临床治疗效果对比分析:肝脏立体定向体放射治疗中的屏气与自由呼吸技术。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Kosuke Morishima, Hideomi Yamashita, Tomoyuki Noyama, Atsuto Katano
{"title":"临床治疗效果对比分析:肝脏立体定向体放射治疗中的屏气与自由呼吸技术。","authors":"Kosuke Morishima, Hideomi Yamashita, Tomoyuki Noyama, Atsuto Katano","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to clarify the safety and efficacy of breath-hold irradiation in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 57 consecutive patients who received SBRT for hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases between 2013 and 2021. Breath-hold irradiation was implemented for patients treated after April 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up period for all patients was 16.4 months (IQR: 7.36-20.9). The 2-year overall survival rate was 64.4% (95% CI: 47.4-77.2), and the local control rate was 84.3% (95% CI: 69.7-92.3) for all patients. The 1-year overall survival was 80.0% (95% CI: 60.8-90.5) versus 82.0% (95% CI: 53.5-93.9) in the free-respiratory (FR) group versus the breath-hold (BH) group, respectively (P = 0.60). The 1-year local control rates were 78.1% (95% CI: 57.5-89.5) in the FR group and 95.7% (95% CI: 72.9-99.4) in the BH group, respectively (P = 0.16). Radiation-induced liver injury, defined by an escalation of ≥2 in Child-Pugh score, was observed in four patients within each group (FR 13% vs. BH 15%). There were no gastrointestinal adverse events of Grade 3 or higher.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Breath-hold irradiation can be safely administered and has demonstrated clinical potential in improving local control. Further research into dose escalation using breath-hold techniques is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of clinical treatment outcomes: Breath-hold vs. free-breathing techniques in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Kosuke Morishima, Hideomi Yamashita, Tomoyuki Noyama, Atsuto Katano\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.13793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to clarify the safety and efficacy of breath-hold irradiation in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 57 consecutive patients who received SBRT for hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases between 2013 and 2021. Breath-hold irradiation was implemented for patients treated after April 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up period for all patients was 16.4 months (IQR: 7.36-20.9). The 2-year overall survival rate was 64.4% (95% CI: 47.4-77.2), and the local control rate was 84.3% (95% CI: 69.7-92.3) for all patients. The 1-year overall survival was 80.0% (95% CI: 60.8-90.5) versus 82.0% (95% CI: 53.5-93.9) in the free-respiratory (FR) group versus the breath-hold (BH) group, respectively (P = 0.60). The 1-year local control rates were 78.1% (95% CI: 57.5-89.5) in the FR group and 95.7% (95% CI: 72.9-99.4) in the BH group, respectively (P = 0.16). Radiation-induced liver injury, defined by an escalation of ≥2 in Child-Pugh score, was observed in four patients within each group (FR 13% vs. BH 15%). There were no gastrointestinal adverse events of Grade 3 or higher.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Breath-hold irradiation can be safely administered and has demonstrated clinical potential in improving local control. Further research into dose escalation using breath-hold techniques is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13793\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言本研究旨在明确屏气照射在肝脏立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)中的安全性和有效性:方法:对2013年至2021年间连续接受SBRT治疗肝细胞癌或肝转移的57例患者进行了回顾性分析。结果:所有患者的中位随访期均为2年:所有患者的中位随访时间为16.4个月(IQR:7.36-20.9)。所有患者的2年总生存率为64.4%(95% CI:47.4-77.2),局部控制率为84.3%(95% CI:69.7-92.3)。自由呼吸(FR)组与屏气(BH)组的1年总生存率分别为80.0%(95% CI:60.8-90.5)和82.0%(95% CI:53.5-93.9)(P = 0.60)。自由呼吸组和屏气组的 1 年局部控制率分别为 78.1%(95% CI:57.5-89.5)和 95.7%(95% CI:72.9-99.4)(P = 0.16)。各组中均有四名患者观察到辐射诱导的肝损伤,定义为 Child-Pugh 评分≥2 分(FR 组 13% 对 BH 组 15%)。没有出现3级或以上的胃肠道不良反应:结论:屏气照射可以安全实施,在改善局部控制方面具有临床潜力。使用屏气技术进行剂量升级的进一步研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of clinical treatment outcomes: Breath-hold vs. free-breathing techniques in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to clarify the safety and efficacy of breath-hold irradiation in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 57 consecutive patients who received SBRT for hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases between 2013 and 2021. Breath-hold irradiation was implemented for patients treated after April 2020.

Results: The median follow-up period for all patients was 16.4 months (IQR: 7.36-20.9). The 2-year overall survival rate was 64.4% (95% CI: 47.4-77.2), and the local control rate was 84.3% (95% CI: 69.7-92.3) for all patients. The 1-year overall survival was 80.0% (95% CI: 60.8-90.5) versus 82.0% (95% CI: 53.5-93.9) in the free-respiratory (FR) group versus the breath-hold (BH) group, respectively (P = 0.60). The 1-year local control rates were 78.1% (95% CI: 57.5-89.5) in the FR group and 95.7% (95% CI: 72.9-99.4) in the BH group, respectively (P = 0.16). Radiation-induced liver injury, defined by an escalation of ≥2 in Child-Pugh score, was observed in four patients within each group (FR 13% vs. BH 15%). There were no gastrointestinal adverse events of Grade 3 or higher.

Conclusion: Breath-hold irradiation can be safely administered and has demonstrated clinical potential in improving local control. Further research into dose escalation using breath-hold techniques is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信