险情的因素。研究结果强调了有效沟通和实施电子报告系统的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Barriers in Self-Reporting of Errors and Near Misses: A Cross-Sectional Study on Radiation Oncology in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Radiation therapy utilizes complex technologies to target tumors. Radiation therapy is not immune to human errors. Reporting medical errors and near misses is crucial to improving patient outcomes and ensuring the safety of future patients.

Objective: This study aimed to measure the attitudes of radiotherapy staff members in Saudi Arabia regarding reporting errors and near misses in radiation therapy practice. It also examined the participants' reporting patterns and behaviors and explored the potential barriers to reporting errors and near misses as perceived by the participants.

Methods: A cross-sectional study utilizing an online questionnaire was implemented. A sample of 70 health professionals working in radiation oncology departments in Saudi Arabia, including radiation oncologists, medical physicists, and radiotherapists, were recruited to participate in this study from January to June 2023. The data was analyzed using chi-squared testing to compare different groups, and the Kruskal-Wallis was used to find any statistically significant differences between different groups.

Results: The study included 70 radiotherapy staff members. Professional roles did not significantly impact participants' decisions to report minor or major errors, with most consistently reporting errors to their supervisors regardless of role. The study revealed that fear of professional sanctions and the potential negative impact on a department's reputation are significant barriers to reporting errors or near misses. However, Only 17% of radiation oncologists did consider departmental sanctions as a barrier. Participants identified communication failure as the most significant source of errors in radiation oncology departments. The study also found a high level of agreement among the participants regarding the responsibility of reporting errors and near misses.

Conclusion: The study investigated reporting errors and near misses in radiotherapy and considered the factors influencing them. The findings highlight the importance of effective communication and the implementation of an electronic reporting system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信