LTAR 共同试验:通过协调跨站点研究,促进提高农业可持续性。

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of environmental quality Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1002/jeq2.20636
Mark A Liebig, Lori J Abendroth, G Philip Robertson, David Augustine, Elizabeth H Boughton, Gwendolynn Bagley, Dennis L Busch, Pat Clark, Alisa W Coffin, Brent J Dalzell, Curtis J Dell, Ann-Marie Fortuna, Ariel Freidenreich, Philip Heilman, Christina Helseth, David R Huggins, Jane M F Johnson, Makki Khorchani, Kevin King, John L Kovar, Martin A Locke, Steven B Mirsky, Merilynn C Schantz, Marty R Schmer, Maria L Silveira, Douglas R Smith, Kathy J Soder, Sheri Spiegal, Jedediah Stinner, David Toledo, Mark Williams, Jenifer Yost
{"title":"LTAR 共同试验:通过协调跨站点研究,促进提高农业可持续性。","authors":"Mark A Liebig, Lori J Abendroth, G Philip Robertson, David Augustine, Elizabeth H Boughton, Gwendolynn Bagley, Dennis L Busch, Pat Clark, Alisa W Coffin, Brent J Dalzell, Curtis J Dell, Ann-Marie Fortuna, Ariel Freidenreich, Philip Heilman, Christina Helseth, David R Huggins, Jane M F Johnson, Makki Khorchani, Kevin King, John L Kovar, Martin A Locke, Steven B Mirsky, Merilynn C Schantz, Marty R Schmer, Maria L Silveira, Douglas R Smith, Kathy J Soder, Sheri Spiegal, Jedediah Stinner, David Toledo, Mark Williams, Jenifer Yost","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.20636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-term research is essential for guiding the development of agroecosystems to meet escalating production demands in a manner that is environmentally sound and socially acceptable. Research must integrate biophysical and socioeconomic factors to provide geographically scalable knowledge that involves stakeholders across the research-education-extension-policy spectrum. In response to this need, the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network developed a \"Common Experiment,\" which seeks to develop and disseminate multi-region, science-based information to enable implementation of visionary agricultural innovations while simultaneously promoting food security, well-being, environmental quality, and climate adaptation and mitigation. The core design of the Common Experiment contrasts prevailing and alternative/aspirational production systems, with the latter including novel innovations hypothesized to advance sustainable intensification in locally appropriate ways. Treatments in the Common Experiment represent a diversity of production systems under cropland, grazing land, and integrated crop/grazing land management. Where possible, treatments are evaluated at multiple spatial scales (e.g., from plot to enterprise) and are designed to evolve over the course of the experiment with stakeholder input. A common assessment framework guides data collection for the experiment and is complemented by metric-specific protocols and an emerging data management infrastructure. Currently, there are large differences among sites in the application of the experimental framework and degree of stakeholder engagement; differences largely grounded in pragmatic issues related to land access, site expertise, and resource availability. The full potential of the LTAR Common Experiment may be realized with strategic investments in network capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":" ","pages":"787-801"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The LTAR Common Experiment: Facilitating improved agricultural sustainability through coordinated cross-site research.\",\"authors\":\"Mark A Liebig, Lori J Abendroth, G Philip Robertson, David Augustine, Elizabeth H Boughton, Gwendolynn Bagley, Dennis L Busch, Pat Clark, Alisa W Coffin, Brent J Dalzell, Curtis J Dell, Ann-Marie Fortuna, Ariel Freidenreich, Philip Heilman, Christina Helseth, David R Huggins, Jane M F Johnson, Makki Khorchani, Kevin King, John L Kovar, Martin A Locke, Steven B Mirsky, Merilynn C Schantz, Marty R Schmer, Maria L Silveira, Douglas R Smith, Kathy J Soder, Sheri Spiegal, Jedediah Stinner, David Toledo, Mark Williams, Jenifer Yost\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeq2.20636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Long-term research is essential for guiding the development of agroecosystems to meet escalating production demands in a manner that is environmentally sound and socially acceptable. Research must integrate biophysical and socioeconomic factors to provide geographically scalable knowledge that involves stakeholders across the research-education-extension-policy spectrum. In response to this need, the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network developed a \\\"Common Experiment,\\\" which seeks to develop and disseminate multi-region, science-based information to enable implementation of visionary agricultural innovations while simultaneously promoting food security, well-being, environmental quality, and climate adaptation and mitigation. The core design of the Common Experiment contrasts prevailing and alternative/aspirational production systems, with the latter including novel innovations hypothesized to advance sustainable intensification in locally appropriate ways. Treatments in the Common Experiment represent a diversity of production systems under cropland, grazing land, and integrated crop/grazing land management. Where possible, treatments are evaluated at multiple spatial scales (e.g., from plot to enterprise) and are designed to evolve over the course of the experiment with stakeholder input. A common assessment framework guides data collection for the experiment and is complemented by metric-specific protocols and an emerging data management infrastructure. Currently, there are large differences among sites in the application of the experimental framework and degree of stakeholder engagement; differences largely grounded in pragmatic issues related to land access, site expertise, and resource availability. The full potential of the LTAR Common Experiment may be realized with strategic investments in network capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"787-801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20636\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期研究对于指导农业生态系统的发展至关重要,以便以无害环境和社会可接受的方式满足不断增长的生产需求。研究必须综合生物物理和社会经济因素,提供可在地域上扩展的知识,让研究-教育-推广-政策领域的利益相关者都参与进来。为了满足这一需求,长期农业生态系统研究(LTAR)网络开发了一个 "共同实验",旨在开发和传播多区域、以科学为基础的信息,以便实施有远见的农业创新,同时促进粮食安全、福祉、环境质量以及气候适应和减缓。共同试验的核心设计是将现行生产系统与替代/理想生产系统进行对比,后者包括新颖的创新,假定能以适合当地的方式推进可持续集约化。共同试验中的处理代表了耕地、牧场和作物/牧场综合管理下生产系统的多样性。在可能的情况下,在多个空间尺度(如从地块到企业)上对处理方法进行评估,并根据利益相关者的意见在实验过程中不断改进。一个共同的评估框架指导着试验的数据收集工作,并辅以具体的指标协议和新兴的数据管理基础设施。目前,不同地点在实验框架的应用和利益相关者的参与程度方面存在很大差异;这些差异主要源于与土地使用权、地点专业知识和资源可用性相关的实际问题。如果对网络能力进行战略性投资,LTAR 共同实验的潜力就有可能得到充分发挥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The LTAR Common Experiment: Facilitating improved agricultural sustainability through coordinated cross-site research.

The LTAR Common Experiment: Facilitating improved agricultural sustainability through coordinated cross-site research.

Long-term research is essential for guiding the development of agroecosystems to meet escalating production demands in a manner that is environmentally sound and socially acceptable. Research must integrate biophysical and socioeconomic factors to provide geographically scalable knowledge that involves stakeholders across the research-education-extension-policy spectrum. In response to this need, the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network developed a "Common Experiment," which seeks to develop and disseminate multi-region, science-based information to enable implementation of visionary agricultural innovations while simultaneously promoting food security, well-being, environmental quality, and climate adaptation and mitigation. The core design of the Common Experiment contrasts prevailing and alternative/aspirational production systems, with the latter including novel innovations hypothesized to advance sustainable intensification in locally appropriate ways. Treatments in the Common Experiment represent a diversity of production systems under cropland, grazing land, and integrated crop/grazing land management. Where possible, treatments are evaluated at multiple spatial scales (e.g., from plot to enterprise) and are designed to evolve over the course of the experiment with stakeholder input. A common assessment framework guides data collection for the experiment and is complemented by metric-specific protocols and an emerging data management infrastructure. Currently, there are large differences among sites in the application of the experimental framework and degree of stakeholder engagement; differences largely grounded in pragmatic issues related to land access, site expertise, and resource availability. The full potential of the LTAR Common Experiment may be realized with strategic investments in network capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信