动态对比增强磁共振淋巴管造影用于诊断淋巴管疾病和指导经皮栓塞的单中心经验。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yura Ahn, Hyun Jung Koo, Jooae Choe, Hee Ho Chu, Dong Hyun Yang, Joon-Won Kang, Ji Hoon Shin
{"title":"动态对比增强磁共振淋巴管造影用于诊断淋巴管疾病和指导经皮栓塞的单中心经验。","authors":"Yura Ahn, Hyun Jung Koo, Jooae Choe, Hee Ho Chu, Dong Hyun Yang, Joon-Won Kang, Ji Hoon Shin","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pragmatic role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (DCMRL) needs to be evaluated and compared across distinct lymphatic disorders. We aimed to evaluate the performance of DCMRL for identifying the underlying causes of lymphatic disorders and to define the potential benefit of DCMRL for planning lymphatic interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent DCMRL between August 2017 and July 2022 were included in this retrospective analysis. DCMRL was performed with intranodal injection of a gadolinium-based contrast medium through inguinal lymph nodes under local anesthesia. Technical success of DCMRL and feasibility of percutaneous embolization were assessed based on the lymphatic anatomy visualized by DCMRL. Based on the underlying causes, clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy consecutive patients were included. The indications were traumatic chylothorax (n = 42), traumatic chylous ascites (n = 11), and nontraumatic lymphatic leak (n = 17). The technical success rate of DCMRL was the highest in association with nontraumatic lymphatic disorders (94.1% [16/17]), followed by traumatic chylothorax (92.9% [39/42]) and traumatic chylous ascites (81.8% [9/11]). Thirty-one (47.7%) patients among 65 patients who underwent technically successful DCMRL had feasible anatomy for intervention. Clinical success was achieved in 90.3% (28/31) of patients with feasible anatomy for radiologic intervention, while 62.5% (10/16) of patients with anatomical challenges showed improvement. Most patients with traumatic chylothorax showed improvement (92.9% [39/42]), whereas only 23.5% (4/17) of patients with nontraumatic lymphatic disorders showed clinical improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCMRL can help identify the underlying causes of lymphatic disorders. The performance of DCMRL and clinical outcomes vary based on the underlying cause. The feasibility of lymphatic intervention can be determined using DCMRL, which can help in predicting clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"39 39","pages":"e260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Center Experience With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography for Diagnosing Lymphatic Disorders and Guiding Percutaneous Embolization.\",\"authors\":\"Yura Ahn, Hyun Jung Koo, Jooae Choe, Hee Ho Chu, Dong Hyun Yang, Joon-Won Kang, Ji Hoon Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pragmatic role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (DCMRL) needs to be evaluated and compared across distinct lymphatic disorders. We aimed to evaluate the performance of DCMRL for identifying the underlying causes of lymphatic disorders and to define the potential benefit of DCMRL for planning lymphatic interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent DCMRL between August 2017 and July 2022 were included in this retrospective analysis. DCMRL was performed with intranodal injection of a gadolinium-based contrast medium through inguinal lymph nodes under local anesthesia. Technical success of DCMRL and feasibility of percutaneous embolization were assessed based on the lymphatic anatomy visualized by DCMRL. Based on the underlying causes, clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy consecutive patients were included. The indications were traumatic chylothorax (n = 42), traumatic chylous ascites (n = 11), and nontraumatic lymphatic leak (n = 17). The technical success rate of DCMRL was the highest in association with nontraumatic lymphatic disorders (94.1% [16/17]), followed by traumatic chylothorax (92.9% [39/42]) and traumatic chylous ascites (81.8% [9/11]). Thirty-one (47.7%) patients among 65 patients who underwent technically successful DCMRL had feasible anatomy for intervention. Clinical success was achieved in 90.3% (28/31) of patients with feasible anatomy for radiologic intervention, while 62.5% (10/16) of patients with anatomical challenges showed improvement. Most patients with traumatic chylothorax showed improvement (92.9% [39/42]), whereas only 23.5% (4/17) of patients with nontraumatic lymphatic disorders showed clinical improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCMRL can help identify the underlying causes of lymphatic disorders. The performance of DCMRL and clinical outcomes vary based on the underlying cause. The feasibility of lymphatic intervention can be determined using DCMRL, which can help in predicting clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"39 39\",\"pages\":\"e260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473261/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e260\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:动态对比增强磁共振淋巴管造影术(DCMRL)的实际作用需要评估,并在不同的淋巴管疾病中进行比较。我们旨在评估动态对比增强磁共振淋巴管造影在确定淋巴管疾病潜在病因方面的性能,并确定动态对比增强磁共振淋巴管造影在规划淋巴管干预措施方面的潜在益处:本次回顾性分析纳入了2017年8月至2022年7月期间接受DCMRL的患者。DCMRL是在局部麻醉下通过腹股沟淋巴结在结节内注射钆基造影剂进行的。根据 DCMRL 观察到的淋巴解剖结构,评估了 DCMRL 的技术成功率和经皮栓塞的可行性。根据潜在病因,对临床结果进行评估和比较:结果:共纳入 70 例连续患者。适应症为外伤性乳糜胸(42 例)、外伤性乳糜腹水(11 例)和非外伤性淋巴漏(17 例)。DCMRL 的技术成功率在非创伤性淋巴系统疾病中最高(94.1% [16/17]),其次是创伤性乳糜胸(92.9% [39/42])和创伤性乳糜腹水(81.8% [9/11])。在 65 名接受 DCMRL 技术成功的患者中,有 31 名(47.7%)患者具有可行的介入解剖结构。90.3%(28/31)的患者具有可行的放射介入解剖结构,取得了临床成功,而 62.5%(10/16)的患者在解剖结构上有困难,病情有所改善。大多数外伤性乳糜胸患者的病情有所改善(92.9% [39/42]),而只有 23.5%(4/17)的非外伤性淋巴疾病患者的病情有临床改善:结论:DCMRL 可帮助确定淋巴系统疾病的潜在病因。结论:DCMRL 可帮助确定淋巴功能紊乱的根本原因,DCMRL 的性能和临床结果因根本原因而异。使用 DCMRL 可以确定淋巴干预的可行性,有助于预测临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-Center Experience With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography for Diagnosing Lymphatic Disorders and Guiding Percutaneous Embolization.

Background: The pragmatic role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (DCMRL) needs to be evaluated and compared across distinct lymphatic disorders. We aimed to evaluate the performance of DCMRL for identifying the underlying causes of lymphatic disorders and to define the potential benefit of DCMRL for planning lymphatic interventions.

Methods: Patients who underwent DCMRL between August 2017 and July 2022 were included in this retrospective analysis. DCMRL was performed with intranodal injection of a gadolinium-based contrast medium through inguinal lymph nodes under local anesthesia. Technical success of DCMRL and feasibility of percutaneous embolization were assessed based on the lymphatic anatomy visualized by DCMRL. Based on the underlying causes, clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared.

Results: Seventy consecutive patients were included. The indications were traumatic chylothorax (n = 42), traumatic chylous ascites (n = 11), and nontraumatic lymphatic leak (n = 17). The technical success rate of DCMRL was the highest in association with nontraumatic lymphatic disorders (94.1% [16/17]), followed by traumatic chylothorax (92.9% [39/42]) and traumatic chylous ascites (81.8% [9/11]). Thirty-one (47.7%) patients among 65 patients who underwent technically successful DCMRL had feasible anatomy for intervention. Clinical success was achieved in 90.3% (28/31) of patients with feasible anatomy for radiologic intervention, while 62.5% (10/16) of patients with anatomical challenges showed improvement. Most patients with traumatic chylothorax showed improvement (92.9% [39/42]), whereas only 23.5% (4/17) of patients with nontraumatic lymphatic disorders showed clinical improvement.

Conclusion: DCMRL can help identify the underlying causes of lymphatic disorders. The performance of DCMRL and clinical outcomes vary based on the underlying cause. The feasibility of lymphatic intervention can be determined using DCMRL, which can help in predicting clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信