{"title":"双重设计者:在尸检病例中检测溴唑仑和甲硝唑。","authors":"Van Cleve Danielle, Mackenzie Liebl, Ani Kazaryan","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkae082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The identification of novel psychoactive substances (NPSs) in casework at the Los Angeles County Department of Medical Examiner (LACDME) is constantly evolving. The case detailed herein marks the first detection of metonitazene in forensic casework at the LACDME which occurred in August 2023. Furthermore, bromazolam was found in the decedent's system and both substances were identified in drug evidence collected at the death scene. No other drugs were detected and the manner and cause of death were determined as accidental due to effects of bromazolam and metonitazene. The concentrations detected were 1.6 ng/mL and 4.4 ng/mL of metonitazene in the jugular blood and femoral blood, respectively, and 93 ng/mL of bromazolam in the femoral blood. Constraints in screening techniques conducted by toxicology laboratories create challenges in which numerous NPSs available on the illicit drug market can go undetected. Even if labs detect an NPS in their screening methodology, confirmation methods might not cover every NPS, given the impracticality of labs keeping pace with validations as new NPSs emerge in casework. The significance of testing medical evidence collected at death scenes by drug chemistry analysis becomes crucial when initial toxicology results are negative. In cases where there is evidence of potential drug paraphernalia this is especially true as it can be pivotal in determining the cause and manner of death.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double Designers: Detection of Bromazolam and Metonitazene in Postmortem Casework.\",\"authors\":\"Van Cleve Danielle, Mackenzie Liebl, Ani Kazaryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jat/bkae082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The identification of novel psychoactive substances (NPSs) in casework at the Los Angeles County Department of Medical Examiner (LACDME) is constantly evolving. The case detailed herein marks the first detection of metonitazene in forensic casework at the LACDME which occurred in August 2023. Furthermore, bromazolam was found in the decedent's system and both substances were identified in drug evidence collected at the death scene. No other drugs were detected and the manner and cause of death were determined as accidental due to effects of bromazolam and metonitazene. The concentrations detected were 1.6 ng/mL and 4.4 ng/mL of metonitazene in the jugular blood and femoral blood, respectively, and 93 ng/mL of bromazolam in the femoral blood. Constraints in screening techniques conducted by toxicology laboratories create challenges in which numerous NPSs available on the illicit drug market can go undetected. Even if labs detect an NPS in their screening methodology, confirmation methods might not cover every NPS, given the impracticality of labs keeping pace with validations as new NPSs emerge in casework. The significance of testing medical evidence collected at death scenes by drug chemistry analysis becomes crucial when initial toxicology results are negative. In cases where there is evidence of potential drug paraphernalia this is especially true as it can be pivotal in determining the cause and manner of death.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae082\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Double Designers: Detection of Bromazolam and Metonitazene in Postmortem Casework.
The identification of novel psychoactive substances (NPSs) in casework at the Los Angeles County Department of Medical Examiner (LACDME) is constantly evolving. The case detailed herein marks the first detection of metonitazene in forensic casework at the LACDME which occurred in August 2023. Furthermore, bromazolam was found in the decedent's system and both substances were identified in drug evidence collected at the death scene. No other drugs were detected and the manner and cause of death were determined as accidental due to effects of bromazolam and metonitazene. The concentrations detected were 1.6 ng/mL and 4.4 ng/mL of metonitazene in the jugular blood and femoral blood, respectively, and 93 ng/mL of bromazolam in the femoral blood. Constraints in screening techniques conducted by toxicology laboratories create challenges in which numerous NPSs available on the illicit drug market can go undetected. Even if labs detect an NPS in their screening methodology, confirmation methods might not cover every NPS, given the impracticality of labs keeping pace with validations as new NPSs emerge in casework. The significance of testing medical evidence collected at death scenes by drug chemistry analysis becomes crucial when initial toxicology results are negative. In cases where there is evidence of potential drug paraphernalia this is especially true as it can be pivotal in determining the cause and manner of death.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation.
Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.