双重设计者:在尸检病例中检测溴唑仑和甲硝唑。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Van Cleve Danielle, Mackenzie Liebl, Ani Kazaryan
{"title":"双重设计者:在尸检病例中检测溴唑仑和甲硝唑。","authors":"Van Cleve Danielle, Mackenzie Liebl, Ani Kazaryan","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkae082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The identification of novel psychoactive substances (NPSs) in casework at the Los Angeles County Department of Medical Examiner (LACDME) is constantly evolving. The case detailed herein marks the first detection of metonitazene in forensic casework at the LACDME which occurred in August 2023. Furthermore, bromazolam was found in the decedent's system and both substances were identified in drug evidence collected at the death scene. No other drugs were detected and the manner and cause of death were determined as accidental due to effects of bromazolam and metonitazene. The concentrations detected were 1.6 ng/mL and 4.4 ng/mL of metonitazene in the jugular blood and femoral blood, respectively, and 93 ng/mL of bromazolam in the femoral blood. Constraints in screening techniques conducted by toxicology laboratories create challenges in which numerous NPSs available on the illicit drug market can go undetected. Even if labs detect an NPS in their screening methodology, confirmation methods might not cover every NPS, given the impracticality of labs keeping pace with validations as new NPSs emerge in casework. The significance of testing medical evidence collected at death scenes by drug chemistry analysis becomes crucial when initial toxicology results are negative. In cases where there is evidence of potential drug paraphernalia this is especially true as it can be pivotal in determining the cause and manner of death.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double Designers: Detection of Bromazolam and Metonitazene in Postmortem Casework.\",\"authors\":\"Van Cleve Danielle, Mackenzie Liebl, Ani Kazaryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jat/bkae082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The identification of novel psychoactive substances (NPSs) in casework at the Los Angeles County Department of Medical Examiner (LACDME) is constantly evolving. The case detailed herein marks the first detection of metonitazene in forensic casework at the LACDME which occurred in August 2023. Furthermore, bromazolam was found in the decedent's system and both substances were identified in drug evidence collected at the death scene. No other drugs were detected and the manner and cause of death were determined as accidental due to effects of bromazolam and metonitazene. The concentrations detected were 1.6 ng/mL and 4.4 ng/mL of metonitazene in the jugular blood and femoral blood, respectively, and 93 ng/mL of bromazolam in the femoral blood. Constraints in screening techniques conducted by toxicology laboratories create challenges in which numerous NPSs available on the illicit drug market can go undetected. Even if labs detect an NPS in their screening methodology, confirmation methods might not cover every NPS, given the impracticality of labs keeping pace with validations as new NPSs emerge in casework. The significance of testing medical evidence collected at death scenes by drug chemistry analysis becomes crucial when initial toxicology results are negative. In cases where there is evidence of potential drug paraphernalia this is especially true as it can be pivotal in determining the cause and manner of death.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae082\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在洛杉矶县法医检验局(LACDME)的个案工作中,新型精神活性物质(NPS)的鉴定工作在不断发展。本文详述的案例标志着 2023 年 8 月在洛杉矶县法医检验局的法医案例工作中首次发现了甲硝唑。此外,还在死者体内发现了溴羟安定,并在死亡现场收集的毒品证据中确定了这两种物质。没有检测到其他药物,死亡方式和原因被确定为溴唑仑和甲硝唑的作用导致的意外死亡。在颈部血液和股部血液中检测到的甲硝唑浓度分别为 1.6 纳克/毫升和 4.4 纳克/毫升,而在股部血液中检测到的溴唑仑浓度为 93 纳克/毫升。毒理学实验室筛查技术的局限性带来了挑战,非法药物市场上的许多 NPS 都可能未被发现。即使实验室在筛查方法中检测到了 NPS,确认方法也可能无法涵盖每一种 NPS,因为随着新的 NPS 在个案工作中出现,实验室跟不上验证的步伐是不切实际的。当初步毒理学结果呈阴性时,通过药物化学分析检测死亡现场收集的医学证据就变得至关重要。在有证据表明可能存在吸毒用具的案件中,这一点尤为重要,因为它可能是确定死因和死亡方式的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Double Designers: Detection of Bromazolam and Metonitazene in Postmortem Casework.

The identification of novel psychoactive substances (NPSs) in casework at the Los Angeles County Department of Medical Examiner (LACDME) is constantly evolving. The case detailed herein marks the first detection of metonitazene in forensic casework at the LACDME which occurred in August 2023. Furthermore, bromazolam was found in the decedent's system and both substances were identified in drug evidence collected at the death scene. No other drugs were detected and the manner and cause of death were determined as accidental due to effects of bromazolam and metonitazene. The concentrations detected were 1.6 ng/mL and 4.4 ng/mL of metonitazene in the jugular blood and femoral blood, respectively, and 93 ng/mL of bromazolam in the femoral blood. Constraints in screening techniques conducted by toxicology laboratories create challenges in which numerous NPSs available on the illicit drug market can go undetected. Even if labs detect an NPS in their screening methodology, confirmation methods might not cover every NPS, given the impracticality of labs keeping pace with validations as new NPSs emerge in casework. The significance of testing medical evidence collected at death scenes by drug chemistry analysis becomes crucial when initial toxicology results are negative. In cases where there is evidence of potential drug paraphernalia this is especially true as it can be pivotal in determining the cause and manner of death.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信