辅助卡哌嗪治疗重度抑郁障碍:所需治疗人数、所需伤害人数以及获得帮助或受到伤害的可能性。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.040
L Citrome, I Reda, M Kerolous
{"title":"辅助卡哌嗪治疗重度抑郁障碍:所需治疗人数、所需伤害人数以及获得帮助或受到伤害的可能性。","authors":"L Citrome, I Reda, M Kerolous","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number needed to treat (NNT) for efficacy and number needed to harm (NNH) for tolerability/safety were evaluated for adjunctive cariprazine in major depressive disorder (MDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of adjunctive cariprazine in MDD. NNTs (response, remission, severity shift) and NNHs (discontinuations due to adverse events [AEs], AEs, laboratory shifts) were determined in dose groupings; likelihood to be helped/harmed (LHH) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NNTs (95 % CI) for adjunctive cariprazine versus placebo were statistically significant at week 6/early termination for response on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), as defined by a decrease in total score ≥ 50 % (doses ≥ 1 mg/d = 12 [9-21]; 1-2 mg/d = 12 [8-25]; 2-4.5 mg/d = 14 [9-43]) and other response/remission outcomes. NNHs for cariprazine versus placebo were generally ≥ 10 for AEs that were statistically significant; an apparent dose-response was seen for akathisia (lower dose = 24 [17-43]; higher dose = 9 [7-11]). LHHs were ≥ 1 (acceptable benefit/harm ratio) for MADRS total score response versus most important cariprazine AEs in most dose groupings. For response versus discontinuation because of an AE, adjunctive cariprazine 1-2 mg/d had a more favorable response/tolerability profile in indirect comparison with other approved atypical antipsychotics.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Post hoc analysis; indirect comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients receiving adjunctive cariprazine encountered benefits more often than harms; NNT values at week 6/early termination were statistically significant versus placebo on response/remission outcomes across dose groupings from the five pooled studies. Adjunctive cariprazine was well tolerated; NNH values versus placebo were generally > 10, with better akathisia tolerability in the lower-dose range.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1238-1247"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjunctive cariprazine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: Number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed.\",\"authors\":\"L Citrome, I Reda, M Kerolous\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number needed to treat (NNT) for efficacy and number needed to harm (NNH) for tolerability/safety were evaluated for adjunctive cariprazine in major depressive disorder (MDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of adjunctive cariprazine in MDD. NNTs (response, remission, severity shift) and NNHs (discontinuations due to adverse events [AEs], AEs, laboratory shifts) were determined in dose groupings; likelihood to be helped/harmed (LHH) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NNTs (95 % CI) for adjunctive cariprazine versus placebo were statistically significant at week 6/early termination for response on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), as defined by a decrease in total score ≥ 50 % (doses ≥ 1 mg/d = 12 [9-21]; 1-2 mg/d = 12 [8-25]; 2-4.5 mg/d = 14 [9-43]) and other response/remission outcomes. NNHs for cariprazine versus placebo were generally ≥ 10 for AEs that were statistically significant; an apparent dose-response was seen for akathisia (lower dose = 24 [17-43]; higher dose = 9 [7-11]). LHHs were ≥ 1 (acceptable benefit/harm ratio) for MADRS total score response versus most important cariprazine AEs in most dose groupings. For response versus discontinuation because of an AE, adjunctive cariprazine 1-2 mg/d had a more favorable response/tolerability profile in indirect comparison with other approved atypical antipsychotics.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Post hoc analysis; indirect comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients receiving adjunctive cariprazine encountered benefits more often than harms; NNT values at week 6/early termination were statistically significant versus placebo on response/remission outcomes across dose groupings from the five pooled studies. Adjunctive cariprazine was well tolerated; NNH values versus placebo were generally > 10, with better akathisia tolerability in the lower-dose range.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1238-1247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对重度抑郁障碍(MDD)中卡哌拉嗪的辅助治疗进行了疗效所需治疗人数(NNT)和耐受性/安全性所需伤害人数(NNH)的评估:从五项针对重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的卡哌拉嗪辅助治疗随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中提取数据。按剂量分组确定NNTs(反应、缓解、严重程度改变)和NNHs(因不良事件[AEs]、AEs、实验室改变而停药);计算受助/受伤害的可能性(LHH):在第6周/早期终止时,对于蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)总分≥50%的反应(剂量≥1 mg/d = 12 [9-21];1-2 mg/d = 12 [8-25];2-4.5 mg/d = 14 [9-43])和其他反应/缓解结果,卡培拉嗪辅助治疗与安慰剂相比的NNTs(95 % CI)具有统计学意义。卡雷拉嗪与安慰剂相比,具有统计学意义的AEs的NNHs一般≥10;在运动障碍方面出现了明显的剂量反应(低剂量=24 [17-43];高剂量=9 [7-11])。在大多数剂量分组中,MADRS总分反应与最重要的卡哌嗪AEs的LHHs≥1(可接受的效益/危害比)。就应答与因AE而停药而言,与其他已获批准的非典型抗精神病药物间接比较,辅助用药卡哌嗪1-2 mg/d具有更有利的应答/耐受性特征:局限性:事后分析;间接比较:接受卡培拉嗪辅助治疗的患者往往利大于弊;在第6周/ET的NNT值与安慰剂相比,5项合并研究中不同剂量组的反应/缓解结果均具有统计学意义。辅助卡哌嗪的耐受性良好;与安慰剂相比,NNH值通常大于10,低剂量范围内的无运动症状耐受性更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adjunctive cariprazine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: Number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed.

Background: The number needed to treat (NNT) for efficacy and number needed to harm (NNH) for tolerability/safety were evaluated for adjunctive cariprazine in major depressive disorder (MDD).

Methods: Data were extracted from five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of adjunctive cariprazine in MDD. NNTs (response, remission, severity shift) and NNHs (discontinuations due to adverse events [AEs], AEs, laboratory shifts) were determined in dose groupings; likelihood to be helped/harmed (LHH) was calculated.

Results: NNTs (95 % CI) for adjunctive cariprazine versus placebo were statistically significant at week 6/early termination for response on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), as defined by a decrease in total score ≥ 50 % (doses ≥ 1 mg/d = 12 [9-21]; 1-2 mg/d = 12 [8-25]; 2-4.5 mg/d = 14 [9-43]) and other response/remission outcomes. NNHs for cariprazine versus placebo were generally ≥ 10 for AEs that were statistically significant; an apparent dose-response was seen for akathisia (lower dose = 24 [17-43]; higher dose = 9 [7-11]). LHHs were ≥ 1 (acceptable benefit/harm ratio) for MADRS total score response versus most important cariprazine AEs in most dose groupings. For response versus discontinuation because of an AE, adjunctive cariprazine 1-2 mg/d had a more favorable response/tolerability profile in indirect comparison with other approved atypical antipsychotics.

Limitations: Post hoc analysis; indirect comparisons.

Conclusions: Patients receiving adjunctive cariprazine encountered benefits more often than harms; NNT values at week 6/early termination were statistically significant versus placebo on response/remission outcomes across dose groupings from the five pooled studies. Adjunctive cariprazine was well tolerated; NNH values versus placebo were generally > 10, with better akathisia tolerability in the lower-dose range.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信