重大烧伤后老年人的长期身心健康结果:烧伤模型系统调查

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Aaron Hong, Barclay T Stewart, Caitlin Orton, Gretchen J Carrougher, Jeffrey C Schneider, Kyra Solis-Beach, Alyssa Bamer, Karen Kowalske, Samuel Mandell
{"title":"重大烧伤后老年人的长期身心健康结果:烧伤模型系统调查","authors":"Aaron Hong, Barclay T Stewart, Caitlin Orton, Gretchen J Carrougher, Jeffrey C Schneider, Kyra Solis-Beach, Alyssa Bamer, Karen Kowalske, Samuel Mandell","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults are at a higher risk of complications after burn injuries since many physical and mental changes are compounded by increasing age. Few studies have targeted the long-term effects of burns on older adults. Therefore, this study will investigate the long-term physical and mental health outcomes in older adults. 3129 participants from the Burn Model System Database were divided into 3 cohorts based on their age at injury (18-54, 55-64, and 65+). Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores were derived from the 12-item Short Form (SF-12) and the Veterans RAND 12-item (VR-12) health surveys and analyzed to measure recovery at preinjury, discharge, 2-year follow-up, and 5-year follow-up. ANOVA, T-score analysis, and linear mixed-effects models were utilized to assess for significant differences in outcome scores. PCS scores were significantly different between the 18-54 cohort and 65+ cohorts at the preinjury and 2-year time intervals (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively), but not at the 5-year follow up (P=0.28). MCS scores were significantly different between the 18-54 cohort and 65+ cohorts at all time intervals measured (p=0.001, p<0.001, P<0.001, and p=0.005 respectively), though the change in MCS scores over time were not significantly different between age cohorts across time (p=0.088). This supports that patients 65 years and older have a different physical function recovery trajectory when compared to patients under 64 years. These findings underscore the belief that for physical recovery after a burn injury, individualized physical rehabilitation plans will provide the most benefit for patients across all ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long Term Physical and Mental Health Outcomes of Older Adults Following a Major Burn Injury: A Burn Model System Investigation.\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Hong, Barclay T Stewart, Caitlin Orton, Gretchen J Carrougher, Jeffrey C Schneider, Kyra Solis-Beach, Alyssa Bamer, Karen Kowalske, Samuel Mandell\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/irae187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Older adults are at a higher risk of complications after burn injuries since many physical and mental changes are compounded by increasing age. Few studies have targeted the long-term effects of burns on older adults. Therefore, this study will investigate the long-term physical and mental health outcomes in older adults. 3129 participants from the Burn Model System Database were divided into 3 cohorts based on their age at injury (18-54, 55-64, and 65+). Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores were derived from the 12-item Short Form (SF-12) and the Veterans RAND 12-item (VR-12) health surveys and analyzed to measure recovery at preinjury, discharge, 2-year follow-up, and 5-year follow-up. ANOVA, T-score analysis, and linear mixed-effects models were utilized to assess for significant differences in outcome scores. PCS scores were significantly different between the 18-54 cohort and 65+ cohorts at the preinjury and 2-year time intervals (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively), but not at the 5-year follow up (P=0.28). MCS scores were significantly different between the 18-54 cohort and 65+ cohorts at all time intervals measured (p=0.001, p<0.001, P<0.001, and p=0.005 respectively), though the change in MCS scores over time were not significantly different between age cohorts across time (p=0.088). This supports that patients 65 years and older have a different physical function recovery trajectory when compared to patients under 64 years. These findings underscore the belief that for physical recovery after a burn injury, individualized physical rehabilitation plans will provide the most benefit for patients across all ages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae187\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年人烧伤后出现并发症的风险较高,因为随着年龄的增长,许多生理和心理变化都会加剧。很少有研究针对烧伤对老年人的长期影响。因此,本研究将调查老年人的长期身心健康结果。根据受伤时的年龄(18-54 岁、55-64 岁和 65 岁以上),将烧伤模型系统数据库中的 3129 名参与者分为 3 组。从 12 项简表(SF-12)和退伍军人兰德 12 项健康调查(VR-12)中得出身体成分摘要(PCS)和精神成分摘要(MCS)得分,并对其进行分析,以衡量受伤前、出院、2 年随访和 5 年随访时的恢复情况。采用方差分析、T-得分分析和线性混合效应模型来评估结果得分的显著差异。18-54 岁组群和 65 岁以上组群的 PCS 分数在受伤前和 2 年的时间间隔内有明显差异(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long Term Physical and Mental Health Outcomes of Older Adults Following a Major Burn Injury: A Burn Model System Investigation.

Older adults are at a higher risk of complications after burn injuries since many physical and mental changes are compounded by increasing age. Few studies have targeted the long-term effects of burns on older adults. Therefore, this study will investigate the long-term physical and mental health outcomes in older adults. 3129 participants from the Burn Model System Database were divided into 3 cohorts based on their age at injury (18-54, 55-64, and 65+). Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores were derived from the 12-item Short Form (SF-12) and the Veterans RAND 12-item (VR-12) health surveys and analyzed to measure recovery at preinjury, discharge, 2-year follow-up, and 5-year follow-up. ANOVA, T-score analysis, and linear mixed-effects models were utilized to assess for significant differences in outcome scores. PCS scores were significantly different between the 18-54 cohort and 65+ cohorts at the preinjury and 2-year time intervals (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively), but not at the 5-year follow up (P=0.28). MCS scores were significantly different between the 18-54 cohort and 65+ cohorts at all time intervals measured (p=0.001, p<0.001, P<0.001, and p=0.005 respectively), though the change in MCS scores over time were not significantly different between age cohorts across time (p=0.088). This supports that patients 65 years and older have a different physical function recovery trajectory when compared to patients under 64 years. These findings underscore the belief that for physical recovery after a burn injury, individualized physical rehabilitation plans will provide the most benefit for patients across all ages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信