肿瘤患者未使用的冷冻保存精子:超长期随访和分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Roy Bitan, Alon Kedem, Sarit Avraham, Michal Youngster, Gil Yerushalmi, Sarita Kaufman, Ana Umanski, Ariel Hourvitz, Itai Gat
{"title":"肿瘤患者未使用的冷冻保存精子:超长期随访和分析。","authors":"Roy Bitan, Alon Kedem, Sarit Avraham, Michal Youngster, Gil Yerushalmi, Sarita Kaufman, Ana Umanski, Ariel Hourvitz, Itai Gat","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03290-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate factors influencing long-term utilization and disposal patterns of cryopreserved semen straws in oncological patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all men who cryopreserved semen due to cancer between October 1993 and December 2021. To assess non-used cryopreserved sperm straws, we investigated the following parameters: cryopreserved semen and usage for fertility treatments versus disposal, summarized by total non-used cases. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to describe last usage and disposal requests over a 15-year analysis. A Log-rank test was applied to compare between age and paternal status categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort consisted of 445 patients. Of these, 55 patients utilized thawed semen for fertility treatments, and 65 opted for disposals, leaving 325 patients who neither used nor disposed of their cryopreserved straws. Our findings revealed a distinct pattern based on age, with the youngest age group (< 25 years) exhibiting significantly lower utilization and disposal rates compared to older patient groups. Additionally, men without children exhibited significantly fewer disposal requests compared to fathers. The median cryopreserved straws were 10 (interquartile range, 6 to 17), while the median used straws were only 2 (interquartile range, 2 to 6).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study brings attention to the additional and needless burden of preservation from both patient and preserved straw perspectives. Implementing a policy based on a cost-effective approach, incorporating time and straw limits, and considering demographic characteristics, could enhance efficiency and necessitate patient consent before preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-used cryopreserved sperm among oncological patients: extra-long-term follow-up and analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Roy Bitan, Alon Kedem, Sarit Avraham, Michal Youngster, Gil Yerushalmi, Sarita Kaufman, Ana Umanski, Ariel Hourvitz, Itai Gat\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10815-024-03290-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate factors influencing long-term utilization and disposal patterns of cryopreserved semen straws in oncological patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all men who cryopreserved semen due to cancer between October 1993 and December 2021. To assess non-used cryopreserved sperm straws, we investigated the following parameters: cryopreserved semen and usage for fertility treatments versus disposal, summarized by total non-used cases. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to describe last usage and disposal requests over a 15-year analysis. A Log-rank test was applied to compare between age and paternal status categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort consisted of 445 patients. Of these, 55 patients utilized thawed semen for fertility treatments, and 65 opted for disposals, leaving 325 patients who neither used nor disposed of their cryopreserved straws. Our findings revealed a distinct pattern based on age, with the youngest age group (< 25 years) exhibiting significantly lower utilization and disposal rates compared to older patient groups. Additionally, men without children exhibited significantly fewer disposal requests compared to fathers. The median cryopreserved straws were 10 (interquartile range, 6 to 17), while the median used straws were only 2 (interquartile range, 2 to 6).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study brings attention to the additional and needless burden of preservation from both patient and preserved straw perspectives. Implementing a policy based on a cost-effective approach, incorporating time and straw limits, and considering demographic characteristics, could enhance efficiency and necessitate patient consent before preservation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03290-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03290-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查影响肿瘤患者长期使用和处理冷冻精液吸管模式的因素:这项回顾性研究纳入了 1993 年 10 月至 2021 年 12 月期间因癌症而冷冻保存精液的所有男性。为了评估未使用的冷冻保存精液吸管,我们调查了以下参数:冷冻保存精液和用于生育治疗与处置,按未使用病例总数汇总。我们采用卡普兰-梅耶尔曲线来描述 15 年间最后一次使用和处理申请的情况。采用对数秩检验对年龄和父亲身份类别进行比较:结果:研究组共有 445 名患者。其中,55 名患者将解冻精液用于生育治疗,65 名患者选择了处理,剩下的 325 名患者既未使用也未处理冷冻保存的精液。我们的研究结果揭示了一种基于年龄的独特模式,其中最年轻的年龄组(讨论.A)使用的精液数量最多,而最年轻的年龄组(讨论.B)则没有使用:我们的研究使人们注意到,从患者和被保存吸管的角度来看,保存吸管都会带来不必要的额外负担。实施一项基于成本效益方法的政策,纳入时间和吸管限制,并考虑人口特征,可以提高效率,并在保存前征得患者同意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-used cryopreserved sperm among oncological patients: extra-long-term follow-up and analysis.

Purpose: To investigate factors influencing long-term utilization and disposal patterns of cryopreserved semen straws in oncological patients.

Methods: This retrospective study included all men who cryopreserved semen due to cancer between October 1993 and December 2021. To assess non-used cryopreserved sperm straws, we investigated the following parameters: cryopreserved semen and usage for fertility treatments versus disposal, summarized by total non-used cases. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to describe last usage and disposal requests over a 15-year analysis. A Log-rank test was applied to compare between age and paternal status categories.

Results: The cohort consisted of 445 patients. Of these, 55 patients utilized thawed semen for fertility treatments, and 65 opted for disposals, leaving 325 patients who neither used nor disposed of their cryopreserved straws. Our findings revealed a distinct pattern based on age, with the youngest age group (< 25 years) exhibiting significantly lower utilization and disposal rates compared to older patient groups. Additionally, men without children exhibited significantly fewer disposal requests compared to fathers. The median cryopreserved straws were 10 (interquartile range, 6 to 17), while the median used straws were only 2 (interquartile range, 2 to 6).

Discussion: Our study brings attention to the additional and needless burden of preservation from both patient and preserved straw perspectives. Implementing a policy based on a cost-effective approach, incorporating time and straw limits, and considering demographic characteristics, could enhance efficiency and necessitate patient consent before preservation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信