扩张型心肌病患者冠状动脉微血管功能障碍与运动能力之间的关系

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Abhishek Dattani, Benjamin A Marrow, Gaurav S Gulsin, Jian L Yeo, Amitha Puranik, Emer M Brady, David Adlam, Anvesha Singh, Mohammedimran M Ansari, Jayanth R Arnold, Hui Xue, Peter Kellman, James S Ware, Gerry P McCann
{"title":"扩张型心肌病患者冠状动脉微血管功能障碍与运动能力之间的关系","authors":"Abhishek Dattani, Benjamin A Marrow, Gaurav S Gulsin, Jian L Yeo, Amitha Puranik, Emer M Brady, David Adlam, Anvesha Singh, Mohammedimran M Ansari, Jayanth R Arnold, Hui Xue, Peter Kellman, James S Ware, Gerry P McCann","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aerobic exercise capacity is an independent predictor of mortality in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), but the central mechanisms contributing to exercise intolerance in DCM are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Characterize coronary microvascular function in DCM and determine if cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) measures are associated with aerobic exercise capacity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective case-control comparison of adults with DCM and matched controls. Adenosine-stress perfusion CMR to assess cardiac structure, function and automated inline myocardial blood flow quantification, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to determine peak VO<sub>2</sub>, were performed. Pre-specified multivariable linear regression, including key clinical and cardiac variables, was undertaken to identify independent associations with peak VO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six patients with DCM (mean age 61 years, 71% male) were propensity-matched to 66 controls (mean age 59 years, 71% male) based on age, sex, body mass index and diabetes. DCM patients had markedly lower peak VO<sub>2</sub> (19.8±5.5 versus 25.2±7.3mL/kg/min; P<0.001). The DCM group had greater left ventricular (LV) volumes, lower systolic function, and had more fibrosis compared to controls. In the DCM group, there was similar rest but lower stress myocardial blood flow (1.53±0.49 versus 2.01±0.60mL/g/min; P<0.001) and lower MPR (2.69±0.84 versus 3.15±0.84; P=0.002). Multivariable linear regression demonstrated that LV ejection fraction, extracellular volume fraction and MPR, were independently associated with percentage predicted peak VO<sub>2</sub> in DCM (R<sup>2</sup>=0.531, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In comparison to controls, DCM patients have lower stress myocardial blood flow and MPR. In DCM, MPR, LV ejection fraction and fibrosis are independently associated with aerobic exercise capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":" ","pages":"101108"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Exercise Capacity in Dilated Cardiomyopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Abhishek Dattani, Benjamin A Marrow, Gaurav S Gulsin, Jian L Yeo, Amitha Puranik, Emer M Brady, David Adlam, Anvesha Singh, Mohammedimran M Ansari, Jayanth R Arnold, Hui Xue, Peter Kellman, James S Ware, Gerry P McCann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aerobic exercise capacity is an independent predictor of mortality in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), but the central mechanisms contributing to exercise intolerance in DCM are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Characterize coronary microvascular function in DCM and determine if cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) measures are associated with aerobic exercise capacity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective case-control comparison of adults with DCM and matched controls. Adenosine-stress perfusion CMR to assess cardiac structure, function and automated inline myocardial blood flow quantification, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to determine peak VO<sub>2</sub>, were performed. Pre-specified multivariable linear regression, including key clinical and cardiac variables, was undertaken to identify independent associations with peak VO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six patients with DCM (mean age 61 years, 71% male) were propensity-matched to 66 controls (mean age 59 years, 71% male) based on age, sex, body mass index and diabetes. DCM patients had markedly lower peak VO<sub>2</sub> (19.8±5.5 versus 25.2±7.3mL/kg/min; P<0.001). The DCM group had greater left ventricular (LV) volumes, lower systolic function, and had more fibrosis compared to controls. In the DCM group, there was similar rest but lower stress myocardial blood flow (1.53±0.49 versus 2.01±0.60mL/g/min; P<0.001) and lower MPR (2.69±0.84 versus 3.15±0.84; P=0.002). Multivariable linear regression demonstrated that LV ejection fraction, extracellular volume fraction and MPR, were independently associated with percentage predicted peak VO<sub>2</sub> in DCM (R<sup>2</sup>=0.531, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In comparison to controls, DCM patients have lower stress myocardial blood flow and MPR. In DCM, MPR, LV ejection fraction and fibrosis are independently associated with aerobic exercise capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101108\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101108","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有氧运动能力是扩张型心肌病(DCM)死亡率的独立预测指标,但导致 DCM 运动不耐受的核心机制尚不清楚:描述 DCM 冠状动脉微血管功能的特征,并确定心血管磁共振(CMR)测量是否与有氧运动能力相关:方法:对成人 DCM 患者和匹配的对照组进行前瞻性病例对照比较。进行了腺苷应激灌注CMR以评估心脏结构、功能和自动在线心肌血流定量,以及心肺运动测试(CPET)以确定峰值VO2。为确定与峰值 VO2 的独立关联,进行了预先指定的多变量线性回归,包括主要的临床和心脏变量:根据年龄、性别、体重指数和糖尿病,66 名 DCM 患者(平均年龄 61 岁,71% 为男性)与 66 名对照组患者(平均年龄 59 岁,71% 为男性)进行了倾向匹配。DCM 患者的峰值 VO2 明显较低(19.8±5.5 对 25.2±7.3mL/kg/min;DCM 中的 P2(R2=0.531,PConclusions:与对照组相比,DCM 患者的应激心肌血流量和 MPR 较低。在 DCM 中,MPR、左心室射血分数和纤维化与有氧运动能力独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Exercise Capacity in Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Background: Aerobic exercise capacity is an independent predictor of mortality in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), but the central mechanisms contributing to exercise intolerance in DCM are unknown.

Objectives: Characterize coronary microvascular function in DCM and determine if cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) measures are associated with aerobic exercise capacity.

Methods: Prospective case-control comparison of adults with DCM and matched controls. Adenosine-stress perfusion CMR to assess cardiac structure, function and automated inline myocardial blood flow quantification, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to determine peak VO2, were performed. Pre-specified multivariable linear regression, including key clinical and cardiac variables, was undertaken to identify independent associations with peak VO2.

Results: Sixty-six patients with DCM (mean age 61 years, 71% male) were propensity-matched to 66 controls (mean age 59 years, 71% male) based on age, sex, body mass index and diabetes. DCM patients had markedly lower peak VO2 (19.8±5.5 versus 25.2±7.3mL/kg/min; P<0.001). The DCM group had greater left ventricular (LV) volumes, lower systolic function, and had more fibrosis compared to controls. In the DCM group, there was similar rest but lower stress myocardial blood flow (1.53±0.49 versus 2.01±0.60mL/g/min; P<0.001) and lower MPR (2.69±0.84 versus 3.15±0.84; P=0.002). Multivariable linear regression demonstrated that LV ejection fraction, extracellular volume fraction and MPR, were independently associated with percentage predicted peak VO2 in DCM (R2=0.531, P<0.001).

Conclusions: In comparison to controls, DCM patients have lower stress myocardial blood flow and MPR. In DCM, MPR, LV ejection fraction and fibrosis are independently associated with aerobic exercise capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system. New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis. Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR. Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信